• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本住院心力衰竭患者射血分数保留、中间范围和降低的临床特征。

Clinical characteristics of hospitalized heart failure patients with preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fractions in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Yachiyo, Japan.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;6(3):475-486. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12418. Epub 2019 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1002/ehf2.12418
PMID:30829002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6487690/
Abstract

AIMS

There are regional differences in the patient characteristics, management, and outcomes of hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Japanese patients who are hospitalized with HF on the basis of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) stratum.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively conducted a multicentre cohort study of 1245 hospitalized patients with decompensated HF between 2013 and 2014. Of these patients, 36% had an LVEF < 40% [HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), median age 72 years, 71% male], 21% had an LVEF 40-49% [HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), 77 years, 56% male], and 43% had an LVEF ≥ 50% [HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), 81 years, 44% male]. The primary outcome was death from any cause, and the secondary outcomes were cardiac death and re-hospitalization due to worsened HF after hospital discharge. There were high proportions of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (32%) in HFrEF patients, coronary artery disease (44%) in HFmrEF patients, and valvular disease (39%) in HFpEF patients. The frequencies of intravenous diuretic and natriuretic peptide administration during hospitalization were 66% and 30%, respectively. The median hospital stay for the overall population was 19 days, and the length of stay was >7 days for >90% of patients. In-hospital mortality was 7%, but was not different among the LVEF groups (HFrEF 7%, HFmrEF 6%, and HFpEF 8%). After a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 3-26 months), 192 (17%) of the 1156 patients who were discharged alive died, and 534 (46%) were re-hospitalized after hospital discharge. There were no significant differences in mortality after hospital discharge among the three LVEF groups (HFrEF 18%, HFmrEF 16%, and HFpEF 16%). There were no differences in cardiac death or re-hospitalization due to worsened HF after hospital discharge among the LVEF groups (cardiac death: HFrEF 8%, HFmrEF 7%, and HFpEF 7%; re-hospitalization due to worsened HF: HFrEF 19%, HFmrEF 16%, and HFpEF 17%). Multivariable-adjusted analyses showed that the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups, compared with the HFpEF group, were not associated with an increased risk for in-hospital death or death after hospital discharge. Non-cardiac causes of death and re-hospitalization after hospital discharge accounted for 35% and 38%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed different clinical characteristics but similar mortality rates in the HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF groups. The most common cause of death and re-hospitalization after hospital discharge was HF, but non-cardiac causes also contributed to their prognosis. Integrated management approaches will be required for HF patients.

