• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Best interests versus resource allocation: could COVID-19 cloud decision-making for the cognitively impaired?最佳利益与资源分配:认知障碍患者的决策是否会因 COVID-19 而受到影响?
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):447-450. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106323. Epub 2020 May 6.
2
Tragic choices in intensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic: on fairness, consistency and community.COVID-19 大流行期间重症监护中的悲惨选择:关于公平、一致性和社区。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Oct;46(10):646-651. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106487. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
3
Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.新冠疫情期间稀缺医疗资源的公平分配
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Allocation of scarce resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Jewish ethical perspective.COVID-19 大流行期间稀缺资源的分配:犹太伦理视角。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):444-446. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106242. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
5
Physician preparedness for resource allocation decisions under pandemic conditions: A cross-sectional survey of Canadian physicians, April 2020.大流行条件下资源分配决策的医师准备情况:2020 年 4 月对加拿大医师的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0238842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238842. eCollection 2020.
6
Experiencing Community in a Covid Surge.在新冠疫情高峰期体验社区。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50(3):10-11. doi: 10.1002/hast.1109. Epub 2020 May 5.
7
Medical Ethics and Ventilator Allocation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的医学伦理与呼吸机分配
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2020 Jul 16;22(4):20com02687. doi: 10.4088/PCC.20com02687.
8
Ethical Challenges Arising in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Overview from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors (ABPD) Task Force.《COVID-19 大流行中出现的伦理挑战:来自生物伦理计划主任协会 (ABPD) 工作组的概述》。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jul;20(7):15-27. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1764138. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
9
What Could "Fair Allocation" during the Covid-19 Crisis Possibly Mean in Sub-Saharan Africa?在撒哈拉以南非洲,“公平分配”在新冠疫情危机中可能意味着什么?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50(3):33-35. doi: 10.1002/hast.1129.
10
Ethics in the Covid-19 emergency: Examining rationing decisions.新冠疫情紧急情况下的伦理:审视资源分配决策。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2020 Apr-Jun;V(2):168-169. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2020.049.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral Decision-Making in Healthcare and Medical Professions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间医疗保健及医疗行业中的道德决策
Trends Psychol. 2023;31(1):210-230. doi: 10.1007/s43076-021-00118-7. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
2
Fair allocation of resources in the moral dilemma of triage.分诊道德困境中的资源公平分配。
Front Sociol. 2025 May 13;10:1570940. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1570940. eCollection 2025.
3
Putting ICU triage guidelines into practice: A simulation study using observations and interviews.将 ICU 分诊指南付诸实践:使用观察和访谈进行的模拟研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0286978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286978. eCollection 2023.
4
Polarized Citizen Preferences for the Ethical Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in 20 Countries.20个国家民众对稀缺医疗资源伦理分配的两极化偏好
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Jul 25;7(2):23814683221113573. doi: 10.1177/23814683221113573. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
5
COVID-19 and the Mental Capacity Act in care homes: Perspectives from capacity professionals.新冠疫情与养老院的《精神能力法案》:来自能力专业人士的观点。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e3018-e3028. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13747. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
6
Why catastrophic events, human enhancement and progress in robotics may limit individual health rights.为什么灾难性事件、人类增强和机器人技术的进步可能会限制个人健康权。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2022 Dec;40(2):219-230. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00150-4. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
7
Mental capacity legislation and communication disability: A cross-sectional survey exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of specialist decision-making support by UK SLTs.精神能力立法和沟通障碍:一项横断面调查,旨在探讨 COVID-19 大流行对英国言语治疗师提供专业决策支持的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jan;57(1):172-181. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12685. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
8
Lockdown-Related Disparities Experienced by People with Disabilities during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review with Thematic Analysis.锁定相关的残疾在第一波的 COVID-19 大流行期间的经验差距:范围审查与主题分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 8;18(12):6178. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126178.
9
Principles for pandemics: COVID-19 and professional ethical guidance in England and Wales.大流行的原则:英格兰和威尔士的新冠疫情与专业伦理指南
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 24;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00643-1.
10
Health Risks and Consequences of a COVID-19 Infection for People with Disabilities: Scoping Review and Descriptive Thematic Analysis.残疾人群 COVID-19 感染的健康风险和后果:范围综述和描述性主题分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;18(8):4348. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084348.

本文引用的文献

1
Capacity in the time of Coronavirus.新冠病毒时期的能力。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 May-Jun;70:101560. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101560. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
2
ICU triage in an impending crisis: uncertainty, pre-emption and preparation.即将到来的危机中的重症监护病房分诊:不确定性、预防与准备
J Med Ethics. 2020 May;46(5):287-288. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106226. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
3
Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.新冠疫情期间稀缺医疗资源的公平分配
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Advance Care Planning in Cognitively Impaired Older Adults.认知障碍老年人的预先医疗指示计划。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1469-1474. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15471.
5
Nursing Roles and Strategies in End-of-Life Decision Making in Acute Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature.急性护理中临终决策的护理角色与策略:文献系统综述
Nurs Res Pract. 2011;2011:527834. doi: 10.1155/2011/527834. Epub 2011 Oct 2.
6
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.《残疾人权利公约》
Eur J Health Law. 2007 Nov;14(3):281-98. doi: 10.1515/9783110208856.203.

最佳利益与资源分配:认知障碍患者的决策是否会因 COVID-19 而受到影响?

Best interests versus resource allocation: could COVID-19 cloud decision-making for the cognitively impaired?

机构信息

Centre for Ethics in Medicine, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Centre for Ethics in Medicine, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):447-450. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106323. Epub 2020 May 6.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2020-106323
PMID:32376717
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7239662/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is putting the NHS under unprecedented pressure, requiring clinicians to make uncomfortable decisions they would not ordinarily face. These decisions revolve primarily around intensive care and whether a patient should undergo invasive ventilation. Certain vulnerable populations have featured in the media as falling victim to an increasingly utilitarian response to the pandemic-primarily those of advanced years or with serious existing health conditions. Another vulnerable population potentially at risk is those who lack the capacity to make their own care decisions. Owing to the pandemic, there are increased practical and normative challenges to following the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Both capacity assessments and best interests decisions may prove more difficult in the current situation. This may create a more paternalistic situation in decisions about the care of the cognitively impaired which is at risk of taking on a utilitarian focus. We look to these issues and consider whether there is a risk of patients who lack capacity to make their own care decisions being short-changed.

摘要

COVID-19 大流行给 NHS 带来了前所未有的压力,要求临床医生做出他们通常不会面临的不舒服的决定。这些决定主要围绕着重症监护和患者是否应该接受有创通气。某些弱势群体在媒体上成为了越来越功利应对大流行的受害者,主要是那些年龄较大或有严重现有健康状况的人。另一个潜在的弱势群体是那些没有能力做出自己的护理决策的人。由于大流行,遵守 2005 年《精神能力法案》的要求面临着更大的实际和规范挑战。在当前情况下,能力评估和最佳利益决策可能会更加困难。这可能会在认知障碍患者的护理决策中造成一种更具家长式作风的情况,这种情况有陷入功利主义焦点的风险。我们关注这些问题,并考虑是否存在缺乏能力做出自己护理决策的患者受到不利对待的风险。