University of Cyprus Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus.
National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;25(6):818-828. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2833. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
Evidence on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) for hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced (HFrEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF) and preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction is limited.
We analysed HCRU in relation to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) phenotypes, clinical features and in-hospital and 12-month outcomes in 16 943 patients hospitalized for HF in a worldwide registry. HFrEF was more prevalent (53%) than HFmrEF (17%) or HFpEF (30%). Patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF were older, more often women, with milder symptoms and more comorbidities, but differences were not pronounced. HCRU was high in all three groups; two or more in- and out-of-hospital services were required by 51%, 49% and 52% of patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively, and intensive care unit by 41%, 41% and 37%, respectively. Hospitalization length was similar (median, 8 days). Discharge prescription of neurohormonal inhibitors was <80% for each agent in HFrEF and only slightly lower in HFmrEF and HFpEF (74% and 67%, respectively, for beta-blockers). Compared to HFrEF, 12-month all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were lower for HFmrEF (adjusted hazard ratios 0.78 [95% confidence interval 0.59-0.71] and 0.80 [0.70-0.92]) and HFpEF (0.64 [0.59-0.87] and 0.63 [0.56-0.71]); 12-month HF hospitalization was also lower for HFpEF and HFmrEF (21% and 20% vs. 25% for HFrEF). In-hospital mortality, 12-month non-cardiovascular mortality and 12-month all-cause hospitalization were similar among groups.
In patients hospitalized for HF, overall HCRU was similarly high across LVEF spectrum, reflecting the subtle clinical differences among LVEF phenotypes during hospitalization. Discharge prescription of neurohormonal inhibitors was suboptimal in HFrEF and lower but significant in patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF, who had better long-term cardiovascular outcomes than HFrEF, but similar risk for non-cardiovascular events.
关于射血分数降低(HFrEF)、轻度降低(HFmrEF)和保留(HFpEF)的心力衰竭(HF)住院患者的医疗资源利用(HCRU)的证据有限。
我们分析了在全球注册中心因 HF 住院的 16943 例患者中,与左心室射血分数(LVEF)表型、临床特征以及住院期间和 12 个月结局相关的 HCRU。HFrEF 的患病率(53%)高于 HFmrEF(17%)或 HFpEF(30%)。HFmrEF 和 HFpEF 患者年龄较大,女性较多,症状较轻,合并症更多,但差异不明显。所有三组的 HCRU 均较高;HFrEF、HFmrEF 和 HFpEF 患者分别有 51%、49%和 52%需要 2 种或以上的院内和院外服务,分别有 41%、41%和 37%需要入住重症监护病房。住院时间相似(中位数为 8 天)。HFrEF 中,神经激素抑制剂的出院处方每种药物均低于 80%,而 HFmrEF 和 HFpEF 中的处方率则略低(β受体阻滞剂分别为 74%和 67%)。与 HFrEF 相比,HFmrEF(校正后的危险比 0.78 [95%置信区间 0.59-0.71]和 0.80 [0.70-0.92])和 HFpEF(0.64 [0.59-0.87]和 0.63 [0.56-0.71])的 12 个月全因和心血管死亡率较低;HFpEF 和 HFmrEF 的 12 个月 HF 住院率也较低(分别为 21%和 20%,而 HFrEF 为 25%)。住院期间死亡率、12 个月非心血管死亡率和 12 个月全因住院率在各组之间相似。
在因 HF 住院的患者中,LVEF 谱中整体 HCRU 相似,反映了住院期间 LVEF 表型之间的细微临床差异。HFrEF 出院时神经激素抑制剂的处方不理想,HFpEF 和 HFmrEF 的处方率较低但有显著意义,HFpEF 和 HFmrEF 患者的长期心血管结局优于 HFrEF,但非心血管事件风险相似。