Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
Oncology Center of Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 10;40(8):847-854. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01548. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
To explore trial-level and patient-level associations between response (complete remission [CR] and CR + CR with incomplete hematologic [CRi] or platelet [CRp] recovery), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) trials of intensive chemotherapy.
We identified data from eight randomized, active-controlled trials of intensive chemotherapy submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of newly diagnosed AML (N = 4,482). Associations between trial-level odds ratios (ORs) for CR and CR + CRi or CRp, and hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS and OS were analyzed using weighted linear regression models. We performed patient-level responder analyses to compare OS by response using pooled data from all studies.
In trial-level analyses, association between HR for OS and OR for CR was moderate (R = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.86), as was the association with OR for CR + CRi or CRp (R = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.99). For OS versus EFS, a strong association was observed (R = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.98) when EFS definitions were harmonized across trials using raw data. In the patient-level responder analyses, patients who achieved CR had better OS compared with CRi or CRp responders (0.73; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.84) and nonresponders (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.37).
On a trial level, there is a moderate association between OS and CR rate. A strong association between EFS and OS was observed. However, CIs were wide, and results became moderate using alternative definitions for EFS. Patient-level analyses showed CR responders have better OS compared with CRi or CRp responders and nonresponders. A therapy in newly diagnosed AML with benefit in EFS or substantial benefit in CR rate would be likely to have an OS effect.
探讨强化化疗治疗初诊急性髓系白血病(AML)临床试验中,缓解(完全缓解[CR]和伴有不完全血液学[CRi]或血小板[CRp]恢复的 CR])、无事件生存(EFS)和总生存(OS)与试验水平和患者水平之间的关系。
我们从提交给美国食品和药物管理局用于治疗初诊 AML 的八项强化化疗随机、活性对照临床试验中确定了数据(N=4482)。使用加权线性回归模型分析了 CR 和 CR+CRi 或 CRp 的试验水平比值比(OR)与 EFS 和 OS 的风险比(HR)之间的关系。我们使用所有研究的汇总数据进行了患者水平的应答者分析,以比较不同应答者的 OS。
在试验水平分析中,OS 的 HR 与 CR 的 OR 之间的关联为中度(R=0.49;95%CI,0.05 至 0.86),与 CR+CRi 或 CRp 的 OR 之间的关联也是中度(R=0.48;95%CI,0.05 至 0.99)。当使用原始数据使试验间 EFS 定义一致时,观察到 OS 与 EFS 之间存在很强的关联(R=0.87;95%CI,0.47 至 0.98)。在患者水平的应答者分析中,与 CRi 或 CRp 应答者(HR,0.73;95%CI,0.64 至 0.84)和无应答者(HR,0.33;95%CI,0.31 至 0.37)相比,达到 CR 的患者具有更好的 OS。
在试验水平上,OS 与 CR 率之间存在中度关联。观察到 EFS 与 OS 之间存在很强的关联。然而,CI 较宽,并且使用 EFS 的替代定义时,结果变为中度。患者水平的分析表明,CR 应答者的 OS 优于 CRi 或 CRp 应答者和无应答者。在初诊 AML 中,具有 EFS 获益或 CR 率显著获益的治疗方法可能具有 OS 效果。