• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过麦吉尔疼痛问卷确认慢性偏头痛与慢性紧张型头痛之间的区别。

Confirmation of the distinction between chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache by the McGill Pain Questionnaire.

作者信息

Mongini Franco, Deregibus Andrea, Raviola Fabio, Mongini Tullia

机构信息

Headache and Facial Pain Unit, Department of Clinical Pathophysiology, University of Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Headache. 2003 Sep;43(8):867-77. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03165.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03165.x
PMID:12940808
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if the McGill Pain Questionnaire confirms the distinction between chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache.

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that different categories of chronic daily headache should be distinguished; in particular, chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache.

METHODS

The McGill Pain Questionnaire and a visual analog scale were administered to 40 patients with chronic daily headache, 85 patients with migraine, and 47 patients with episodic tension-type headache. The patients with chronic daily headache were subdivided, according to criteria described by other authors, into those with chronic migraine (n=29) and those with chronic tension-type headache (n=11). Weighted McGill Pain Questionnaire item scores, subscales, total pain rating indexes, and choice frequency of the descriptors were calculated. The data of chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache were compared and tested for significant differences (Student t test). The same was done for migraine and episodic tension-type headache. Data were also processed through the Self-organizing Map, a system based on a counter-propagation neural network.

RESULTS

In the chronic migraine group, compared with the chronic tension-type headache group, scores were higher in 17 of 20 McGill Pain Questionnaire items (significantly in 5) and for the sensory and affective subscales (significantly). In the migraine group, compared with the episodic tension-type headache group, scores were higher for 18 McGill Pain Questionnaire items (significantly in 7), and for the sensory, affective, and mixed affective-evaluative subscales, total pain-rating index, and visual analog scale (all significantly). The coincidence of descriptors of first choice was low between chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache, but it was high between chronic migraine and migraine and between chronic tension-type headache and episodic tension-type headache. After Self-organizing Map analysis, chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache were prevalently distributed in 2 different areas of the map.

CONCLUSIONS

In the disorders characterized by a daily and near-daily headache, the McGill Pain Questionnaire consistently can discriminate between those evolving from migraine and those evolving from tension-type headache, indirectly confirming the validity of a distinction between these 2 clinical conditions. The differences are similar to those observed between patients with migraine and patients with episodic tension-type headache. This seems to be independent of the pain level since the difference of the total pain-rating index and the visual analog scale between chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache was not statistically significant.

摘要

目的

探讨麦吉尔疼痛问卷是否能证实慢性偏头痛与慢性紧张型头痛之间的区别。

背景

有人提出应区分不同类型的慢性每日头痛;尤其是慢性偏头痛和慢性紧张型头痛。

方法

对40例慢性每日头痛患者、85例偏头痛患者和47例发作性紧张型头痛患者进行麦吉尔疼痛问卷和视觉模拟评分。根据其他作者描述的标准,将慢性每日头痛患者分为慢性偏头痛患者(n = 29)和慢性紧张型头痛患者(n = 11)。计算麦吉尔疼痛问卷项目的加权得分、分量表、总疼痛评分指数以及描述词的选择频率。比较慢性偏头痛和慢性紧张型头痛的数据并检验是否存在显著差异(学生t检验)。对偏头痛和发作性紧张型头痛也进行同样的操作。数据还通过自组织映射进行处理,自组织映射是一种基于反向传播神经网络的系统。

结果

在慢性偏头痛组中,与慢性紧张型头痛组相比,麦吉尔疼痛问卷20个项目中的17个项目得分更高(5个项目显著更高),感觉和情感分量表得分也更高(显著更高)。在偏头痛组中,与发作性紧张型头痛组相比,麦吉尔疼痛问卷18个项目得分更高(7个项目显著更高),感觉、情感以及情感 - 评价混合分量表、总疼痛评分指数和视觉模拟评分得分均更高(均显著更高)。慢性偏头痛和慢性紧张型头痛之间首选描述词的一致性较低,但慢性偏头痛与偏头痛之间以及慢性紧张型头痛与发作性紧张型头痛之间的一致性较高。经过自组织映射分析后,慢性偏头痛和慢性紧张型头痛主要分布在映射图的2个不同区域。

