• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低风险但高风险。

Lower risk but high risk.

机构信息

Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2021 Dec 10;2021(1):428-434. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2021000277.

DOI:10.1182/hematology.2021000277
PMID:34889376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8791100/
Abstract

Risk stratification is crucial to the appropriate management of most cancers, but in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), for whom expected survival can vary from a few months to more than a decade, accurate disease prognostication is especially important. Currently, patients with MDS are often grouped into higher-risk (HR) vs lower-risk (LR) disease using clinical prognostic scoring systems, but these systems have limitations. Factors such as molecular genetic information or disease characteristics not captured in the International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised (IPSS-R) can alter risk stratification and identify a subset of patients with LR-MDS who actually behave more like those with HR-MDS. This review describes the current identification and management of patients with LR-MDS whose condition is likely to behave in a less favorable manner than predicted by the IPSS-R.

摘要

风险分层对于大多数癌症的适当管理至关重要,但对于骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者,由于其预期生存时间可能从数月到十年以上不等,因此准确预测疾病预后尤为重要。目前,MDS 患者通常使用临床预后评分系统分为高危(HR)和低危(LR)疾病,但这些系统存在局限性。一些因素,如国际预后评分系统修订版(IPSS-R)中未捕获的分子遗传学信息或疾病特征,可能会改变风险分层,并确定一部分 LR-MDS 患者的行为实际上更类似于 HR-MDS 患者。本文综述了目前对 LR-MDS 患者的识别和管理,这些患者的病情表现可能不如 IPSS-R 预测的那样有利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c102/8791100/d783522a6aec/hem.2021000277_s1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c102/8791100/d783522a6aec/hem.2021000277_s1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c102/8791100/d783522a6aec/hem.2021000277_s1.jpg

相似文献

1
Lower risk but high risk.低风险但高风险。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2021 Dec 10;2021(1):428-434. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2021000277.
2
How low risk are low risk myelodysplastic syndromes?低危骨髓增生异常综合征的风险有多低?
Expert Rev Hematol. 2022 Jan;15(1):15-24. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2022.2029698. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
3
The trajectory of prognostication and risk stratification for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.骨髓增生异常综合征患者的预后和风险分层轨迹。
Blood. 2023 Dec 28;142(26):2258-2267. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023020081.
4
Validation of the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a report from the prospective European LeukaemiaNet MDS (EUMDS) registry.修订后的国际预后评分系统(IPSS-R)在低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者中的验证:来自欧洲白血病网骨髓增生异常综合征(EUMDS)前瞻性注册研究的报告
Br J Haematol. 2015 Aug;170(3):372-83. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13450. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
5
Prognostication in myelodysplastic syndromes (neoplasms): Molecular risk stratification finally coming of age.骨髓增生异常综合征(肿瘤)的预后:分子危险分层终于成熟。
Blood Rev. 2023 May;59:101033. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2022.101033. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
6
Improved risk stratification by the integration of the revised international prognostic scoring system with the myelodysplastic syndromes comorbidity index.改良的国际预后评分系统与骨髓增生异常综合征合并症指数的整合提高了风险分层。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Dec;50(18):3198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
Enumerating bone marrow blasts from nonerythroid cellularity improves outcome prediction in myelodysplastic syndromes and permits a better definition of the intermediate risk category of the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R).从非红细胞系中列举骨髓原始细胞可改善骨髓增生异常综合征的预后预测,并可更好地定义修订后的国际预后评分系统(IPSS-R)的中间风险类别。
Am J Hematol. 2017 Jul;92(7):614-621. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24732. Epub 2017 May 9.
8
Comparing the prognostic value of risk stratifying models for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: Is one model better?比较低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者风险分层模型的预后价值:是否有一种模型更好?
Am J Hematol. 2015 Nov;90(11):1036-40. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24173.
9
Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognostic utility of risk stratification tools in patients with therapy-related vs de novo myelodysplastic syndromes: a report on behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium.治疗相关性与初发性骨髓增生异常综合征患者风险分层工具的临床结局和预后预测价值比较:代表 MDS 临床研究联盟的报告。
Leukemia. 2017 Jun;31(6):1391-1397. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.33. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
10
Dichotomization of the new revised international prognostic scoring system for a better clinical stratification of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.新修订的国际预后评分系统的二分法可更好地对骨髓增生异常综合征患者进行临床分层。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Jun;60(6):1522-1527. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1542151. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining the mutational profile of lower-risk myelodysplastic neoplasm patients with respect to disease progression using next-generation sequencing and pyrosequencing.使用二代测序和焦磷酸测序技术,针对疾病进展情况定义低风险骨髓增生异常肿瘤患者的突变谱。
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2023;27(4):269-279. doi: 10.5114/wo.2023.135365. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
2
Are We Ready For "Triplet" Therapy in Higher-Risk MDS?我们是否准备好对高危骨髓增生异常综合征进行“三联”治疗?
Clin Hematol Int. 2023 Nov 3;5(4):88301. doi: 10.46989/001c.88301. eCollection 2023.
3
Management of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

