Suppr超能文献

在急诊科越来越多地使用气管插管安全检查表。

Increasing use of an endotracheal intubation safety checklist in the emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK

Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Dec;10(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001575.

Abstract

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a high-risk procedure often performed in the emergency department (ED) in critically unwell patients. The fourth National Audit Project by The Royal College of Anaesthetists found the risk of adverse events is much higher when performing the intervention in this setting compared with a theatre suite, and therefore use of a safety checklist is recommended. This quality improvement project was set in a large teaching hospital in the North West of the UK, where anaesthesia and intensive care clinicians are responsible for performing this procedure. A retrospective baseline audit indicated checklist use was 16.7% of applicable cases. The project aim was to increase the incidence of checklist use in the ED to 90% within a 6-month period. The model for improvement was used as a methodological approach to the problem along with other quality improvement tools, including a driver diagram to generate change ideas. The interventions were targeted at three broad areas: awareness of the checklist and expectation of use, building a favourable view of the benefits of the checklist and increasing the likelihood it would be remembered to use the checklist in the correct moment. After implementation checklist use increased to 84%. In addition, run chart analysis indicated a pattern of nonrandom variation in the form of a shift. This coincided with the period shortly after the beginning of the interventions. The changes were viewed favourably by junior and senior anaesthetists, as well as operating department practitioners and ED staff. Limitations of the project were that some suitable cases were likely missed due to the method of capture and lack of anonymous qualitative feedback on the changes made. Overall, however, it was shown the combination of low-cost interventions made was effective in increasing checklist use when performing emergency ETI in the ED.

摘要

气管插管(ETI)是一项在危急重症患者的急诊科经常进行的高风险操作。皇家麻醉师学院的第四次国家审计项目发现,与手术室相比,在该环境下进行干预时,不良事件的风险要高得多,因此建议使用安全检查表。这个质量改进项目是在英国西北部的一家大型教学医院进行的,麻醉和重症监护临床医生负责进行该程序。回顾性基线审核表明,检查表的使用在适用病例中占 16.7%。该项目的目标是在 6 个月内将 ED 中检查表的使用发生率提高到 90%。改进模型被用作解决问题的方法学方法,同时还使用了其他质量改进工具,包括驱动图来产生变革思路。干预措施针对三个广泛的领域:检查表的意识和使用期望,建立对检查表益处的有利看法,并增加在正确时刻记住使用检查表的可能性。实施后,检查表的使用增加到 84%。此外,运行图表分析表明存在一种非随机变化的模式,表现为一种转移。这与干预措施开始后的短时间内相符。初级和高级麻醉师以及手术部门从业人员和 ED 工作人员对这些变化持赞成态度。该项目的局限性在于,由于捕获方法和对所做变更的匿名定性反馈的缺乏,可能会遗漏一些合适的病例。然而,总体而言,事实证明,当在 ED 中进行紧急 ETI 时,使用低成本干预措施的组合可有效提高检查表的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a15/8663106/1eda27360659/bmjoq-2021-001575f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验