Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Stichting Hemato-Oncologie voor Volwassenen Nederland Data Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Blood Adv. 2022 Feb 22;6(4):1115-1125. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005624.
Clofarabine (CLO) is a nucleoside analog with efficacy in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This randomized phase 3 study aimed to evaluate whether CLO added to induction and whether consolidation would improve outcome in adults with newly diagnosed ALL. Treatment of younger (18-40 years) patients consisted of a pediatric-inspired protocol, and for older patients (41-70 years), a semi-intensive protocol was used. Three hundred and forty patients were randomized. After a median follow-up of 70 months, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 50% and 53% for arm A and B (CLO arm). For patients ≤40 years, EFS was 58% vs 65% in arm A vs B, whereas in patients >40 years, EFS was 43% in both arms. Complete remission (CR) rate was 89% in both arms and similar in younger and older patients. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in 200 patients (60%). Fifty-four of 76 evaluable patients (71%) were MRD- after consolidation 1 in arm A vs 75/81 (93%) in arm B (P = .001). Seventy (42%) patients proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in both arms. Five-year overall survival (OS) was similar in both arms: 60% vs 61%. Among patients achieving CR, relapse rates were 28% and 24%, and nonrelapse mortality was 16% vs 17% after CR. CLO-treated patients experienced more serious adverse events, more infections, and more often went off protocol. This was most pronounced in older patients. We conclude that, despite a higher rate of MRD negativity, addition of CLO does not improve outcome in adults with ALL, which might be due to increased toxicity. This trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl as #NTR2004.
克拉屈滨(CLO)是一种核苷类似物,在复发/难治性急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)中具有疗效。这项随机的 3 期研究旨在评估在新诊断的 ALL 成人患者中,CLO 是否可联合诱导治疗和巩固治疗来改善结果。年轻(18-40 岁)患者接受了一种以儿科方案为灵感的方案治疗,而年龄较大(41-70 岁)的患者接受了半强化方案。340 名患者被随机分配。中位随访 70 个月后,A 组和 B 组(CLO 组)的 5 年无事件生存率(EFS)分别为 50%和 53%。对于≤40 岁的患者,A 组的 EFS 为 58%,B 组为 65%,而对于>40 岁的患者,两组的 EFS 均为 43%。两组的完全缓解(CR)率均为 89%,且在年轻和老年患者中相似。微小残留病(MRD)在 200 名患者(60%)中进行了评估。在 A 组中,76 名可评估患者中有 54 名(71%)在巩固 1 后达到 MRD-,而在 B 组中有 75/81 名(93%)(P =.001)。两组各有 70 名(42%)患者进行了异基因造血干细胞移植。两组的 5 年总生存率(OS)相似:60%与 61%。在达到 CR 的患者中,缓解率分别为 28%和 24%,CR 后非复发死亡率分别为 16%和 17%。接受 CLO 治疗的患者经历了更多的严重不良事件、感染,且更频繁地偏离方案。这在年龄较大的患者中更为明显。我们得出结论,尽管 MRD 阴性率更高,但在 ALL 成人患者中添加 CLO 并不能改善结果,这可能是由于毒性增加所致。该试验在 www.trialregister.nl 上注册,编号为 NTR2004。