Suppr超能文献

X-ray Computed Tomography Instrument Performance Evaluation, Part I: Sensitivity to Detector Geometry Errors.

作者信息

Muralikrishnan Bala, Shilling Meghan, Phillips Steve, Ren Wei, Lee Vincent, Kim Felix

机构信息

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA.

出版信息

J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2019 Jul 11;124:1-16. doi: 10.6028/jres.124.014. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

X-ray computed tomography (XCT), long used in medical imaging and defect inspection, is now increasingly used for dimensional measurements of geometrical features in engineering components. With widespread use of XCT instruments, there is growing need for the development of standardized test procedures to verify manufacturer specifications and provide pathways to establish metrological traceability. As technical committees within the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) are developing documentary standards that include test procedures that are sensitive to all known error sources, we report on work exploring one set of error sources, instrument geometry errors, and their effect on dimensional measurements. In particular, we studied detector and rotation stage errors in cone-beam XCT instruments and determined their influence on sphere center-to-center distance errors and sphere form errors for spheres located in the tomographically reconstructed measurement volume. We developed a novel method, called the single-point ray tracing method, that allows for efficient determination of the sphere center-to-center distance error and sphere form error in the presence of each of the different geometry errors in an XCT instrument. In Part I of this work, we (1) describe the single-point ray tracing method, (2) discuss optimal placement of spheres so that sphere center-to-center distance errors and sphere form errors are sensitive to the different detector geometry errors, and (3) present data validating our method against the more conventional radiograph-based tomographic reconstruction method. In Part II of this work, we discuss optimal placement of spheres so that sphere center-to-center distance errors and sphere form errors are sensitive to error sources associated with the rotation stage. This work is in support of ongoing standards development activity within ASME and ISO for XCT performance evaluation.

摘要

相似文献

1
X-ray Computed Tomography Instrument Performance Evaluation, Part I: Sensitivity to Detector Geometry Errors.
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2019 Jul 11;124:1-16. doi: 10.6028/jres.124.014. eCollection 2019.
2
X-ray Computed Tomography Instrument Performance Evaluation, Part II: Sensitivity to Rotation Stage Errors.
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2019 Jul 11;124:1-13. doi: 10.6028/jres.124.015. eCollection 2019.
4
ASME B89.4.23 Performance Evaluation Tests and Geometry Errors in X-Ray Computed Tomography Systems.
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2022 Jan 20;126:126042. doi: 10.6028/jres.126.042. eCollection 2021.
7
Tolerance to geometrical inaccuracies in CBCT systems: A comprehensive study.
Med Phys. 2021 Oct;48(10):6007-6019. doi: 10.1002/mp.15065. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
9
X-ray computed tomography evaluations of additive manufactured multimaterial composites.
J Microsc. 2022 Mar;285(3):131-143. doi: 10.1111/jmi.13034. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
ASME B89.4.23 Performance Evaluation Tests and Geometry Errors in X-Ray Computed Tomography Systems.
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2022 Jan 20;126:126042. doi: 10.6028/jres.126.042. eCollection 2021.
3
X-ray Computed Tomography Instrument Performance Evaluation, Part II: Sensitivity to Rotation Stage Errors.
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2019 Jul 11;124:1-13. doi: 10.6028/jres.124.015. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验