Mulia Eka P B, Amadis Muhammad R, Julario Rerdin, Dharmadjati Budi B
Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga - Dr. Soetomo General Hospital Surabaya Indonesia.
J Arrhythm. 2021 Sep 20;37(6):1578-1584. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12638. eCollection 2021 Dec.
For patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmia, cardiac pacing is the only appropriate treatment option. Electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony caused by traditional right ventricular apical pacing leads to left ventricular dysfunction and atrial arrhythmias. Physiological pacing stimulates natural cardiac conduction, resulting in synchronized ventricular contraction. Even if His bundle pacing (HBP) is an ideal physiological pacing modality, it is technically not always feasible because of high capture thresholds, disease in the distal His bundle, and follow-up troubleshooting issues. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has been proposed as a viable alternative to HBP since it provides lead stability, a low and stable pacing threshold, and correction of distal conduction system disease.
对于有症状的缓慢性心律失常患者,心脏起搏是唯一合适的治疗选择。传统右心室心尖部起搏引起的电和机械不同步会导致左心室功能障碍和房性心律失常。生理性起搏刺激心脏自然传导,从而实现心室同步收缩。即使希氏束起搏(HBP)是一种理想的生理性起搏方式,但由于捕获阈值高、希氏束远端病变以及随访故障排除问题,在技术上并非总是可行。左束支起搏(LBBP)已被提议作为HBP的可行替代方案,因为它能提供电极稳定性、低且稳定的起搏阈值,并纠正远端传导系统疾病。