Suppr超能文献

评估认知障碍晚期的残留认知:残留认知评估。

Evaluating Residual Cognition in Advanced Cognitive Impairment: The Residual Cognition Assessment.

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Decline and Dementia, Carisma Foundation, Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2021;50(5):460-472. doi: 10.1159/000520322. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In nursing homes, most of the patients with dementia are affected by severe cognitive disorder. Care interventions follow an accurate and recurring multidimensional assessment, including cognitive status. There is still a need to develop new performance-based scales for moderate-to-advanced dementia.

OBJECTIVES

The development of the Residual Cognition Assessment (RCA) responds to the need to create new scales for global cognitive screening in advanced dementia, with some peculiar features: performance based, brief (<5 m), available without specific training, and suitable for nonverbal patients with minimal distress.

METHODS

Two raters have administered the RCA and the Severe Impairment Battery-short version (SIB-S) to 84 participants with MMSE = 0. After 2-3 weeks, the same sample has been retested. The RCA has been also administered to 40 participants with MMSE 1-10 for a comparison.

RESULTS

The RCA has exhibited excellent values for test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation [ICC] = 0.956) as well as for inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.997). The concurrent validity analyzes have shown strong correlations between the RCA and the SIB-S with ρ = 0.807 (p < 0.01), and the RCA and the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) with ρ = -0.663 (p < 0.01). Moderate correlation has been found between the RCA and the Functional Assessment Staging Scale with ρ = -0.435 (p < 0.01). The instrument has showed high internal reliability, too (total: α = 0.899). The RCA has low floor effect (2%) with respect to the SIB-S (58%) but shows ceiling effect in the MMSE 1-10 sample (50%). The ROC curve analyses demonstrate that the RCA is acceptably able to discriminate between subjects with CDR 4/5 with an AUC of 0.92. Exploratory factor analysis shows 3 factors, defined as three major degrees of cognitive performance in advanced dementia, indeed hierarchically structured in three possible levels of decline.

CONCLUSIONS

The RCA has showed excellent validity and reliability as well as good sensitivity to identify advanced cognitive impairment in dementia, without floor effect. The RCA seems complementary to the MMSE, so advisable when the latter reaches 0. Administration and scoring are simple, and only few minutes are required to assess the patient. The RCA can discriminate at least 3 different major stages in advanced dementias: severe, profound, and late.

摘要

背景

在养老院中,大多数痴呆症患者受到严重认知障碍的影响。护理干预措施遵循准确且反复的多维评估,包括认知状态。目前仍需要为中重度至重度痴呆症开发新的基于表现的量表。

目的

残留认知评估(RCA)的开发是为了满足在重度痴呆症中创建新的整体认知筛查量表的需求,其具有一些特殊特征:基于表现、简短(<5 分钟)、无需特定培训即可获得、适用于非言语患者且最小化痛苦。

方法

两名评估员对 84 名 MMSE=0 的参与者进行了 RCA 和严重损伤电池简短版(SIB-S)的评估。2-3 周后,对同一样本进行了重测。RCA 也对 40 名 MMSE 为 1-10 的参与者进行了评估,以进行比较。

结果

RCA 的重测信度(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.956)和评分者间信度(ICC=0.997)均表现出极好的值。同时效度分析显示,RCA 与 SIB-S 之间的相关性很强,ρ=0.807(p<0.01),与临床失智症评定量表(CDR)之间的相关性为ρ=-0.663(p<0.01)。RCA 与功能评估分期量表(Functional Assessment Staging Scale)之间的相关性为中度,ρ=-0.435(p<0.01)。该量表的内部信度也很高,总α系数为 0.899。RCA 与 SIB-S(58%)相比,地板效应低(2%),但在 MMSE 为 1-10 的样本中出现天花板效应(50%)。ROC 曲线分析表明,RCA 能够以接受的方式区分 CDR 为 4/5 的受试者,AUC 为 0.92。探索性因子分析显示,3 个因素被定义为重度痴呆中认知表现的三个主要程度,实际上是按三个可能的下降水平进行层次结构划分的。

结论

RCA 在识别痴呆症中的重度认知障碍方面表现出极好的有效性和可靠性,且具有良好的敏感性,没有地板效应。RCA 似乎与 MMSE 互补,因此在后者得分为 0 时是明智的选择。其评估和评分简单,评估患者只需几分钟。RCA 可区分重度痴呆的至少 3 个不同主要阶段:严重、深度和晚期。

相似文献

5
Validity of the Severe Impairment Battery Short Version.严重损伤量表简版的效度
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;80(9):954-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.163220. Epub 2009 May 21.
7
The Danish version of the Baylor Profound Mental State Examination.贝勒深度精神状态检查的丹麦语版本。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;66(3):198-202. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2011.614959. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
9
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].[法语使用者病前智力水平的评估]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x.

本文引用的文献

2
A Scale to Measure Impairment in Severe Dementia and Similar Conditions.一种用于测量重度痴呆及类似病症损伤程度的量表。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1996;4(3):247-251. doi: 10.1097/00019442-199622430-00008. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
7
Development of the Cognitive Test for Severe Dementia.重度痴呆认知测试的开发。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2015;40(1-2):94-106. doi: 10.1159/000430089. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
9
Should the mini-mental state examination be retired?简易精神状态检查表应该停用吗?
Neurologia. 2014 Oct;29(8):473-81. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验