Centre for Ethics in Medicine, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Centre for Ethics in Medicine, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):447-450. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106323. Epub 2020 May 6.
The COVID-19 pandemic is putting the NHS under unprecedented pressure, requiring clinicians to make uncomfortable decisions they would not ordinarily face. These decisions revolve primarily around intensive care and whether a patient should undergo invasive ventilation. Certain vulnerable populations have featured in the media as falling victim to an increasingly utilitarian response to the pandemic-primarily those of advanced years or with serious existing health conditions. Another vulnerable population potentially at risk is those who lack the capacity to make their own care decisions. Owing to the pandemic, there are increased practical and normative challenges to following the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Both capacity assessments and best interests decisions may prove more difficult in the current situation. This may create a more paternalistic situation in decisions about the care of the cognitively impaired which is at risk of taking on a utilitarian focus. We look to these issues and consider whether there is a risk of patients who lack capacity to make their own care decisions being short-changed.
COVID-19 大流行给 NHS 带来了前所未有的压力,要求临床医生做出他们通常不会面临的不舒服的决定。这些决定主要围绕着重症监护和患者是否应该接受有创通气。某些弱势群体在媒体上成为了越来越功利应对大流行的受害者,主要是那些年龄较大或有严重现有健康状况的人。另一个潜在的弱势群体是那些没有能力做出自己的护理决策的人。由于大流行,遵守 2005 年《精神能力法案》的要求面临着更大的实际和规范挑战。在当前情况下,能力评估和最佳利益决策可能会更加困难。这可能会在认知障碍患者的护理决策中造成一种更具家长式作风的情况,这种情况有陷入功利主义焦点的风险。我们关注这些问题,并考虑是否存在缺乏能力做出自己护理决策的患者受到不利对待的风险。