Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Division of Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0183121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01831-21. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
The IR Biotyper and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) using ClinProTools software (MALDI-TOF MS-ClinProTools) are two novel typing methods that rely on the analysis of carbohydrate and peptide residues in intact bacterial cells. These two methods have shown promising results in the rapid and accurate typing of bacteria. In this study, we evaluated these novel typing methods in comparison with genotypic typing for cluster analysis of Burkholderia cenocepacia epidemic strain ET12, isolated from adult cystic fibrosis patients. Sixty-six isolates of B. cenocepacia were used in this study, 35 of which were identified as the ET12 strain and 31 as non-ET12 strains by repetitive-element PCR (rep-PCR). Twelve isolates were used for the creation of typing models using IR Biotyper and MALDI-TOF MS-ClinProTools, and 54 isolates were used for external validation of the typing models. The IR Biotyper linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model had a diagnostic sensitivity of 84.6% for typing the epidemic strain, ET12. At a cutoff of 70%, MALDI-TOF MS-ClinProTools had 87.5% diagnostic sensitivity in detecting the ET12 strain (1.00). Both methods had a diagnostic specificity of ≥80% for detecting the ET12 strain. In conclusion, IR Biotyper and MALDI-TOF MS-ClinProTools offer rapid typing using proteomics and analysis of small cellular molecules with a low running cost. Our pilot study showed suboptimal accuracy of both methods for typing outbreak strains of B. cenocepacia. Extending the spectral region analyzed by the IR Biotyper can improve the accuracy and has the potential of improving the generalizability of this technique for typing other organisms. Respiratory infections due to Burkholderia cenocepacia, particularly the ET12 epidemic strain, are considered sentinel events for persons with cystic fibrosis, as they are often associated with person-to-person transmission and accelerated decline in lung function and early mortality. Current typing methods are generally only available at reference centers, with long turn-around-times, which can affect the identification of outbreaks and critical patient triage. This pilot study aims to add to the growing literature illustrating the potential utility of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), a novel rapid method, for the successful typing of clinically significant bacteria. In this study, we evaluated its utility to discriminate between the ET12 clone and non-ET12 isolates of B. cenocepacia and compared it to proteomics cluster analysis using MALDI-TOF MS and ClinProTools software. Both methods had encouraging but suboptimal accuracy (≥85% sensitivity and ≥83% specificity), which will likely be improved by extending the spectral region analyzed by the IR Biotyper with updated software.
IR Biotyper 和基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)使用 ClinProTools 软件(MALDI-TOF MS-ClinProTools)是两种新型的分型方法,它们依赖于分析完整细菌细胞中的碳水化合物和肽残基。这两种方法在快速准确地对细菌进行分型方面显示出了很有前景的结果。在这项研究中,我们将这两种新型的分型方法与基因分型进行了比较,用于对从成年囊性纤维化患者中分离出的流行菌株伯克霍尔德氏菌中肠杆菌 ET12 进行聚类分析。本研究使用了 66 株伯克霍尔德氏菌,其中 35 株被鉴定为 ET12 菌株,31 株为非 ET12 菌株通过重复元件 PCR(rep-PCR)。使用 IR Biotyper 和 MALDI-TOF MS-ClinProTools 为 12 株分离物创建了分型模型,并用 54 株分离物对分型模型进行了外部验证。IR Biotyper 线性判别分析(LDA)模型对流行菌株 ET12 的分型具有 84.6%的诊断灵敏度。在截断值为 70%时,MALDI-TOF MS-ClinProTools 对检测 ET12 菌株的诊断灵敏度为 87.5%(1.00)。两种方法对检测 ET12 菌株的诊断特异性均≥80%。总之,IR Biotyper 和 MALDI-TOF MS-ClinProTools 提供了使用蛋白质组学和分析小分子的快速分型,运行成本低。我们的初步研究表明,这两种方法对伯克霍尔德氏菌中肠杆菌爆发株的分型准确性并不理想。扩展 IR Biotyper 分析的光谱区域可以提高准确性,并有可能提高该技术对其他生物体进行分型的通用性。由于伯克霍尔德氏菌引起的呼吸道感染,特别是 ET12 流行株,被认为是囊性纤维化患者的哨兵事件,因为它们通常与人际传播以及肺功能下降和早期死亡的加速有关。目前的分型方法通常仅在参考中心使用,周转时间较长,这可能会影响对暴发的识别和对关键患者的分诊。本初步研究旨在为傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)这一新型快速方法在成功对临床重要细菌进行分型方面的潜在应用提供更多文献。在这项研究中,我们评估了它在区分 ET12 克隆和非 ET12 分离株中的肠杆菌中的效用,并将其与 MALDI-TOF MS 和 ClinProTools 软件的蛋白质组聚类分析进行了比较。两种方法都具有令人鼓舞但不理想的准确性(≥85%的灵敏度和≥83%的特异性),通过使用更新的软件扩展 IR Biotyper 分析的光谱区域,其准确性可能会得到提高。