文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

腰椎终板的几何和材料特性对腰椎椎间融合失败的影响:系统评价。

Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.

Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 10;17(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03091-8.


DOI:10.1186/s13018-022-03091-8
PMID:35399075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8996478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is an established surgical intervention for patients with leg and back pain secondary to disc herniation or degeneration. Interbody fusion involves removal of the herniated or degenerated disc and insertion of interbody devices with bone grafts into the remaining cavity. Extensive research has been conducted on operative complications such as a failure of fusion or non-union of the vertebral bodies. Multiple factors including surgical, implant, and patient factors influencing the rate of complications have been identified. Patient factors include age, sex, osteoporosis, and patient anatomy. Complications can also be influenced by the interbody cage design. The geometry of the bony endplates as well as their corresponding material properties guides the design of interbody cages, which vary considerably across patients with spinal disorders. However, studies on the effects of such variations on the rate of complications are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to perform a systematic review of lumbar endplate geometry and material property factors in LIF failure. METHODS: Search keywords included 'factor/cause for spinal fusion failure/cage subsidence/cage migration/non-union', 'lumbar', and 'interbody' in electronic databases PubMed and Scopus with no limits on year of publication. RESULTS: In total, 1341 articles were reviewed, and 29 articles were deemed suitable for inclusion. Adverse events after LIF, such as cage subsidence, cage migration, and non-union, resulted in fusion failure; hence, risk factors for adverse events after LIF, notably those associated with lumbar endplate geometry and material properties, were also associated with fusion failure. Those risk factors were associated with shape, concavity, bone mineral density and stiffness of endplate, segmental disc angle, and intervertebral disc height. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrated that decreased contact areas between the cage and endplate, thin and weak bony endplate as well as spinal diseases such as spondylolisthesis and osteoporosis are important causes of adverse events after LIF. These findings will facilitate the selection and design of LIF cages, including customised implants based on patient endplate properties.

摘要

背景:腰椎体间融合术(LIF)是一种成熟的手术干预方法,适用于因椎间盘突出或退变导致下肢和背部疼痛的患者。该手术涉及切除突出或退变的椎间盘,并将椎间植入物和骨移植物插入剩余的空腔中。已经对手术并发症(如融合失败或椎体不愈合)进行了广泛的研究。已经确定了影响并发症发生率的多种因素,包括手术、植入物和患者因素。患者因素包括年龄、性别、骨质疏松症和患者解剖结构。椎间笼设计也会影响并发症。骨性终板的几何形状及其相应的材料特性指导着椎间笼的设计,而脊柱疾病患者的椎间笼设计差异很大。然而,关于这些变化对并发症发生率的影响的研究有限。因此,本研究旨在对 LIF 失败中腰椎终板几何形状和材料特性因素进行系统回顾。

方法:在电子数据库 PubMed 和 Scopus 中使用“factor/cause for spinal fusion failure/cage subsidence/cage migration/non-union”、“lumbar”和“interbody”作为搜索关键词,没有对发表年份进行限制。

结果:共回顾了 1341 篇文章,其中 29 篇文章被认为适合纳入。LIF 后的不良事件,如笼沉降、笼迁移和不愈合,导致融合失败;因此,LIF 后不良事件的危险因素,特别是与腰椎终板几何形状和材料特性相关的危险因素,也与融合失败相关。这些危险因素与终板的形状、凹陷、骨密度和刚度、节段性椎间盘角度以及椎间盘高度有关。

