Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Speech and Language Therapy, Portsmouth University Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jan;57(1):172-181. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12685. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
Mental capacity legislation in the UK is designed to safeguard the rights of people who may need support, or may be unable, to make autonomous decisions. Very limited evidence has been published about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the application of mental capacity legislation and, to our knowledge, none on the ability of speech and language therapists (SLTs) to support people with communication disabilities to engage in decision-making.
To describe how UK SLTs supported people with communication disabilities to make decisions and participate in mental capacity assessments, best interests decision-making and advance care planning during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: This descriptive, cross-sectional study used an online survey to collect quantitative and qualitative data about SLTs' practice experiences between August and November 2020. SLTs working with a range of adult clinical populations in different care settings were sampled purposively from all UK jurisdictions. Participants were recruited through professional networks and social media. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analysed thematically.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Data were collected from 107 SLTs working in a range of settings across all four UK nations. The sample included SLTs working with people with neurological conditions, learning disabilities, mental health conditions and acute confusion. The need for SLT support appeared to increase during the pandemic. Most respondents were still able to offer support; however, the amount and nature of support varied. Quality of support was impacted by adjustments associated with social distancing and infection control restrictions. Personal protective equipment (PPE) was identified as a barrier to communication. Indirect working methods (e.g., telehealth) were inaccessible to some people with communication disabilities. Most respondents felt confident that legal requirements were upheld, but suggested this group was less able to engage in decision-making and had reduced access to support to manage their own health conditions.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Some SLT services were limited in their ability to meet the decision-making support needs of people with communication disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic due to structural and systemic barriers. This suggests that existing inequities in the provision of care for people with communication disabilities in the UK were amplified during the pandemic.
What is already known on the subject People with communication disabilities may require support from healthcare professionals, including SLTs, to make decisions and communicate their wishes and preferences about their care, in line with mental capacity legislation. There is a lack of published evidence relating to how changes in staff deployment and resource during the COVID-19 pandemic may have impacted on the ability of SLTs to provide this support. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study provides novel evidence about the ways in which UK SLTs supported people with communication disabilities to engage in mental capacity assessments, best interests decision-making and advance care planning during the COVID-19 pandemic. In some cases, the amount and quality of decision-making support available was affected negatively due to changes in healthcare delivery and resource management and SLT working practices. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This study suggests that some people with communication disabilities experienced greater barriers to receiving professional support to maximize their autonomy and manage their health conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Speech and language therapy services and healthcare commissioners should consider how best to ensure equitable service delivery to this population in resource-limited situations.
英国的精神能力立法旨在保护那些可能需要支持或可能无法自主做出决策的人的权利。关于 COVID-19 大流行对精神能力立法的应用的影响,我们仅发现了非常有限的证据,而且据我们所知,关于言语和语言治疗师(SLTs)支持有沟通障碍的人参与决策的能力的证据也很少。
描述英国 SLTs 在 COVID-19 大流行期间如何支持有沟通障碍的人做出决策并参与精神能力评估、最佳利益决策和预先护理计划。
本描述性、横断面研究使用在线调查收集了 2020 年 8 月至 11 月期间 SLTs 实践经验的定量和定性数据。从英国所有司法管辖区的各种临床人群中,有目的地从各种成人临床环境中抽取 SLTs 进行抽样。通过专业网络和社交媒体招募参与者。使用描述性统计数据总结定量数据。定性数据采用主题分析进行分析。
数据来自在英国四个国家的各种环境中工作的 107 名 SLTs。样本包括与神经系统疾病、学习障碍、心理健康状况和急性意识障碍患者合作的 SLTs。在大流行期间,对 SLT 支持的需求似乎有所增加。大多数受访者仍然能够提供支持;然而,支持的数量和性质有所不同。支持的质量受到与社会距离和感染控制限制相关的调整的影响。个人防护设备(PPE)被确定为沟通的障碍。一些有沟通障碍的人无法使用间接工作方法(例如远程医疗)。大多数受访者认为法律要求得到了遵守,但他们认为该群体更难以参与决策,并且获得管理自身健康状况的支持的机会减少。
由于结构性和系统性障碍,一些 SLT 服务在 COVID-19 大流行期间满足有沟通障碍的人决策支持需求的能力有限。这表明,英国在提供有沟通障碍的人护理方面存在的不平等现象在大流行期间加剧了。
关于这一主题的已知内容:有沟通障碍的人可能需要医疗保健专业人员(包括言语和语言治疗师)的支持,以根据精神能力立法做出决策并表达他们对自己护理的意愿和偏好。关于大流行期间工作人员部署和资源变化如何可能影响 SLTs 提供这种支持的能力,缺乏已发表的证据。
本文对现有知识的补充:本研究提供了英国 SLTs 在 COVID-19 大流行期间支持有沟通障碍的人参与精神能力评估、最佳利益决策和预先护理计划的新证据。在某些情况下,由于医疗保健提供和资源管理以及 SLT 工作实践的变化,可用的决策支持的数量和质量受到负面影响。
临床意义或潜在应用:这项研究表明,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,一些有沟通障碍的人在获得专业支持以最大程度地提高自主权和管理自身健康状况方面遇到了更大的障碍。言语和语言治疗服务和医疗保健专员应考虑如何在资源有限的情况下确保向这一人群提供公平的服务。