• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用戊二醛基脱敏剂后对后牙复合树脂修复体的术后敏感性:一项随机临床试验。

Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing solution: A randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Dental School, Universidade de Pernambuco, Pernambuco, PE, Brazil; Instituto de Tecnologia de Pernambuco - ITEP/ Block B 1st floor. Av. Prof. Luis Freire, 700 - Cidade Universitária, Recife-PE, Brazil 50740-540.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Campus Uvaranas - Bloco M - 52B 2° Piso, General Carlos Cavalcanti Avenue, 4748 - Ponta Grossa - PR, 84030-900, Brazil.

出版信息

J Dent. 2022 Feb;117:103918. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103918. Epub 2021 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103918
PMID:34879245
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizer on the postoperative sensitivity (POS) in posterior resin composite restorations up to 12 months using a universal adhesive (Tetric N-Bond Universal) with selective enamel etching (SE) or an etch-and-rinse (ER) strategy.

METHODS

Class I and class II resin composite restorations (n = 220) at least 3 mm deep were inserted in 55 subjects. The universal adhesive was applied using the SE (self-etch strategy on dentin with selective enamel etching) or the ER strategy, with or without prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizer (Gluma Desensitizer - GL) to form groups SEGL and ERGL. A bulk-fill resin composite (Tetric NCeram Bulk Fill) was used for all restorations. Spontaneous POS was assessed 7 days after the restorative procedure using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). After 7, 14, and 30 days of completing each restoration, the subjects were reassessed to evaluate POS caused by stimulation with an air blast, horizontal and vertical percussion. In addition, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, fracture, and recurrence of caries were evaluated using the FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria after 7 days and at 12 months.

RESULTS

No significant spontaneous or stimuli-induced POS was observed when restorations with or without GL were compared (p>0.05). A higher risk of spontaneous POS was observed within 7 days (40.0%; 95% CI 28.1 to 53.1), without statistically significant differences among groups. None of the participants reported POS at 12 months, however five restorations were considered clinically unsatisfactory (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The previous application of GL did not significantly reduce spontaneous or stimuli-induced POS in posterior resin composite restorations at any time, regardless of the adhesive strategy used.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The use of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing agent did not generate lower incidence of postoperative sensitivity in resin composite posterior restorations.

摘要

目的

使用通用粘结剂(Tetric N-Bond Universal)联合选择性釉质酸蚀(SE)或酸蚀-冲洗(ER)技术,评估戊二醛基脱敏剂对术后敏感性(POS)的影响,研究对象为使用 SE 或 ER 技术并联合或不联合戊二醛基脱敏剂(Gluma Desensitizer-GL)的后牙复合树脂修复体,随访时间长达 12 个月。

方法

共纳入 55 名患者的 220 个 CLASS I 和 CLASS II 窝洞,深度至少 3mm。所有窝洞均使用通用粘结剂(Tetric N-Bond Universal)进行粘结,粘结方式包括 SE(自酸蚀粘结剂选择性酸蚀釉质)或 ER(酸蚀-冲洗粘结剂),联合或不联合戊二醛基脱敏剂(Gluma Desensitizer-GL)。所有修复体均使用块状充填复合树脂(Tetric NCeram Bulk Fill)。在修复后第 7 天,通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)和数字评分量表(NRS)评估自发性 POS,第 7、14 和 30 天评估空气刺激、水平和垂直叩诊刺激诱发的 POS。此外,在修复后第 7 天和 12 个月时,采用世界牙科联合会(FDI)标准评估边缘着色、边缘密合度、折裂和继发龋情况。

结果

无论是否使用 GL,修复体间自发性或刺激诱发的 POS 无显著差异(p>0.05)。第 7 天内自发性 POS 风险较高(40.0%;95%CI 28.1%至 53.1%),但各组间无统计学差异。所有患者在第 12 个月时均未报告 POS,但 5 个修复体被认为临床效果不佳(p>0.05)。

