Suppr超能文献

老年内科患者触发医疗应急团队呼叫的特征、风险因素和结果。

Features, risk factors, and outcomes of older internal medicine patients triggering a medical emergency team call.

机构信息

Department of General Medicine, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Intensive Care Unit, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Mar;66(3):392-400. doi: 10.1111/aas.14014. Epub 2021 Dec 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information about the epidemiology of older Internal Medicine patients receiving medical emergency team (MET) calls is limited. We assessed the prevalence, characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of this vulnerable group.

METHODS

Internal Medicine patients aged >75 years who were admitted via the Emergency Department to a tertiary hospital between January 2015 to December 2018 and who activated a MET call were compared to patients without MET call activation during the same time period. Outcome measures included management post-MET call, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission rates, discharge disposition, length of hospital stays (LOS), and in-patient mortality.

RESULTS

There were 10,803 Internal Medical admissions involving 10,423 patients; median age 85 (IQR 81-89) years. Of these, 995 (10%) patients received at least one MET call. MET call patients had greater physiological instability in the Emergency Department and higher median Charlson comorbidity index values (2, IQR 1-3 vs. 1, IQR 0-2; p < .0001) than non-MET call patients. Overall, 10% of MET call patients were admitted to ICU. MET patients had a longer median length of stay (9 [IQR 5-14] vs. 4 days [IQR 2-7]; p < .001) and higher in-hospital mortality (29% vs. 7%; p < .001). However, mortality of MET call patients without treatment limitations was 48/357 (13%).

CONCLUSION

One in ten Internal Medicine patients aged >75 years and admitted via ED had a MET call. Physiological instability in ED and comorbidities were key risk factors. Mortality in MET patients approached 30%. These data can help predict at-risk patients for improving goals of care and pre-MET interventions.

摘要

背景

有关接受医疗应急团队(MET)呼叫的老年内科患者的流行病学信息有限。我们评估了这个脆弱群体的患病率、特征、危险因素和结局。

方法

2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间,通过急诊收治至一家三级医院的年龄>75 岁的内科患者,在同一时期内,与未激活 MET 呼叫的患者进行比较。结果测量包括 MET 呼叫后的管理、重症监护病房(ICU)入院率、出院处置、住院时间(LOS)和住院死亡率。

结果

共有 10803 例内科住院患者涉及 10423 例患者;中位年龄 85(IQR 81-89)岁。其中 995(10%)例患者至少接受了一次 MET 呼叫。MET 呼叫患者在急诊科的生理不稳定程度更高,Charlson 合并症指数中位数更高(2,IQR 1-3 与 1,IQR 0-2;p<.0001)。总体而言,10%的 MET 呼叫患者被收治 ICU。MET 患者的中位住院时间较长(9[IQR 5-14]与 4 天[IQR 2-7];p<.001),住院死亡率较高(29%与 7%;p<.001)。然而,无治疗限制的 MET 呼叫患者的死亡率为 48/357(13%)。

结论

十分之一年龄>75 岁且通过急诊收治的内科患者有 MET 呼叫。急诊科的生理不稳定和合并症是关键的危险因素。MET 患者的死亡率接近 30%。这些数据可以帮助预测高危患者,以改善目标治疗和 MET 前干预。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验