Suppr超能文献

不同微创外科治疗椎体压缩骨折的疗效:一项观察性研究。

Outcomes of different minimally invasive surgical treatments for vertebral compression fractures: An observational study.

作者信息

Yeh Kuei-Lin, Wu Szu-Hsien, Liaw Chen-Kun, Hou Sheng-Mou, Wu Shing-Sheng

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei 11101, Taiwan.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.

出版信息

World J Clin Cases. 2021 Nov 6;9(31):9509-9519. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i31.9509.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis with vertebral compression fractures is increasingly common in the elderly population. Cement augmentation is one of the effective surgical treatments for these patients. Currently, there are several different types of cement augmentation treatments. No studies have compared the safety and efficacy of different cement augmentation types for the treatment of such fractures; thus, we retrospectively compared vertebroplasty, balloon kyphoplasty, and kyphoplasty with SpineJack or an intravertebral expandable pillar.

AIM

To compare the postoperative safety and efficacy of each surgical intervention in treating vertebral compression fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 354 patients with acute vertebral compression fractures, defined as signal changes in the T1 weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and randomly divided the patients into five groups. Their visual analog scale scores for pain, kyphotic angle, average body height, rate of cement leakage, and occurrence of adjacent vertebral compression fractures were followed for 1 year. One-way analysis of variance, the post hoc Bonferroni test, and Fisher exact probability test were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

All pain scores significantly improved 12 mo postoperatively; however, there was no significant difference between the groups ( = 0.325). Kyphoplasty with SpineJack significantly reduced the kyphotic angle ( = 0.028) and restored the height of the vertebral body ( = 0.02). The rate of adjacent compression fractures was the highest in the vertebroplasty group, with a statistically significant difference according to the Fisher exact probability test ( = 0.02). The treatment with the lowest cement leakage rate cannot be identified because of the small sample size; however, kyphoplasty with SpineJack, an IVEP, and vesselplasty resulted in lower rates of cement leakage than balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Kyphoplasty with SpineJack has good outcomes in kyphotic angle reduction and body height restoration. Vertebroplasty has the highest cement leakage rate and adjacent compression fracture occurrence.

摘要

背景

骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折在老年人群中日益常见。骨水泥强化是治疗这些患者的有效手术方法之一。目前,有几种不同类型的骨水泥强化治疗方法。尚无研究比较不同类型骨水泥强化治疗此类骨折的安全性和有效性;因此,我们回顾性比较了椎体成形术、球囊后凸成形术以及使用SpineJack或椎体内可扩张支柱的后凸成形术。

目的

比较每种手术干预治疗椎体压缩骨折的术后安全性和有效性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了354例急性椎体压缩骨折患者,其定义为T1加权磁共振成像中的信号改变,并将患者随机分为五组。随访1年,观察其疼痛视觉模拟评分、后凸角、平均身高、骨水泥渗漏率及相邻椎体压缩骨折的发生情况。采用单因素方差分析、事后Bonferroni检验和Fisher精确概率检验进行统计分析。

结果

术后12个月时所有疼痛评分均显著改善;然而,各治疗组之间无显著差异(P = 0.325)。使用SpineJack的后凸成形术显著降低了后凸角(P = 0.028)并恢复了椎体高度(P = 0.02)。椎体成形术组相邻压缩骨折发生率最高,根据Fisher精确概率检验有统计学显著差异(P = 0.02)。由于样本量小,无法确定骨水泥渗漏率最低的治疗方法;然而,使用SpineJack的后凸成形术、椎体内可扩张支柱和血管成形术的骨水泥渗漏率低于球囊后凸成形术和椎体成形术。

结论

使用SpineJack的后凸成形术在减少后凸角和恢复身高方面效果良好。椎体成形术的骨水泥渗漏率和相邻压缩骨折发生率最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c43/8610862/b0d04b52fd2a/WJCC-9-9509-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验