结论

在后牙复合树脂修复中,无论粘结方式如何,在任何时间点,使用 GL 预处理均不能显著降低自发性或刺激诱发的 POS。

临床意义

使用戊二醛基脱敏剂不能降低后牙复合树脂修复体的术后敏感性发生率。

相似文献

1
Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing solution: A randomized clinical trial.应用戊二醛基脱敏剂后对后牙复合树脂修复体的术后敏感性:一项随机临床试验。
J Dent. 2022 Feb;117:103918. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103918. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
2
Glutaraldehyde-based desensitizer does not influence postoperative sensitivity and clinical performance of posterior restorations: A 24-month randomized clinical trial.基于戊二醛的脱敏剂不会影响后牙修复的术后敏感性和临床性能:一项为期 24 个月的随机临床试验。
Dent Mater. 2023 Oct;39(10):946-956. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.08.179. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
3
Effect of Dentin Moisture in Posterior Restorations Performed with Universal Adhesive: A Randomized Clinical Trial.通用粘结剂在后牙修复中对牙本质水分的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Oper Dent. 2022 Mar 1;47(2):E91-E105. doi: 10.2341/20-215-C.
4
Clinical performance of posterior restorations using a universal adhesive over moist and dry dentin: A 36-month double-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial.通用粘结剂在潮湿和干燥牙本质上用于后牙修复的临床效果:一项 36 个月的双盲、劈裂随机临床试验。
J Dent. 2024 Aug;147:105080. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105080. Epub 2024 May 22.
5
Dentin moisture does not influence postoperative sensitivity in posterior restorations: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.牙本质湿度不影响后牙修复体的术后敏感性:一项双盲随机临床试验。
Am J Dent. 2020 Aug;33(4):206-212.
6
Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.不同通用型黏结剂在Ⅱ类大体积充填修复体中黏接策略的比较评价:一项 48 个月的随机对照试验。
J Dent. 2022 Feb;117:103921. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103921. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
7
Thirty-six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with an MDP-free universal adhesive system using different adhesive protocols: a randomized clinical trial.采用无 MDP 通用黏接系统和不同黏接方案对颈复合修复体进行 36 个月随访:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jun;26(6):4337-4350. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04397-x. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
8
Clinical evaluation of posterior restorations over wet and dry dentin using an etch-and-rinse adhesive: A 36-month randomized clinical trial.使用酸蚀冲洗型粘结剂对湿润和干燥牙本质进行的后牙修复的临床评估:一项为期 36 个月的随机临床试验。
Dent Mater. 2024 Apr;40(4):619-628. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.02.009. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
9
Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.牙本质粗糙度对非龋性颈病变粘结性能的影响:一项双盲随机临床试验。
J Dent. 2018 Feb;69:60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
10
5-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.后牙大块充填型树脂复合材料修复体 5 年临床效果:一项双盲随机对照临床试验
Dent Mater. 2023 Dec;39(12):1159-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.018. Epub 2023 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative clinical performance of universal adhesives versus etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives: a meta-analysis.通用型粘结剂与酸蚀冲洗型及自酸蚀粘结剂的临床性能比较:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jun 25;29(7):352. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06427-w.
2
Current approaches to produce durable biomaterials: Trends in polymeric materials for restorative dentistry applications.制备耐用生物材料的当前方法:用于口腔修复应用的聚合材料趋势。
Dent Mater. 2024 Dec;40(12):2122-2134. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.10.004. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
3
Impact of repeated preheating of bulk-fill resin composite on postoperative hypersensitivity; a randomized controlled clinical trial.
大块充填型树脂反复预热对术后敏感的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04170-4.
4
Patients´ satisfaction concerning direct anterior dental restoration.患者对直接前牙修复的满意度。
Braz Dent J. 2023 May-Jun;34(3):82-93. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202305260.
5
Effect of different adhesive systems on dental defects and sensitivity to teeth in composite resin restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同黏接系统对复合树脂修复牙齿缺损及敏感性的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jun;27(6):2495-2511. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05007-0. Epub 2023 Apr 5.