本文引用的文献

1
Genome Sequencing as an Alternative to Cytogenetic Analysis in Myeloid Cancers.基因组测序作为骨髓细胞癌细胞遗传学分析的替代方法。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 11;384(10):924-935. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024534.
2
Classification and Personalized Prognostic Assessment on the Basis of Clinical and Genomic Features in Myelodysplastic Syndromes.基于骨髓增生异常综合征临床和基因组特征的分类及个性化预后评估
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 10;39(11):1223-1233. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01659. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Germline variants drive myelodysplastic syndrome in young adults.
低危骨髓增生异常综合征患者的治疗管理。
Blood Cancer J. 2022 Dec 14;12(12):166. doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00765-8.
4
Risk stratifying MDS in the time of precision medicine.精准医学时代的 MDS 风险分层。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2022 Dec 9;2022(1):375-381. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2022000349.
生殖系变异导致年轻成年人患骨髓增生异常综合征。
Leukemia. 2021 Aug;35(8):2439-2444. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01137-0. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
4
Imetelstat Achieves Meaningful and Durable Transfusion Independence in High Transfusion-Burden Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in a Phase II Study.在一项 II 期研究中,imetelstat 可使低危骨髓增生异常综合征高输血负担患者实现有意义且持久的输血独立性。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;39(1):48-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01895. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
5
Cancer therapy shapes the fitness landscape of clonal hematopoiesis.癌症治疗改变了克隆性造血的适应性景观。
Nat Genet. 2020 Nov;52(11):1219-1226. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00710-0. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
6
Implications of TP53 allelic state for genome stability, clinical presentation and outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes.TP53 等位基因状态对骨髓增生异常综合征的基因组稳定性、临床表现和预后的影响。
Nat Med. 2020 Oct;26(10):1549-1556. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1008-z. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
7
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome.异体造血干细胞移植治疗低危骨髓增生异常综合征。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Nov;26(11):2047-2052. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
8
Impact of somatic mutations on response to lenalidomide in lower-risk non-del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes patients.体细胞突变对低危非5q缺失型骨髓增生异常综合征患者来那度胺治疗反应的影响。
Leukemia. 2021 Mar;35(3):897-900. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0961-3. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
9
Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes deserve specific diagnostic sub-classification and risk-stratification-an approach to classification of patients with t-MDS.治疗相关性骨髓增生异常综合征需要进行特定的诊断亚分类和风险分层——一种用于 t-MDS 患者分类的方法。
Leukemia. 2021 Mar;35(3):835-849. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0917-7. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
10
SF3B1-mutant MDS as a distinct disease subtype: a proposal from the International Working Group for the Prognosis of MDS.SF3B1 突变性 MDS 作为一种独特的疾病亚型:来自 MDS 预后国际工作组的建议。
Blood. 2020 Jul 9;136(2):157-170. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020004850.