Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Cancer Med. 2022 Feb;11(3):705-714. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4476. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
This study was conducted to compare the reported adverse event (AE) profiles and unexpected use of medical services during chemotherapy between before and after the healthcare reimbursement of AE evaluation in patients with cancer.
Using the electronic medical record database system, extracted patients with breast, lung, gastric, and colorectal cancers receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy between September 2013 and December 2016 at four centers in Korea were matched using the 1:1 greedy method: pre-reimbursement group (n = 1084) and post-reimbursement group (n = 1084). Unexpected outpatient department (OPD), emergency room (ER) visit, hospitalization rates, and chemotherapy completion rates were compared between the groups.
The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the groups. By chemotherapy cycle, hospitalization (1.8% vs. 2.3%; p = 0.039), and ER visit rates (3.3% vs. 3.9%; p = 0.064) were lower in the post-reimbursement group than that in the pre-reimbursement group. In particular, since cycle 2, ER visit and hospitalization rates were significantly lower in the post-reimbursement group than those in the pre-reimbursement group (2.6% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.020 and 1.4% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.007, respectively), although no significant differences were observed during cycle 1. The OPD visit rates were similar between both groups, regardless of cycles. The post-reimbursement group had a higher proportion of patients who completed chemotherapy as planned than the pre-reimbursement group (93.5% vs. 90.1%; p = 0.006). Post-reimbursement group had more AEs reported, including alopecia, fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia, and peripheral neuropathy, during cycle 1 than the pre-reimbursement group, which significantly decreased after cycle 2.
The introduction of healthcare reimbursement for AE evaluation may help physicians capture and appropriately manage AEs, consequently, decreasing hospital utilization and increasing chemotherapy completion rates.
本研究旨在比较癌症患者化疗前后医疗报销中不良事件(AE)评估后报告的 AE 情况和意外医疗服务使用情况。
使用电子病历数据库系统,在韩国的四个中心提取 2013 年 9 月至 2016 年 12 月期间接受新辅助或辅助化疗的乳腺癌、肺癌、胃癌和结直肠癌患者,采用 1:1 贪婪方法进行匹配:预报销组(n=1084)和报销后组(n=1084)。比较两组之间意外门诊(OPD)、急诊(ER)就诊、住院率和化疗完成率。
两组间的基线特征平衡良好。按化疗周期,报销后组的住院率(1.8% vs. 2.3%;p=0.039)和 ER 就诊率(3.3% vs. 3.9%;p=0.064)低于报销前组。特别是从第 2 周期开始,报销后组的 ER 就诊和住院率明显低于报销前组(2.6% vs. 3.3%;p=0.020 和 1.4% vs. 2.0%;p=0.007),而第 1 周期无显著差异。两组 OPD 就诊率相似,与周期无关。与报销前组相比,报销后组按计划完成化疗的患者比例更高(93.5% vs. 90.1%;p=0.006)。报销后组在第 1 周期报告的不良事件更多,包括脱发、疲劳、腹泻、厌食和周围神经病变,这些不良事件在第 2 周期后显著减少。
引入医疗报销 AE 评估可能有助于医生发现和适当管理 AE,从而降低医院利用率并提高化疗完成率。