Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College , Beijing, 100730, China.
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 May 21;24(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02560-3.
Endotracheal intubation is challenging during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and video laryngoscopy has showed benefits for this procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of various intubation approaches, including the bougie first, preloaded bougie, endotracheal tube (ETT) with stylet, and ETT without stylet, on first-attempt success using video laryngoscopy during chest compression.
This was a randomized crossover trial conducted in a general tertiary teaching hospital. We included anesthesia residents in postgraduate year one to three who passed the screening test. Each resident performed intubation with video laryngoscopy using the four approaches in a randomized sequence on an adult manikin during continuous chest compression. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success defined as starting ventilation within a one minute.
A total of 260 endotracheal intubations conducted by 65 residents were randomized and analyzed with 65 procedures in each group. First-attempt success occurred in 64 (98.5%), 57 (87.7%), 56 (86.2%), and 46 (70.8%) intubations in the bougie-first, preloaded bougie, ETT with stylet, and ETT without stylet approaches, respectively. The bougie-first approach had a significantly higher possibility of first-attempt success than the preloaded bougie approach [risk ratio (RR) 8.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 62.16, P = 0.047], the ETT with stylet approach (RR 9.00, 95% CI 1.17 to 69.02, P = 0.035), and the ETT without stylet approach (RR 19.00, 95% CI 2.62 to 137.79, P = 0.004) in the generalized estimating equation logistic model accounting for clustering of intubations operated by the same resident. In addition, the bougie first approach did not result in prolonged intubation or increased self-reported difficulty among the study participants.
The bougie first approach with video laryngoscopy had the highest possibility of first-attempt success during chest compression. These results helped inform the intubation approach during CPR. However, further studies in an actual clinical environment are warranted to validate these findings.
Clinicaltrials.gov; identifier: NCT05689125; date: January 18, 2023.
心肺复苏期间进行气管插管具有挑战性,视频喉镜已显示出对此操作有益。本研究旨在比较各种插管方法的效果,包括使用引导管、预加载引导管、带管芯的气管内导管(ETT)和不带管芯的 ETT,在进行胸外按压时使用视频喉镜进行首次尝试成功。
这是一项在一家普通的三级教学医院进行的随机交叉试验。我们纳入了通过筛选测试的住院医师一年级至三年级的麻醉学住院医师。每位住院医师在成人模型上使用视频喉镜以随机顺序进行四种方法的插管,同时进行连续的胸外按压。主要结局是定义为在一分钟内开始通气的首次尝试成功。
共有 260 次气管插管由 65 名住院医师进行随机分组和分析,每组 65 次。引导管首先、预加载引导管、带管芯的 ETT 和不带管芯的 ETT 方法的首次尝试成功率分别为 64(98.5%)、57(87.7%)、56(86.2%)和 46(70.8%)。引导管首先方法的首次尝试成功率明显高于预加载引导管方法[风险比(RR)8.00,95%置信区间(CI)1.03 至 62.16,P=0.047]、带管芯的 ETT 方法(RR 9.00,95% CI 1.17 至 69.02,P=0.035)和不带管芯的 ETT 方法(RR 19.00,95% CI 2.62 至 137.79,P=0.004),在考虑到由同一位住院医师操作的插管聚类的广义估计方程逻辑模型中。此外,引导管首先方法并没有导致插管时间延长或研究参与者报告的难度增加。
在进行胸外按压时,使用视频喉镜的引导管首先方法首次尝试成功的可能性最高。这些结果有助于为心肺复苏期间的插管方法提供信息。然而,需要在实际临床环境中进行进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
Clinicaltrials.gov;标识符:NCT05689125;日期:2023 年 1 月 18 日。