Suppr超能文献

使用探条与带管芯的气管插管对行气管插管的危重症患者首次插管成功的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube With Stylet on Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Among Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

JAMA. 2021 Dec 28;326(24):2488-2497. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22002.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

For critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation, failure to intubate the trachea on the first attempt occurs in up to 20% of cases and is associated with severe hypoxemia and cardiac arrest. Whether using a tracheal tube introducer ("bougie") increases the likelihood of successful intubation compared with using an endotracheal tube with stylet remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of use of a bougie vs an endotracheal tube with stylet on successful intubation on the first attempt.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Bougie or Stylet in Patients Undergoing Intubation Emergently (BOUGIE) trial was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial among 1102 critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation in 7 emergency departments and 8 intensive care units in the US between April 29, 2019, and February 14, 2021; the date of final follow-up was March 14, 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to use of a bougie (n = 556) or use of an endotracheal tube with stylet (n = 546).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt. The secondary outcome was the incidence of severe hypoxemia, defined as a peripheral oxygen saturation less than 80%.

RESULTS

Among 1106 patients randomized, 1102 (99.6%) completed the trial and were included in the primary analysis (median age, 58 years; 41.0% women). Successful intubation on the first attempt occurred in 447 patients (80.4%) in the bougie group and 453 patients (83.0%) in the stylet group (absolute risk difference, -2.6 percentage points [95% CI, -7.3 to 2.2]; P = .27). A total of 58 patients (11.0%) in the bougie group experienced severe hypoxemia, compared with 46 patients (8.8%) in the stylet group (absolute risk difference, 2.2 percentage points [95% CI, -1.6 to 6.0]). Esophageal intubation occurred in 4 patients (0.7%) in the bougie group and 5 patients (0.9%) in the stylet group, pneumothorax was present after intubation in 14 patients (2.5%) in the bougie group and 15 patients (2.7%) in the stylet group, and injury to oral, glottic, or thoracic structures occurred in 0 patients in the bougie group and 3 patients (0.5%) in the stylet group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation, use of a bougie did not significantly increase the incidence of successful intubation on the first attempt compared with use of an endotracheal tube with stylet.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03928925

摘要

重要性

对于接受紧急气管插管的危重症成人,首次尝试插管失败的发生率高达 20%,并与严重低氧血症和心脏骤停有关。与使用带管芯的气管内导管(“管芯”)相比,使用气管导管导丝是否能增加插管成功的可能性仍不确定。

目的

确定使用管芯与使用带管芯的气管内导管在首次尝试时插管成功的效果。

设计、地点和参与者:气管插管紧急患者使用管芯或管芯(BOUGIE)试验是一项多中心、随机临床试验,纳入了 2019 年 4 月 29 日至 2021 年 2 月 14 日期间美国 7 家急诊室和 8 家重症监护病房的 1102 名接受气管插管的危重症成人;最终随访日期为 2021 年 3 月 14 日。

干预措施

患者被随机分配使用管芯(n=556)或使用带管芯的气管内导管(n=546)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是首次尝试插管成功。次要结局是严重低氧血症的发生率,定义为外周血氧饱和度低于 80%。

结果

在随机分配的 1106 名患者中,1102 名(99.6%)完成了试验并纳入了主要分析(中位数年龄为 58 岁;41.0%为女性)。管芯组首次尝试插管成功的患者有 447 例(80.4%),管芯组有 453 例(83.0%)(绝对风险差异,-2.6 个百分点[95%CI,-7.3 至 2.2];P=0.27)。管芯组有 58 例(11.0%)患者发生严重低氧血症,而管芯组有 46 例(8.8%)患者发生严重低氧血症(绝对风险差异,2.2 个百分点[95%CI,-1.6 至 6.0])。管芯组有 4 例(0.7%)患者发生食管插管,管芯组有 5 例(0.9%)患者发生气胸,管芯组有 14 例(2.5%)患者在插管后发生气胸,管芯组有 0 例患者发生口腔、声门或胸部结构损伤,管芯组有 3 例(0.5%)患者发生口腔、声门或胸部结构损伤。

结论和相关性

在接受气管插管的危重症成人中,与使用带管芯的气管内导管相比,使用管芯并未显著增加首次尝试插管成功的发生率。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03928925

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Evidence-based Emergency Tracheal Intubation.循证医学指导下的紧急气管插管
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Jul;211(7):1156-1164. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202411-2165CI.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验