Xu Lun, Huang Wending, Cai Weiluo, Sun ZhengWang, Fang Meng, Ji Yingzheng, Wang Shuoer, Zhang Jianing, Hu Tu, Cheng Mo, Yan Wangjun
Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 22;8:686930. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.686930. eCollection 2021.
This study aimed to compare the outcomes between piecemeal spondylectomy and separation surgery for patients with spinal metastasis. Piecemeal spondylectomy and separation surgery are two widely-used treatment options for spinal metastasis. However, no studies have compared the surgical outcomes between both treatment modalities. Patients with spinal metastasis who underwent piecemeal spondylectomy or separation surgery between August 2017 and April 2020 at our spine center were recruited. Demographic, preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to analyze overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with spinal metastasis. Overall, 26 patients were treated with piecemeal spondylectomy, and 29 underwent separation surgery with postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery. Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in neurological status. The piecemeal spondylectomy group had significantly more blood loss (1784.62 ± 833.64 vs. 1165.52 ± 307.38 ml) and required longer operative time (4.76 ± 0.93 vs. 3.73 ± 1.15 h) than the separation surgery group. No significant difference in OS was found between the groups ( = 0.064); however, patients in the separation surgery group experienced less local recurrence than those in the piecemeal spondylectomy group ( = 0.0014). Notably, significant differences were detected in the development of complications between the groups ( = 0.029). Separation surgery led to less blood loss and reduced complications and had shorter operation time than piecemeal spondylectomy. Although no significant differences were found in OS between the groups, separation surgery was associated with better PFS compared with piecemeal spondylectomy. These findings suggest that separation surgery has some advantages over piecemeal spondylectomy for patients with spinal metastatic disease.
本研究旨在比较碎块式椎体切除术与分离手术治疗脊柱转移瘤患者的疗效。碎块式椎体切除术和分离手术是脊柱转移瘤两种广泛应用的治疗选择。然而,尚无研究比较这两种治疗方式的手术效果。招募了2017年8月至2020年4月在我院脊柱中心接受碎块式椎体切除术或分离手术的脊柱转移瘤患者。收集并分析了患者的人口统计学、术前、围手术期及随访数据。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和对数秩检验分析脊柱转移瘤患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。总体而言,26例患者接受了碎块式椎体切除术,29例接受了分离手术及术后立体定向放射治疗。两组患者术后神经功能均有显著改善。碎块式椎体切除术组的失血量(1784.62±833.64 vs. 1165.52±307.38 ml)显著多于分离手术组,手术时间(4.76±0.93 vs. 3.73±1.15 h)也更长。两组患者的OS无显著差异( = 0.064);然而,分离手术组患者的局部复发率低于碎块式椎体切除术组( = 0.0014)。值得注意的是,两组患者并发症的发生情况存在显著差异( = 0.029)。与碎块式椎体切除术相比,分离手术导致的失血量更少,并发症减少,手术时间更短。虽然两组患者的OS无显著差异,但与碎块式椎体切除术相比,分离手术的PFS更佳。这些研究结果表明,对于脊柱转移性疾病患者,分离手术相对于碎块式椎体切除术具有一些优势。