结论:本综述表明,笼与终板之间的接触面积减小、终板薄而脆弱以及脊柱疾病(如脊椎滑脱和骨质疏松症)是 LIF 后不良事件的重要原因。这些发现将有助于 LIF 笼的选择和设计,包括基于患者终板特性的定制植入物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/193e4aab39d4/13018_2022_3091_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/6192dc16ffcb/13018_2022_3091_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/aa48dcb58f93/13018_2022_3091_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/0da8e100704e/13018_2022_3091_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/a77c249451ed/13018_2022_3091_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/76c67f8b14fb/13018_2022_3091_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/485ee019a540/13018_2022_3091_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/193e4aab39d4/13018_2022_3091_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/6192dc16ffcb/13018_2022_3091_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/aa48dcb58f93/13018_2022_3091_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/0da8e100704e/13018_2022_3091_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/a77c249451ed/13018_2022_3091_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/76c67f8b14fb/13018_2022_3091_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/485ee019a540/13018_2022_3091_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af74/8996478/193e4aab39d4/13018_2022_3091_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2022-4-10

[2]
Maximizing screw length in expandable lateral lumbar interbody spacers with integrated fixation may obviate the need for supplemental pedicle screws.

Spine J. 2025-7

[3]
Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Spine J. 2021-6

[4]
Usefulness of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022-3-29

[5]
Effect of interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion on lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Spine J. 2022-5

[6]
Evaluation of the Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Conventional Fusion Operations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

World Neurosurg. 2022-4

[7]
Single position lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Spine J. 2022-3

[8]
Single or double-level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004-10-18

[9]
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[10]
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
Advancements in biomaterials and bioactive solutions for lumbar spine fusion cages: Current trends and future perspectives.

Bioact Mater. 2025-7-31

[2]
Risk Factors for Poor Matching of Intervertebral Fusion Devices After Posterior Vertebral Column Resection in Patients With Kyphosis or Kyphoscoliosis.

Orthop Surg. 2025-9

[3]
Prolonged irrigation time in endoscopic aqueous medium impairs MSC/β-TCP adhesion and osteogenic potential.

Sci Rep. 2025-6-6

[4]
Loosening of stand-alone ALIF versus TLIF in degenerated lumbar human spines: an in vitro biomechanical study.

Eur Spine J. 2025-4-29

[5]
Impact of Cage Placement on Vertebral Endplate Cyst Formation and Bone Union in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Global Spine J. 2025-4-28

[6]
Augmenting Screw Technique to Prevent TLIF Cage Subsidence: A Biomechanical In Vitro Study.

Bioengineering (Basel). 2025-3-24

[7]
Higher incidence of delayed bone fusion for atlantoaxial fusion versus occipitocervical fusion with navigation system.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025-4-3

[8]
The predictive value of endplate morphology and pedicle screw bone quality score on screw loosening after single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024-12-31

[9]
Tomographic Assessment of Fusion Rate, Implant-Endplate Contact Area, Subsidence, and Alignment With Lumbar Personalized Interbody Implants at 1-Year Follow-Up.

Int J Spine Surg. 2024-8-30

[10]
Changes in Alignment at Untreated Vertebral Levels Following Short-Segment Fusion Using Personalized Interbody Cages: Leveraging Personalized Medicine to Reduce the Risk of Reoperation.

Int J Spine Surg. 2024-8-30

本文引用的文献

[1]
Does Cage Position Affect the Risk of Cage Subsidence After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Analysis.

World Neurosurg. 2022-5

[2]
Risk factors for cage subsidence and clinical outcomes after transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022-10

[3]
[Advances in research on Cage subsidence following lumbar interbody fusion].

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021-8-15

[4]
Incidence and risk factors of lateral cage migration occurred after the first-stage lateral lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021-11

[5]
Risk factors for polyetheretherketone cage subsidence following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021-9

[6]
Endplate volumetric bone mineral density is a predictor for cage subsidence following lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a risk factor analysis.

Spine J. 2021-10

[7]
Endplate injury as a risk factor for cage retropulsion following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: An analysis of 1052 cases.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021-2-5

[8]
PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.

Neurosurg Focus. 2020-9

[9]
Lumbar disc height and vertebral Hounsfield units: association with interbody cage subsidence.

Neurosurg Focus. 2020-8

[10]
The association between lower Hounsfield units on computed tomography and cage subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Neurosurg Focus. 2020-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索