Hall-Craggs M A, Lees W R
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Aug;147(2):399-403. doi: 10.2214/ajr.147.2.399.
Fine-needle aspiration biopsy was performed in 240 patients with suspected pancreatic or biliary tumors between 1978 and 1984. Between 1978 and 1982, using only sonographic guidance, the sensitivity of the technique was 66.7% for pancreatic and 40% for biliary tumors compared with 79.4% for carcinomas in other locations. The main reasons for failure to obtain positive cytology were small tumor size and sampling errors. From 1983 onward, combined sonographic and fluoroscopic biopsy guidance with opacification of the bile duct or pancreatic duct was routinely used together with heavier sedation to allow more careful needle placement. The sensitivity of the technique improved from 1983 to 1984 and was 77.5% for pancreatic tumors and 60% for biliary tumors. Failure of the cytologic technique to identify well-differentiated tumors and lymphomas has become a major source of tumor misdiagnosis.
1978年至1984年间,对240例疑似胰腺或胆管肿瘤患者进行了细针穿刺活检。1978年至1982年间,仅使用超声引导,该技术对胰腺肿瘤的敏感性为66.7%,对胆管肿瘤的敏感性为40%,而对其他部位癌的敏感性为79.4%。未能获得阳性细胞学结果的主要原因是肿瘤体积小和采样误差。从1983年起,常规使用超声和荧光镜联合活检引导,并对胆管或胰管进行造影,同时给予更深度的镇静,以便更精确地放置针头。该技术的敏感性在1983年至1984年间有所提高,对胰腺肿瘤的敏感性为77.5%,对胆管肿瘤的敏感性为60%。细胞学技术无法识别高分化肿瘤和淋巴瘤已成为肿瘤误诊的主要原因。