Department of Orthopedics, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan;14(1):111-118. doi: 10.1111/os.13165. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
To compare the effectiveness and practicality of pedicle screw fixation via the Quadrant retractor and Buck's technique in the treatment of adolescent spondylolysis.
A total of 31 patients who underwent pedicle screw fixation or Buck's technique at our hospital from 2012 to 2017 were selected for this retrospective study. The patients were divided into a pedicle screw group (16 patients) and a Buck's technique group (15 patients) according to surgical procedure. Age, sex, disease duration, involved segments, preoperative Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for low back pain (LBP), intraoperative blood loss, incision length, operative time and length of hospital stay were documented. ODI scores, VAS scores for LBP and fusion rates at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 3 years postoperatively were used to evaluate surgical outcomes.
The average follow-up period was 32.75 ± 11.99 months in the pedicle screw group and 31.02 ± 9.64 months in the Buck's technique group. No significant differences in demographic data and perioperative data were found between the two groups (P > 0.05). The ODI scores and VAS scores for LBP in both groups were significantly improved at 3 years postoperatively compared with the values before surgery (ODI%: 45.74 ± 2.47 vs 10.99 ± 3.00; 45.29 ± 6.94 vs 15.73 ± 6.89. VAS: 5.94 ± 0.68 vs 1.50 ± 0.52; 6.13 ± 0.74 vs 2.13 ± 0.92, P < 0.05). The ODI scores of the patients in the pedicle screw group at 1 month to 3 years postoperatively were lower than those of the patients in the Buck's technique group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the VAS scores for LBP of the patients in the pedicle screw group at 6 months and 3 years postoperatively were lower than those of the patients in the Buck's technique group (P < 0.05). No significant difference in the VAS scores for LBP was found between the two groups at 1 month postoperatively (3.88 ± 0.50 vs 4.20 ± 0.56, P = 0.10). Three years postoperatively, good fusion of the pars interarticularis was achieved in all patients in the pedicle screw group, but four patients in the Buck's technique group did not achieve good fusion (P = 0.02).
Both pedicle screw fixation and Buck's technique can achieve good outcomes in the treatment of adolescent spondylolysis. Pedicle screw fixation via the Quadrant retractor for the treatment of spondylolysis is associated with more satisfactory effects in terms of LBP relief and fusion results.
比较 Quadrant 通道下经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定与 Buck 技术治疗青少年峡部裂性脊柱滑脱的疗效和实用性。
回顾性分析 2012 年至 2017 年我院采用经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定或 Buck 技术治疗的 31 例患者的临床资料,根据手术方式将患者分为椎弓根螺钉组(16 例)和 Buck 技术组(15 例)。记录患者的年龄、性别、病程、受累节段、术前 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、腰痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术中出血量、切口长度、手术时间和住院时间。采用 ODI 评分、腰痛 VAS 评分及术后 1 个月、6 个月、1 年、3 年的融合率评估手术效果。
椎弓根螺钉组平均随访 32.75±11.99 个月,Buck 技术组平均随访 31.02±9.64 个月。两组患者的一般资料和围手术期资料比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后 3 年的 ODI 评分和腰痛 VAS 评分均明显优于术前(ODI%:45.74±2.47 比 10.99±3.00;45.29±6.94 比 15.73±6.89;VAS:5.94±0.68 比 1.50±0.52;6.13±0.74 比 2.13±0.92,P<0.05)。术后 1 个月至 3 年,椎弓根螺钉组患者的 ODI 评分均低于 Buck 技术组(P<0.05)。此外,椎弓根螺钉组患者术后 6 个月和 3 年的腰痛 VAS 评分均低于 Buck 技术组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后 1 个月的腰痛 VAS 评分比较差异无统计学意义(3.88±0.50 比 4.20±0.56,P=0.10)。术后 3 年,椎弓根螺钉组所有患者的峡部均获得良好融合,而 Buck 技术组有 4 例患者未获得良好融合(P=0.02)。
经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定和 Buck 技术治疗青少年峡部裂性脊柱滑脱均能取得良好的效果。Quadrant 通道下经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗峡部裂性脊柱滑脱,在缓解腰痛和融合效果方面具有更满意的效果。