结论

在以每日或近乎每日头痛为特征的疾病中,麦吉尔疼痛问卷始终能够区分由偏头痛演变而来的头痛和由紧张型头痛演变而来的头痛,间接证实了这两种临床情况区分的有效性。这些差异与偏头痛患者和发作性紧张型头痛患者之间观察到的差异相似。这似乎与疼痛程度无关,因为慢性偏头痛和慢性紧张型头痛之间的总疼痛评分指数和视觉模拟评分差异无统计学意义。

相似文献

1
Confirmation of the distinction between chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache by the McGill Pain Questionnaire.通过麦吉尔疼痛问卷确认慢性偏头痛与慢性紧张型头痛之间的区别。
Headache. 2003 Sep;43(8):867-77. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03165.x.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Persian HIT-6 Questionnaire in Migraine and Tension-type Headache.波斯语版HIT-6问卷在偏头痛和紧张型头痛中的信度和效度
Pain Pract. 2014 Sep;14(7):625-31. doi: 10.1111/papr.12120. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
3
[The validity of the classification criteria of the International Headache Society for migraine, episodic tension headache and chronic tension headache].[国际头痛协会偏头痛、发作性紧张性头痛和慢性紧张性头痛分类标准的有效性]
Neurologia. 1999 Jun-Jul;14(6):283-8.
4
Neuroticism, depression and pain perception in migraine and tension-type headache.偏头痛和紧张型头痛中的神经质、抑郁与疼痛感知
Acta Neurol Scand. 2017 Nov;136(5):470-476. doi: 10.1111/ane.12751. Epub 2017 Mar 5.
5
Osmophobia in juvenile primary headaches.青少年原发性头痛中的恐嗅症
Cephalalgia. 2008 Aug;28(8):825-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01589.x. Epub 2008 May 21.
6
Validation of a german language questionnaire for screening for migraine, tension-type headache, and trigeminal autonomic cephalgias.一份用于筛查偏头痛、紧张型头痛和三叉自主神经性头痛的德语问卷的验证
Headache. 2007 Apr;47(4):546-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00758.x.
7
Tension-type headache or migraine? Adolescents' pain descriptions are of little help.紧张型头痛还是偏头痛?青少年的疼痛描述没什么帮助。
Headache. 2013 Feb;53(2):322-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02224.x. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
8
Applicability of the 1988 IHS criteria to headache patients under the age of 18 years attending 21 Italian headache clinics. Juvenile Headache Collaborative Study Group.1988年国际头痛协会(IHS)标准在21家意大利头痛诊所就诊的18岁以下头痛患者中的适用性。青少年头痛协作研究组。
Headache. 1995 Mar;35(3):146-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3503146.x.
9
The validation of the Hungarian version of the ID-migraine questionnaire.《偏头痛识别问卷匈牙利语版本的验证》。
J Headache Pain. 2018 Nov 12;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0938-z.
10
[Tension type headaches : Quo vadis?].[紧张型头痛:何去何从?]
Schmerz. 2020 Dec;34(6):464-475. doi: 10.1007/s00482-020-00495-5. Epub 2020 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Correction of Posttraumatic Scapulothoracic Bursitis, Rhomboid Major Muscle Injury, Ipsilateral Glenohumeral Instability, and Headaches Resulting from Circus Acrobatic Maneuvers.创伤后肩胛胸壁滑囊炎、菱形肌损伤、同侧盂肱关节不稳及杂技动作导致的头痛的手术矫正
Case Rep Orthop. 2015;2015:302850. doi: 10.1155/2015/302850. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
2
Comparison of clinical characteristics of migraine and tension type headache.偏头痛和紧张型头痛的临床特征比较。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;53(2):134-9. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.82538.