Suppr超能文献

小细胞肺癌分期:传统分期检查、FDG PET/CT、全身MRI及融合的FDG PET/MRI的前瞻性比较

Small Cell Lung Cancer Staging: Prospective Comparison of Conventional Staging Tests, FDG PET/CT, Whole-Body MRI, and Coregistered FDG PET/MRI.

作者信息

Ohno Yoshiharu, Yoshikawa Takeshi, Takenaka Daisuke, Koyama Hisanobu, Aoyagi Kota, Yui Masao, Oshima Yuka, Hamabuchi Nayu, Tanaka Yumi, Shigemura Chika, Oota Seiichiro, Nomura Masahiko, Murayama Kazuhiro, Inui Yoshitaka, Kikukawa Kaoru, Toyama Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.

Joint Research Laboratory of Advanced Medical Imaging, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 May;218(5):899-908. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26868. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

Abstract

Whole-body MRI and FDG PET/MRI have shown encouraging results for staging of thoracic malignancy but are poorly studied for staging of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The purpose of our study was to compare the performance of conventional staging tests, FDG PET/CT, whole-body MRI, and FDG PET/MRI for staging of SCLC. This prospective study included 98 patients (64 men, 34 women; median age, 74 years) with SCLC who underwent conventional staging tests (brain MRI; neck, chest, and abdominopelvic CT; and bone scintigraphy), FDG PET/CT, and whole-body MRI within 2 weeks before treatment; coregistered FDG PET/MRI was generated. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently reviewed conventional tests and FDG PET/CT examinations in separate sessions, and two chest radiologists independently reviewed whole-body MRI and FDG PET/MRI examinations in separate sessions. Readers assessed T, N, and M categories; TNM stage; and Veterans Administration Lung Cancer Study Group (VALSG) stage. Reader pairs subsequently reached consensus. Stages determined clinically during tumor board sessions served as the reference standard. Accuracy for T category was higher ( < .05) for whole-body MRI (94.9%) and FDG PET/MRI (94.9%) than for FDG PET/CT (85.7%). Accuracy for N category was higher ( < .05) for whole-body MRI (84.7%), FDG PET/MRI (83.7%), and FDG PET/CT (81.6%) than for conventional staging tests (75.5%). Accuracy for M category was higher ( < .05) for whole-body MRI (94.9%), FDG PET/MRI (94.9%), and FDG PET/CT (94.9%) than for conventional staging tests (84.7%). Accuracy for TNM stage was higher ( < .05) for whole-body MRI (88.8%) and FDG PET/MRI (86.7%) than for FDG PET/CT (77.6%) and conventional staging tests (72.4%). Accuracy for VALSG stage was higher ( < .05) for whole-body MRI (95.9%), FDG PET/MRI (95.9%), and FDG PET/CT (98.0%) than for conventional staging tests (82.7%). Interobserver agreement, expressed as kappa coefficients, ranged from 0.81 to 0.94 across imaging tests and staging endpoints. FDG PET/CT, whole-body MRI, and coregistered FDG PET/MRI outperformed conventional tests for various staging endpoints in patients with SCLC. Whole-body MRI and FDG PET/MRI outperformed FDG PET/CT for T category and thus TNM stage, indicating the utility of MRI for assessing extent of local invasion in SCLC. Incorporation of either MRI approach may improve initial staging evaluation in SCLC.

摘要

全身MRI和FDG PET/MRI在胸段恶性肿瘤分期方面已显示出令人鼓舞的结果,但在小细胞肺癌(SCLC)分期方面的研究较少。我们研究的目的是比较传统分期检查、FDG PET/CT、全身MRI和FDG PET/MRI在SCLC分期中的表现。这项前瞻性研究纳入了98例SCLC患者(64例男性,34例女性;中位年龄74岁),这些患者在治疗前2周内接受了传统分期检查(脑部MRI;颈部、胸部和腹盆腔CT;以及骨闪烁显像)、FDG PET/CT和全身MRI检查;生成了配准的FDG PET/MRI。两名核医学医师在不同的时间段分别独立审查传统检查和FDG PET/CT检查,两名胸部放射科医师在不同的时间段分别独立审查全身MRI和FDG PET/MRI检查。阅片者评估T、N和M分类;TNM分期;以及退伍军人管理局肺癌研究组(VALSG)分期。阅片者随后达成共识。在肿瘤多学科讨论会上临床确定的分期作为参考标准。全身MRI(94.9%)和FDG PET/MRI(94.9%)对T分类的准确性高于FDG PET/CT(85.7%)(P<0.05)。全身MRI(84.7%)、FDG PET/MRI(83.7%)和FDG PET/CT(81.6%)对N分类的准确性高于传统分期检查(75.5%)(P<0.05)。全身MRI(94.9%)、FDG PET/MRI(94.9%)和FDG PET/CT(94.9%)对M分类的准确性高于传统分期检查(84.7%)(P<0.05)。全身MRI(88.8%)和FDG PET/MRI(86.7%)对TNM分期的准确性高于FDG PET/CT(77.6%)和传统分期检查(72.4%)(P<0.05)。全身MRI(95.9%)、FDG PET/MRI(95.9%)和FDG PET/CT(98.0%)对VALSG分期的准确性高于传统分期检查(82.7%)(P<0.05)。以kappa系数表示的观察者间一致性在各种成像检查和分期终点中范围为0.81至0.94。对于SCLC患者的各种分期终点,FDG PET/CT、全身MRI和配准的FDG PET/MRI的表现均优于传统检查。全身MRI和FDG PET/MRI在T分类以及因此在TNM分期方面的表现优于FDG PET/CT,表明MRI在评估SCLC局部侵犯范围方面的实用性。纳入任何一种MRI方法都可能改善SCLC的初始分期评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验