Suppr超能文献

慢性偏头痛和慢性紧张型头痛的心理物理学测试:一项观察性研究。

Psychophysical testing in chronic migraine and chronic tension type headache: An observational study.

作者信息

Elizagaray-García Ignacio, Carvalho Gabriela F, Szikszay Tibor M, Adamczyk Waclaw M, Navarro-Fernández Gonzalo, Alvarez-Testillano Paula, Díaz-de-Terán Javier, Luedtke Kerstin, Gil-Martínez Alfonso

机构信息

Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

CranioSPain Research Group, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2022 Jun;42(7):618-630. doi: 10.1177/03331024211060315. Epub 2021 Dec 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical presentation is the key to the diagnosis of patients with migraine and tension-type headache, but features may overlap when both become chronic. Psychophysical parameters may distinguish both conditions. We aimed to compare psychophysical aspects of patients with chronic migraine, chronic tension-type headache and headache-free controls, and to determine whether these can predict headache frequency.

METHODS

An examiner blinded to the diagnosis assessed 100 participants (chronic migraine (n = 38), chronic tension-type headache (n = 31) and controls (n = 31)). Assessed variables included painful area, pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation, cervical range of motion, neck posture, headache and neck impact, quality of life, and kinesiophobia. Comparison between groups was performed with one-way ANOVA and multiple linear regression was used to assess the headache frequency predictors.

RESULTS

We found differences of both headache groups compared to controls ( < 0.01), but not between headache groups. Neck disability was a significant predictor of headache frequency for chronic tension-type headache (adjusted R = 0.14; β = 0.43;  = 0.03) and chronic migraine (adjusted R = 0.18; β = 0.51;  < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic tension-type headache and chronic migraine showed similar psychophysical results, but were significantly worse when compared to controls. The psychophysical examination did not discriminate between headache types. The variable best explaining headache frequency for both headache types was neck disability.

摘要

背景

临床表现是偏头痛和紧张型头痛患者诊断的关键,但当两者都变为慢性时,症状可能会重叠。心理物理学参数可能有助于区分这两种情况。我们旨在比较慢性偏头痛、慢性紧张型头痛患者和无头痛对照组的心理物理学方面,并确定这些是否可以预测头痛频率。

方法

一名对诊断不知情的检查者评估了100名参与者(慢性偏头痛患者(n = 38)、慢性紧张型头痛患者(n = 31)和对照组(n = 31))。评估的变量包括疼痛区域、压痛阈值、时间总和、颈椎活动范围、颈部姿势、头痛和颈部影响、生活质量以及运动恐惧。采用单因素方差分析进行组间比较,并使用多元线性回归评估头痛频率的预测因素。

结果

我们发现两个头痛组与对照组相比均存在差异(<0.01),但头痛组之间无差异。颈部功能障碍是慢性紧张型头痛(调整后R = 0.14;β = 0.43; = 0.03)和慢性偏头痛(调整后R = 0.18;β = 0.51;<0.01)头痛频率的显著预测因素。

结论

慢性紧张型头痛和慢性偏头痛表现出相似的心理物理学结果,但与对照组相比明显更差。心理物理学检查无法区分头痛类型。对两种头痛类型的头痛频率解释力最强的变量是颈部功能障碍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验