初级保健护士在糖尿病足教育干预前后的知识。
Knowledge of primary care nurses before and after educational intervention on diabetic foot.
机构信息
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG), Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Unidade Acadêmica de Enfermagem. Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Departamento de Enfermagem. Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil.
出版信息
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2021 Dec 6;42:e20200452. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200452. eCollection 2021.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the knowledge of the nurses about the diabetic foot before and after the educational intervention.
METHOD
Quasi-experimental study, before-and-after type, carried out with 53 nurses, from March to June 2016, in the municipality of Campina Grande, Paraíba. The Questioning Methodology was used to develop the educational intervention. Knowledge was investigated using an instrument designed by the researchers. For data analysis before and after the intervention, the McNemar and Wilcoxon tests were performed.
RESULTS
The knowledge of the nurses about the diabetic foot turned out to be deficient, with a mean of correct answers in the pre-test of 23.8 (SD±12.8) and after 41.9 (SD±9,2), with a statistically significant difference (p<0.01).
CONCLUSION
It was verified a significant increase in the knowledge after the intervention, highlighting the items related to evaluate the loss of plantar protective sensitivity, essential for the prevention of diabetic foot.
目的
比较教育干预前后护士对糖尿病足的认识。
方法
这是一项准实验研究，采用问卷调查法，于 2016 年 3 月至 6 月在帕拉伊巴州坎皮纳格兰德市对 53 名护士进行了研究。教育干预由研究者设计的工具进行。使用仪器调查知识。在干预前后进行数据分析，使用 McNemar 和 Wilcoxon 检验。
结果
护士对糖尿病足的认识不足，预测试的平均正确答案为 23.8（SD±12.8），后测为 41.9（SD±9.2），差异有统计学意义（p<0.01）。
结论
干预后知识显著增加，突出了评估足底保护性感觉丧失的项目，这对预防糖尿病足至关重要。
Zotero 插件