• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎体间融合术后 cage 沉降的发生率及危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。

Prevalence and risk factors for cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.

Department of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 10;100(49):e28085. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028085.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000028085
PMID:34889258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8663804/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is an effective treatment for lumbar degenerative diseases. Cage subsidence (CS) contitutes one of the most common postoperative complications. Many risk factors for CS after LIF have been reported in some studies. However, controversies still exist. The objective of this study will be to summarize data on the prevalence and risk factors of CS after LIF.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Our study present a protocol that conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors for CS after LIF. Two reviewers retrieved the relevant articles using the 5 databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) from inception to May 31st, 2021. Primary outcome will be the prevalence of CS after LIF. Second outcomes include the risk factors associated with postoperative CS and clinical outcomes associated with postoperative CS. Three reviewers will screen citation titles and abstracts and evaluated full-text of each potentially relevant citation, and then extracted the data using a data extraction form. Any discrepancies in decisions between reviewers will be resolved through discussion. We assessed the methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). The aim of the extra analysis is to explore the explanations of the heterogeneity (age, gender, race, year of publication, type of study and surgical procedure). Publication bias will be assessed by Begg test, Egger test and funnel plots.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No primary data will be collected and individual patient information and endangering participant rights, thus ethics approval is not required. Findings will be reported through publication and media.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42021257981 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#joinuppage).

摘要

介绍

腰椎体间融合术(LIF)是治疗腰椎退行性疾病的有效方法。 cage 沉降(CS)是最常见的术后并发症之一。一些研究报道了 LIF 后 CS 的许多危险因素。然而,仍存在争议。本研究的目的是总结 LIF 后 CS 的发生率和危险因素的数据。

方法和分析

我们的研究方案对 LIF 后 CS 的发生率和危险因素进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。两名审查员使用 5 个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science)从成立到 2021 年 5 月 31 日检索相关文章。主要结局将是 LIF 后 CS 的发生率。次要结局包括与术后 CS 相关的危险因素和与术后 CS 相关的临床结局。三名审查员将筛选引用标题和摘要,并评估每篇潜在相关引用的全文,然后使用数据提取表提取数据。如果审查员之间存在分歧,则通过讨论解决。我们根据 Newcastle-Ottawa 质量评估量表(NOS)评估纳入研究的方法学质量和偏倚风险。额外分析的目的是探索(年龄、性别、种族、发表年份、研究类型和手术程序)异质性的解释。通过 Begg 检验、Egger 检验和漏斗图评估发表偏倚。

伦理和传播

不会收集原始数据,也不会涉及个体患者信息和危害参与者权利,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过发表和媒体报告。

方案注册号

PROSPERO CRD42021257981(https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#joinuppage)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e24a/8663804/9cddb0bd21d9/medi-100-e28085-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e24a/8663804/9cddb0bd21d9/medi-100-e28085-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e24a/8663804/9cddb0bd21d9/medi-100-e28085-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence and risk factors for cage subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.腰椎体间融合术后 cage 沉降的发生率及危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 10;100(49):e28085. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028085.
2
Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of early postoperative hyperglycemia in surgical patients: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术患者术后早期高血糖的发生率、风险因素和结局:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 13;9(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01416-4.
3
Prevalence of neck pain and its associated factors in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.非洲颈痛的患病率及其相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 18;13(9):e074219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074219.
4
Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜下腰椎椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e352-e368. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.109. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
5
Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.腰椎终板的几何和材料特性对腰椎椎间融合失败的影响:系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 10;17(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03091-8.
6
Poor Bone Quality, Multilevel Surgery, and Narrow and Tall Cages Are Associated with Intraoperative Endplate Injuries and Late-onset Cage Subsidence in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review.骨质量差、多节段手术、以及狭窄且高的 cage 与侧路腰椎间融合术中终板损伤和迟发性 cage 下沉有关:一项系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jan 1;480(1):163-188. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001915.
7
Comparison of one versus two cages in lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal disease: a meta-analysis.用于退行性腰椎疾病的腰椎椎间融合术中单节段与双节段椎间融合器的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2014 Aug;6(3):236-43. doi: 10.1111/os.12119.
8
Rates and risk factors for suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and suicide deaths in persons with HIV: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.艾滋病毒感染者自杀意念、自杀未遂和自杀死亡的发生率及风险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e037154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037154.
9
Risk of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide deaths in persons with sleep apnea: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.患有睡眠呼吸暂停症的个体出现自杀意念、自杀企图和自杀死亡的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235379. eCollection 2020.
10
[Short-term effectiveness of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 intervertebral cage for lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lower lumbar degenerative diseases].纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺-66椎间融合器在下腰椎退行性疾病患者腰椎椎间融合中的短期疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Dec;26(12):1425-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Finite element biomechanical analysis of 3D printed intervertebral fusion cage in osteoporotic population.骨质疏松人群 3D 打印椎间融合 cage 的有限元生物力学分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 12;25(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07221-7.
2
Biomechanical evaluation of different sizes of 3D printed cage in lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element analysis.3D 打印椎间融合器不同尺寸的生物力学评价-有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Feb 1;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06201-7.
3
Complications in Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review of Clinically Used Cages.
脊柱融合手术的并发症:对临床使用椎间融合器的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 25;11(21):6279. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216279.