摘要

目的

心力衰竭(HF)住院患者的患者特征、治疗和结局存在地域差异。本研究旨在根据左心室射血分数(LVEF)分层评估日本 HF 住院患者的临床特征和结局。

方法和结果

我们回顾性地对 2013 年至 2014 年期间 1245 例失代偿性 HF 住院患者进行了一项多中心队列研究。这些患者中,36%的 LVEF<40%[射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF),中位年龄 72 岁,71%为男性],21%的 LVEF 为 40-49%[HF 射血分数中间范围(HFmrEF),77 岁,56%为男性],43%的 LVEF≥50%[HF 射血分数保留(HFpEF),81 岁,44%为男性]。主要结局是任何原因导致的死亡,次要结局是心脏死亡和出院后因 HF 恶化而再住院。HFrEF 患者中非缺血性心肌病(32%)、HFmrEF 患者中冠状动脉疾病(44%)和 HFpEF 患者中瓣膜疾病(39%)的比例较高。住院期间静脉利尿剂和利钠肽的使用频率分别为 66%和 30%。总体人群的中位住院时间为 19 天,>90%的患者住院时间>7 天。院内死亡率为 7%,但在 LVEF 组之间无差异(HFrEF 7%,HFmrEF 6%,HFpEF 8%)。中位随访 19 个月(范围,3-26 个月)后,1156 例出院存活患者中有 192 例(17%)死亡,534 例(46%)出院后再住院。出院后死亡率在 LVEF 三组之间无显著差异(HFrEF 18%,HFmrEF 16%,HFpEF 16%)。出院后心脏死亡或因 HF 恶化再住院在 LVEF 组之间无差异(心脏死亡:HFrEF 8%,HFmrEF 7%,HFpEF 7%;因 HF 恶化再住院:HFrEF 19%,HFmrEF 16%,HFpEF 17%)。多变量调整分析显示,HFmrEF 和 HFrEF 组与 HFpEF 组相比,院内死亡或出院后死亡的风险无增加。非心脏原因死亡和出院后再住院分别占 35%和 38%。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,HFrEF、HFmrEF 和 HFpEF 三组患者的临床特征不同,但死亡率相似。HF 是导致死亡和出院后再住院的最常见原因,但非心脏原因也会影响预后。需要对 HF 患者采取综合管理方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8908/6487690/b764b0a2325d/EHF2-6-475-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8908/6487690/4e8f81eca6ed/EHF2-6-475-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8908/6487690/b764b0a2325d/EHF2-6-475-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8908/6487690/4e8f81eca6ed/EHF2-6-475-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8908/6487690/b764b0a2325d/EHF2-6-475-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical characteristics of hospitalized heart failure patients with preserved, mid-range, and reduced ejection fractions in Japan.日本住院心力衰竭患者射血分数保留、中间范围和降低的临床特征。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;6(3):475-486. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12418. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
2
Acute heart failure with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction: clinical profile, in-hospital management, and short-term outcome.左心室射血分数中等范围的急性心力衰竭:临床特征、住院治疗及短期预后
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 May;106(5):359-368. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1063-0. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
3
Clinical characteristics, one-year change in ejection fraction and long-term outcomes in patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: a multicentre prospective observational study in Catalonia (Spain).伴有中间范围射血分数的心力衰竭患者的临床特征、射血分数一年变化及长期结局:在加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)进行的一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e018719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018719.
4
[Contemporary epidemiology and treatment of hospitalized heart failure patients in real clinical practice in China].[中国实际临床实践中住院心力衰竭患者的当代流行病学与治疗]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Nov 24;47(11):865-874. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.11.004.
5
Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction phenotypes on healthcare resource utilization in hospitalized heart failure: a secondary analysis of REPORT-HF.左心室射血分数表型对住院心力衰竭患者医疗资源利用的影响:REPORT-HF 的二次分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;25(6):818-828. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2833. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
6
A comprehensive population-based characterization of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction.具有中等范围射血分数的心力衰竭的综合人群特征描述。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Dec;19(12):1624-1634. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.945. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
7
Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure With Preserved, Mid-Range, and Reduced Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留、中间范围和降低的心衰伴发的心房颤动。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Aug;5(8):565-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
8
Mortality associated with heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in a prospective international multi-ethnic cohort study.在一项前瞻性国际多民族队列研究中,射血分数保留型与射血分数降低型心力衰竭相关的死亡率。
Eur Heart J. 2018 May 21;39(20):1770-1780. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy005.
9
Effect of digoxin in patients with heart failure and mid-range (borderline) left ventricular ejection fraction.地高辛对心力衰竭伴左心室射血分数中间值(边缘值)患者的影响。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Jul;20(7):1139-1145. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1160. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
10
Mode of Death Among Japanese Adults With Heart Failure With Preserved, Midrange, and Reduced Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留、中间范围和降低的心衰日本成年人的死亡模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e204296. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4296.

