Suppr超能文献

无论在何种医疗环境下,射血分数保留、中间范围和降低的心衰:一项观察性研究。

Heart failure with preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction across health care settings: an observational study.

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.

Dutch Heart Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;9(1):363-372. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13742. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

Abstract

AIMS

This study aimed to assess the sex-specific distribution of heart failure (HF) with preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fraction across three health care settings.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this descriptive observational study, we retrieved the distribution of HF types [with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)] for men and women between 65 and 79 years of age in three health care settings from a single country: (i) patients with screening-detected HF in the high-risk community (i.e. those with shortness of breath, frailty, diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) from four screening studies, (ii) patients with confirmed HF from primary care derived from a single observational study, and (iii) patients with confirmed HF from outpatient cardiology clinics participating in a registry. Among 1407 patients from the high-risk community, 288 had screen-detected HF (15% HFrEF, 12% HFmrEF, 74% HFpEF), and 51% of the screen-detected HF patients were women. In both women (82%) and men (65%), HFpEF was the most prevalent HF type. In the routine general practice population (30 practices, 70 000 individuals), among the 160 confirmed HF cases, 35% had HFrEF, 23% HFmrEF, and 43% HFpEF, and in total, 43% were women. In women, HFpEF was the most prevalent HF type (52%), while in men, this was HFrEF (41%). In outpatient cardiology clinics (n = 34), of the 4742 HF patients (66% HFrEF, 15% HFmrEF, 20% HFpEF), 36% were women. In both women (56%) and men (71%), HFrEF was the most prevalent HF type.

CONCLUSIONS

Both HF types and sex distribution vary considerably in HF patients of 65-79 years of age among health care settings. From the high-risk community through to general practice to the cardiology outpatient setting, there is a shift in HF type from HFpEF to HFrEF and a decrease in the proportion of HF patients that are women.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在三个医疗保健环境中,心力衰竭(HF)伴射血分数降低、中值和保留的性别特异性分布。

方法和结果

在这项描述性观察研究中,我们从一个国家的三个医疗保健环境中检索了 65 至 79 岁男性和女性的心力衰竭类型分布[射血分数降低(HFrEF)、中值射血分数(HFmrEF)和保留射血分数(HFpEF)]:(i)来自四项筛查研究的高危社区中筛查发现的 HF 患者(即呼吸困难、虚弱、糖尿病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者);(ii)来自一项观察性研究的初级保健中确诊的 HF 患者;(iii)参与注册的门诊心脏病学诊所中确诊的 HF 患者。在高危社区的 1407 名患者中,有 288 名患有筛查发现的 HF(15% HFrEF、12% HFmrEF、74% HFpEF),其中 51%的筛查发现 HF 患者为女性。在女性(82%)和男性(65%)中,HFpEF 是最常见的 HF 类型。在常规全科医疗人群(30 家实践,70000 人)中,在 160 例确诊的 HF 病例中,35%为 HFrEF,23%为 HFmrEF,43%为 HFpEF,总共 43%为女性。在女性中,HFpEF 是最常见的 HF 类型(52%),而在男性中,这是 HFrEF(41%)。在门诊心脏病学诊所(n=34)中,4742 例 HF 患者(66% HFrEF、15% HFmrEF、20% HFpEF)中,36%为女性。在女性(56%)和男性(71%)中,HFrEF 是最常见的 HF 类型。

结论

在不同医疗保健环境中,65-79 岁 HF 患者的 HF 类型和性别分布差异很大。从高危社区到全科医疗再到心脏病学门诊环境,HF 类型从 HFpEF 转变为 HFrEF,HF 患者中女性的比例下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/8787985/bdd870ae1c66/EHF2-9-363-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验