• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接神经证据表明互补学习系统在成人母语词汇习得中的对比作用。

Direct Neural Evidence for the Contrastive Roles of the Complementary Learning Systems in Adult Acquisition of Native Vocabulary.

机构信息

Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9GB, UK.

St Mauritius Rehabilitation Centre, Meerbusch & Heinrich-Heine University, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2022 Aug 3;32(16):3392-3405. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab422.

DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhab422
PMID:34875018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9376875/
Abstract

The Complementary Learning Systems (CLS) theory provides a powerful framework for considering the acquisition, consolidation, and generalization of new knowledge. We tested this proposed neural division of labor in adults through an investigation of the consolidation and long-term retention of newly learned native vocabulary with post-learning functional neuroimaging. Newly learned items were compared with two conditions: 1) previously known items to highlight the similarities and differences with established vocabulary and 2) unknown/untrained items to provide a control for non-specific perceptual and motor speech output. Consistent with the CLS, retrieval of newly learned items was supported by a combination of regions associated with episodic memory (including left hippocampus) and the language-semantic areas that support established vocabulary (left inferior frontal gyrus and left anterior temporal lobe). Furthermore, there was a shifting division of labor across these two networks in line with the items' consolidation status; faster naming was associated with more activation of language-semantic areas and lesser activation of episodic memory regions. Hippocampal activity during naming predicted more than half the variation in naming retention 6 months later.

摘要

互补学习系统 (CLS) 理论为研究新知识的获取、巩固和泛化提供了一个强大的框架。我们通过对新学习的母语词汇的巩固和长期保留进行学习后的功能神经影像学研究,来检验这一提出的神经分工。新学习的项目与两种情况进行了比较:1)以前已知的项目,以突出与已建立词汇的异同;2)未知/未训练的项目,以提供对非特定感知和运动言语输出的控制。与 CLS 一致,新学习项目的检索由与情景记忆相关的区域(包括左海马体)和支持已建立词汇的语言语义区域(左额下回和左颞叶前区)的组合支持。此外,这两个网络中的分工也发生了转移,与项目的巩固状态一致;更快的命名与语言语义区域的更多激活和情景记忆区域的更少激活相关。命名时的海马体活动预测了 6 个月后命名保留的一半以上的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb6/9376875/b2a740e13e1c/bhab422f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb6/9376875/a4ada5fec322/bhab422f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb6/9376875/7d68e872aa50/bhab422f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb6/9376875/8e62dd037c88/bhab422f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb6/9376875/b2a740e13e1c/bhab422f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb6/9376875/a4ada5fec322/bhab422f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb6/9376875/7d68e872aa50/bhab422f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb6/9376875/8e62dd037c88/bhab422f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb6/9376875/b2a740e13e1c/bhab422f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Direct Neural Evidence for the Contrastive Roles of the Complementary Learning Systems in Adult Acquisition of Native Vocabulary.直接神经证据表明互补学习系统在成人母语词汇习得中的对比作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Aug 3;32(16):3392-3405. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab422.
2
Hippocampus activity differentiates good from poor learners of a novel lexicon.海马体活动可区分新词汇学习能力强与弱的人。
Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 15;25(3):958-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.019.
3
Neural underpinnings for model-oriented therapy of aphasic word production.失语症词汇生成的面向模型治疗的神经基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 May;57:154-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
4
Neural representations for newly learned words are modulated by overnight consolidation, reading skill, and age.新学单词的神经表征受夜间巩固、阅读技能和年龄的调节。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar;111:133-144. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
NEREC, an effective brain mapping protocol for combined language and long-term memory functions.NEREC,一种用于联合语言和长期记忆功能的有效脑图谱绘制方案。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Dec;53:140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.09.017. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
6
A lexical semantic hub for heteromodal naming in middle fusiform gyrus.中梭状回的异模态命名的词汇语义枢纽。
Brain. 2018 Jul 1;141(7):2112-2126. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy120.
7
Framing memories: How the retrieval query format shapes the neural bases of remembering.构建记忆:检索查询格式如何塑造记忆的神经基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Aug;89:309-319. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.036. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
8
Neural sensitivity to semantic neighbors is stable across the adult lifespan.成人的一生中,对语义邻居的神经敏感性是稳定的。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jul 4;171:108237. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108237. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
9
Cerebellar BOLD signal during the acquisition of a new lexicon predicts its early consolidation.在获取新词汇过程中小脑的血氧水平依赖信号可预测其早期巩固。
Brain Lang. 2016 Oct;161:33-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
10
Two different brain networks underlying picture naming with familiar pre-existing native words and new vocabulary.两种不同的脑网络,分别为熟悉的固有单词和新词汇的图片命名提供基础。
Brain Lang. 2023 Feb;237:105231. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105231. Epub 2023 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
EPS mid-career prize: An integrated framework for the learning, recognition and interpretation of words.EPS 中期职业奖:用于单词学习、识别和解释的综合框架。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Dec;77(12):2365-2384. doi: 10.1177/17470218241284289. Epub 2024 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Reverse-engineering the cortical architecture for controlled semantic cognition.对皮质结构进行反向工程以实现可控语义认知。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jun;5(6):774-786. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01034-z. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
A unified neurocomputational bilateral model of spoken language production in healthy participants and recovery in poststroke aphasia.健康受试者口语产生的统一神经计算双边模型和中风后失语症的恢复。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 22;117(51):32779-32790. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010193117. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
3
The neural correlates of semantic control revisited.
重新探讨语义控制的神经关联。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117444. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117444. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
4
Overarching Principles and Dimensions of the Functional Organization in the Inferior Parietal Cortex.顶叶下皮质功能组织的总体原则和维度。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Oct 1;30(11):5639-5653. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa133.
5
Integration of new information in memory: new insights from a complementary learning systems perspective.记忆中新信息的整合:从互补学习系统视角的新见解。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 May 25;375(1799):20190637. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0637. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
Concepts, control, and context: A connectionist account of normal and disordered semantic cognition.概念、控制和语境:连接主义对正常和异常语义认知的解释。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Apr;125(3):293-328. doi: 10.1037/rev0000094.
7
Time for a quick word? The striking benefits of training speed and accuracy of word retrieval in post-stroke aphasia.有时间说句话吗?在中风后失语症中,训练单词检索的速度和准确性具有显著的益处。
Brain. 2018 Jun 1;141(6):1815-1827. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy087.
8
The Roles of Left Versus Right Anterior Temporal Lobes in Semantic Memory: A Neuropsychological Comparison of Postsurgical Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients.左、右前颞叶在语义记忆中的作用:手术后颞叶癫痫患者的神经心理学比较。
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Apr 1;28(4):1487-1501. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx362.
9
Less is more: neural mechanisms underlying anomia treatment in chronic aphasic patients.少即是多:慢性失语症患者命名障碍治疗的神经机制。
Brain. 2017 Nov 1;140(11):3039-3054. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx234.
10
A unified model of human semantic knowledge and its disorders.人类语义知识及其障碍的统一模型。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0039. Epub 2017 Mar 1.