引用本文的文献

1
In-hospital Utilization and Dose Optimization of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies among Acute Heart Failure Yemeni Patients.也门急性心力衰竭患者指南指导下药物治疗的院内使用情况及剂量优化
Heart Views. 2025 Jan-Mar;26(1):7-18. doi: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_152_24. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
2
Risk factors for prolonged hospitalization in acute decompensated heart failure from the HEROES study.来自HEROES研究的急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者延长住院时间的危险因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 9;15(1):29133. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14100-1.
3
Assessing volume status in heart failure: The role of renal duplex ultrasound in evaluating cardiorenal morbidity and heart failure mortality.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparable prognostic impact of BNP levels among HFpEF, Borderline HFpEF and HFrEF: a report from the CHART-2 Study.BNP水平在射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)、边缘性HFpEF和射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)中的预后影响比较:CHART-2研究报告
Heart Vessels. 2018 Sep;33(9):997-1007. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1150-4. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
2
Vasodilators in acute heart failure - evidence based on new studies.急性心力衰竭中的血管扩张剂 - 基于新研究的证据。
Eur J Intern Med. 2018 May;51:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
Long-Term Prognostic Significance of Plasma B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Level in Patients With Acute Heart Failure With Reduced, Mid-Range, and Preserved Ejection Fractions.
评估心力衰竭中的容量状态:肾脏双功超声在评估心肾疾病和心力衰竭死亡率中的作用。
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2025 Jul 31;11(3):275-289. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2025-0029. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Association of Different Types of Diabetic Autonomic Neuropathy With Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.2型糖尿病患者不同类型糖尿病自主神经病变与左心室舒张功能障碍的相关性:一项横断面研究
J Diabetes. 2025 Jul;17(7):e70124. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.70124.
5
The landscape of novel antidiabetic drugs in diabetic HFpEF: relevant mechanisms and clinical implications.糖尿病性射血分数保留的心力衰竭中新型抗糖尿病药物的概况:相关机制及临床意义
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Apr 28;24(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02750-4.
6
Device-based therapies for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭的器械治疗
Heart Fail Rev. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1007/s10741-025-10510-5.
7
Hepatocyte growth factor and B-type natriuretic peptide as independent predictors of mortality in HFpEF patients.肝细胞生长因子和B型利钠肽作为射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者死亡率的独立预测因子。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 18;12:1512411. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1512411. eCollection 2025.
8
Clinical outcomes during and after wearable cardioverter defibrillator use in Japanese patients with heart failure: A single-center experience.日本心力衰竭患者使用可穿戴式心脏复律除颤器期间及之后的临床结果:单中心经验
J Arrhythm. 2024 Oct 4;40(6):1462-1472. doi: 10.1002/joa3.13158. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Investigation of left ventricular ejection fraction in a Swiss heart failure population: Insights into mortality and sex differences.瑞士心力衰竭人群左心室射血分数的调查:对死亡率和性别差异的见解。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;12(3):1630-1639. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15174. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
10
J-shaped association between serum glucose potassium ratio and prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with stronger predictive value in non-diabetic patients.射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者中,血清葡萄糖钾比值与预后呈J形关联,在非糖尿病患者中具有更强的预测价值。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 2;14(1):29965. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81289-y.
射血分数降低、中等范围及保留的急性心力衰竭患者血浆B型利钠肽水平的长期预后意义
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 15;121(6):731-738. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.12.012. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
4
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as prognostic indicators: Comparisons among heart failure patients with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction.心肺运动试验作为预后指标:射血分数降低、中间范围和保留的心衰患者的比较。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Dec;24(18):1979-1987. doi: 10.1177/2047487317739079. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
5
Heart Failure With Mid-Range (Borderline) Ejection Fraction: Clinical Implications and Future Directions.心力衰竭伴中间范围(边缘)射血分数:临床意义与未来方向。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;5(11):763-771. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
6
The impact of carperitide usage on the cost of hospitalization and outcome in patients with acute heart failure: High value care vs. low value care campaign in Japan.卡培立肽的使用对急性心力衰竭患者住院费用及预后的影响:日本的高价值医疗与低价值医疗运动
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;241:243-248. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.078. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
7
Characterization of heart failure patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction-a report from the CHART-2 Study.心力衰竭伴有中间范围左心室射血分数患者的特征 - CHART-2 研究报告。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Oct;19(10):1258-1269. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.807. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
8
Precipitating Clinical Factors, Heart Failure Characterization, and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure With Reduced, Borderline, and Preserved Ejection Fraction.导致心力衰竭住院的临床因素、心力衰竭特征及结局分析:射血分数降低、边界值和保留的心衰患者。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Jun;4(6):464-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.02.017.
9
2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.2016欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗工作组编写,欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会(HFA)提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. Epub 2016 May 20.
10
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC).2015年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)室性心律失常患者管理和心脏性猝死预防指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)室性心律失常患者管理和心脏性猝死预防特别工作组。认可机构:欧洲儿科和先天性心脏病协会(AEPC)。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 1;36(41):2793-2867. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv316. Epub 2015 Aug 29.