Angle Orthod. 2022 Mar 1;92(2):265-274. doi: 10.2319/022621-159.1.
To systematically review existing literature regarding clinical parameters comparing surgical laser and conventional surgery with scalpel for soft tissue adjunctive periodontal procedures in orthodontic patients.
MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, LILACS, Bibliografia Brasileira de Odontologia (Brazilian Dental Literature - BBO), Embase, Open Grey, Portal de Periódicos da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - CAPES), and Google Scholar were searched up to December 2020 without language restriction. Clinical trials comparing clinical parameters from surgical laser and conventional surgery with scalpel for soft tissue adjunctive periodontal procedures in orthodontic patients were selected. Risk of bias (RoB) assessments were performed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. Narrative syntheses were performed, and the certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE tool.
Five randomized clinical trials were included. One study was rated as low RoB, whereas others presented some concerns or high RoB. The studies were highly heterogeneous in relation to the procedure performed, laser protocol, outcomes evaluated, and follow-up periods. In general, regardless of the procedure and laser protocol used, the studies did not show significant differences between laser and scalpel for the outcomes of probing pocket depth, clinical crown length, gingival index, and relapse rate. Pain and bleeding were significantly lower with the use of laser compared with the scalpel. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.
The existing literature on the subject is scarce and very heterogeneous and has methodological limitations. Based on the available evidence, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions about the beneficial effect of laser use in orthodontic patients.
系统回顾现有文献中关于比较激光手术与传统手术刀在正畸患者软组织辅助牙周手术中临床参数的研究。
检索 MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science、The Cochrane Library、LILACS、Bibliografia Brasileira de Odontologia(巴西牙科文献-BBO)、Embase、Open Grey、Coordenação para o Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior(高等教育人员完善协调机构-CAPES)的 Portal de Periódicos 以及 Google Scholar,检索时间截至 2020 年 12 月,无语言限制。纳入比较激光手术与传统手术刀在正畸患者软组织辅助牙周手术中临床参数的临床研究。采用 Cochrane RoB2 工具评估偏倚风险(RoB)。进行叙述性综合,并使用 GRADE 工具确定证据的确定性。
共纳入 5 项随机临床试验。1 项研究被评为低 RoB,而其他研究存在一些关注或高 RoB。这些研究在手术程序、激光方案、评估的结局和随访时间方面存在高度异质性。一般来说,无论使用何种手术程序和激光方案,激光与手术刀相比,在探诊袋深度、临床冠长度、牙龈指数和复发率方面均无显著差异。与使用手术刀相比,激光治疗的疼痛和出血明显减少。证据的确定性等级为中等到极低。
目前关于这个主题的文献很少,且非常不一致,存在方法学局限性。根据现有证据,无法对激光在正畸患者中的使用是否有益得出明确结论。