Suppr超能文献

住院患者再次出现临床恶化和重复医疗急救团队激活的特征和结局*。

Characteristics and outcomes for hospitalized patients with recurrent clinical deterioration and repeat medical emergency team activation*.

机构信息

1Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Medicine, and Community Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada. 2Division of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 3Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1601-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000315.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the occurrence of recurrent clinical deterioration and repeat medical emergency team activation and assess its effect on processes and outcomes of care.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two community hospitals and two tertiary care hospitals, Alberta, Canada.

PATIENTS

Consecutive hospitalized adult patients with sudden clinical deterioration and medical emergency team activation without admission to ICU.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

We compared ICU admission rates (admissions > 2 hr following index medical emergency team), hospital length of stay, and hospital mortality for a cohort of 3,200 patients with and without recurrent clinical deterioration following medical emergency team activation adjusting for patient, provider, and hospital characteristics.The cohort consisted of 3,200 patients. Ten percent of patients (n = 337) experienced recurrent clinical deterioration and repeat medical emergency team activation during their hospital stay. Patients more likely to experience recurrent clinical deterioration and repeat medical emergency team activation included those with chronic liver disease (odds ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.14-2.69) or who received airway suctioning (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.23-2.25), noninvasive mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.94-2.94), or central IV catheter insertion (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.02-3.21) during the index medical emergency team activation. Patients with recurrent clinical deterioration were more likely than patients without recurrent clinical deterioration to be subsequently admitted to ICU (43% vs 13%; odds ratio, 6.11; 95% CI, 4.67-8.00; p < 0.01), to have longer lengths of hospital stay (median, 31 d vs 13 d; p < 0.01), and to die during their hospital stay (34% vs 23%; odds ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.47-2.67; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent clinical deterioration and repeat medical emergency team activation are common and associated with increased risk of subsequent ICU admission, increased length of hospital stay, and increased hospital mortality. It may be possible to identify patients at risk of recurrent clinical deterioration following medical emergency team activation and target interventions to improve patient care.

摘要

目的

描述临床恶化的复发和医疗急救团队的再次激活,并评估其对护理过程和结果的影响。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

加拿大艾伯塔省的两家社区医院和两家三级保健医院。

患者

突然出现临床恶化并接受医疗急救团队激活但未入住 ICU 的连续住院成年患者。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

我们比较了 ICU 入院率(医疗急救团队后 2 小时以上的入院)、住院时间和医院死亡率,比较了有和没有医疗急救团队激活后临床恶化复发的 3200 例患者的队列,调整了患者、提供者和医院的特征。该队列包括 3200 例患者。10%的患者(n=337)在住院期间经历了临床恶化的复发和医疗急救团队的再次激活。更有可能经历临床恶化复发和医疗急救团队再次激活的患者包括患有慢性肝病(优势比,1.75;95%置信区间,1.14-2.69)或接受气道抽吸(优势比,1.66;95%置信区间,1.23-2.25)、无创机械通气(优势比,1.67;95%置信区间,0.94-2.94)或中心静脉导管插入(优势比,1.81;95%置信区间,1.02-3.21)的患者。与没有临床恶化复发的患者相比,有临床恶化复发的患者更有可能随后被收入 ICU(43% vs 13%;优势比,6.11;95%置信区间,4.67-8.00;p < 0.01),住院时间更长(中位数,31 天 vs 13 天;p < 0.01),住院期间死亡(34% vs 23%;优势比,1.98;95%置信区间,1.47-2.67;p < 0.01)。

结论

临床恶化的复发和医疗急救团队的再次激活很常见,并与随后 ICU 入院、住院时间延长和医院死亡率增加相关。有可能识别出医疗急救团队激活后有临床恶化复发风险的患者,并针对这些患者采取干预措施以改善患者的护理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验