Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine and Allergy/Immunology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine New Orleans, New Orleans, LA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Chest. 2018 Apr;153(4):816-824. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.1163. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
Hypoxemia and hypotension are common complications during endotracheal intubation of critically ill adults. Verbal performance of a written, preintubation checklist may prevent these complications. We compared a written, verbally performed, preintubation checklist with usual care regarding lowest arterial oxygen saturation or lowest systolic BP experienced by critically ill adults undergoing endotracheal intubation.
A multicenter trial in which 262 adults undergoing endotracheal intubation were randomized to a written, verbally performed, preintubation checklist (checklist) or no preintubation checklist (usual care). The coprimary outcomes were lowest arterial oxygen saturation and lowest systolic BP between the time of procedural medication administration and 2 min after endotracheal intubation.
The median lowest arterial oxygen saturation was 92% (interquartile range [IQR], 79-98) in the checklist group vs 93% (IQR, 84-100) with usual care (P = .34). The median lowest systolic BP was 112 mm Hg (IQR, 94-133) in the checklist group vs 108 mm Hg (IQR, 90-132) in the usual care group (P = .61). There was no difference between the checklist and usual care in procedure duration (120 vs 118 s; P = .49), number of laryngoscopy attempts (one vs one attempt; P = .42), or severe life-threatening procedural complications (40.8% vs 32.6%; P = .20).
The verbal performance of a written, preprocedure checklist does not increase the lowest arterial oxygen saturation or lowest systolic BP during endotracheal intubation of critically ill adults compared with usual care.
ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02497729; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
低氧血症和低血压是危重症成人气管插管时常见的并发症。在气管插管前进行书面口头检查表的操作可能会预防这些并发症。我们比较了在接受气管插管的危重症成人中,书面口头执行的预插管检查表与常规护理(最低动脉血氧饱和度或最低收缩压)。
一项多中心试验,其中 262 名接受气管插管的成年人被随机分为书面口头执行的预插管检查表(检查表)组或无预插管检查表(常规护理)组。主要转归是程序性药物给药至气管插管后 2 分钟之间的最低动脉血氧饱和度和最低收缩压。
检查表组的最低动脉血氧饱和度中位数为 92%(四分位距[IQR],79-98),常规护理组为 93%(IQR,84-100)(P=.34)。检查表组的最低收缩压中位数为 112mmHg(IQR,94-133),常规护理组为 108mmHg(IQR,90-132)(P=.61)。检查表和常规护理在手术持续时间(120 与 118 秒;P=.49)、喉镜尝试次数(一次与一次尝试;P=.42)或严重危及生命的手术并发症(40.8%与 32.6%;P=.20)方面均无差异。
与常规护理相比,在危重症成人气管插管期间,口头执行书面术前检查表不会增加最低动脉血氧饱和度或最低收缩压。
ClinicalTrials.gov;编号:NCT02497729;网址:www.clinicaltrials.gov。