Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Medical Imaging, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Apr;7(4):318-331. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00393-9. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
Strictures are the most common structural complication of Crohn's disease. Surgery and endoscopic balloon dilation are the main treatments; drug therapy has been considered contraindicated. Given that most strictures have an inflammatory component, we aimed to find out whether strictures are responsive to drug treatment and whether intensive drug therapy is more effective than standard drug therapy.
This open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial was performed in one specialist inflammatory bowel disease centre in Australia. Patients aged 18 years or older with Crohn's disease were included. Eligible patients had a de novo or postoperative anastomotic intestinal stricture on MRI or ileocolonoscopy, symptoms consistent with chronic or subacute intestinal obstruction (postprandial abdominal pain in the presence of a confirmed stricture), and evidence of active intestinal inflammation. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive intensive high-dose adalimumab (160 mg adalimumab once per week for 4 weeks followed by 40 mg every 2 weeks, with escalation of dose at 4 months and 8 months if assessment of disease activity indicated active inflammation) plus thiopurine (initial dose of azathioprine 2·5 mg/kg or mercaptopurine 1·5 mg/kg, with dose adjustment based on thiopurine metabolite testing) or standard adalimumab monotherapy (160 mg at week 0, 80 mg at week 2, then 40 mg every 2 weeks) using stratified fixed block randomisation. Stratification factors were stricture dilation at study baseline colonoscopy and current biologic drug use. The primary endpoint was improvement (decrease) in the 14-day obstructive symptom score at 12 months by one or more points compared with baseline. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03220841, and is completed.
Between Sept 10, 2017, and Sept 6, 2019, 123 patients were screened and 77 randomly assigned to intensive adalimumab plus thiopurine treatment (n=52) or standard adalimumab treatment (n=25). At 12 months, improvement in obstructive symptom score was noted in 41 (79%) of 52 patients in the intensive treatment group and 16 (64%) of 25 in the standard treatment group (odds ratio [OR] 2·10 [95% CI 0·73-6·01]; p=0·17). Treatment failure occurred in five (10%) patients in the intensive treatment group versus seven (28%) in the standard treatment group (OR 0·27 [95% CI 0·08-0·97]; p=0·045); four patients in each group required stricture surgery (0·44 [0·10-1·92]; p=0·27). Crohn's Disease Activity Index was less than 150 in 36 (69%) patients in the intensive treatment group versus 15 (60%) in the standard treatment group (1·50 [0·56-4·05]; p=0·42). MRI at 12 months showed improvement using the stricture MaRIA score (≥25%) in 31 (61%) of 51 versus seven (28%) of 25 patients (3·99 [1·41-11·26]; p=0·0091). MRI complete stricture resolution was seen in ten (20%) versus four (16%) patients (1·28 [0·36 to 4·57]; p=0·70). Intestinal ultrasound at 12 months showed improvement (>25%) in bowel wall thickness in 22 (51%) of 43 versus seven (33%) of 21 patients (2·10 [0·71 to 6·21]; p=0·18). Faecal calprotectin normalised in 32 (62%) versus 11 (44%) patients (2·04 [0·77-5·36]; p=0·15). Normalisation of CRP was seen in 32 (62%) versus 11 (44%) patients (2·04 [0·77-5·36]; p=0·15). Eight (15%) patients in the intensive treatment group and four (16%) in the standard treatment group reported serious adverse events. No deaths occurred during the study.
Crohn's disease strictures are responsive to drug treatment. Most patients had improved symptoms and stricture morphology. Treat-to-target therapy intensification resulted in less treatment failure, a reduction in stricture-associated inflammation, and greater improvement in stricture morphology, although these differences were not significantly different from standard therapy.
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, Gastroenterological Society of Australia Ferring IBD Clinician Establishment Award, Australasian Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation, AbbVie, and the Spotlight Foundation.
狭窄是克罗恩病最常见的结构并发症。手术和内镜球囊扩张是主要治疗方法;药物治疗被认为是禁忌的。鉴于大多数狭窄都有炎症成分,我们旨在了解狭窄是否对药物治疗有反应,以及强化药物治疗是否比标准药物治疗更有效。
这是一项在澳大利亚一家专门的炎症性肠病中心进行的开放标签、单中心、随机对照试验。纳入年龄在 18 岁及以上的新诊断或术后吻合口肠狭窄的克罗恩病患者。符合条件的患者在 MRI 或回结肠镜检查时有新的或术后吻合口肠道狭窄,有慢性或亚急性肠梗阻的症状(在确认狭窄的情况下餐后腹痛),且有肠道炎症活动的证据。患者随机(2:1)接受强化高剂量阿达木单抗(160mg 阿达木单抗每周一次,持续 4 周,然后每 2 周 40mg,在评估疾病活动时,如果有活性炎症,每 4 个月和 8 个月时增加剂量)加硫嘌呤(初始剂量为硫唑嘌呤 2.5mg/kg 或巯嘌呤 1.5mg/kg,根据硫嘌呤代谢物检测调整剂量)或标准阿达木单抗单药治疗(第 0 周 160mg,第 2 周 80mg,然后每 2 周 40mg),采用分层固定块随机化。分层因素为研究基线结肠镜检查时狭窄扩张和当前生物药物使用情况。主要终点是与基线相比,12 个月时 14 天梗阻症状评分下降一个或多个点。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT03220841,已完成。
2017 年 9 月 10 日至 2019 年 9 月 6 日,筛选了 123 名患者,其中 77 名随机分配至强化阿达木单抗加硫嘌呤治疗组(n=52)或标准阿达木单抗治疗组(n=25)。在 12 个月时,强化治疗组 52 名患者中有 41 名(79%)的梗阻症状评分改善,标准治疗组 25 名患者中有 16 名(64%)(比值比[OR]2.10[95%CI 0.73-6.01];p=0.17)。强化治疗组 5 名(10%)患者治疗失败,标准治疗组 7 名(28%)(OR 0.27[95%CI 0.08-0.97];p=0.045);两组各有 4 名患者需要进行狭窄手术(0.44[0.10-1.92];p=0.27)。强化治疗组 36 名(69%)患者的克罗恩病活动指数(CDAI)小于 150,标准治疗组 15 名(60%)(1.50[0.56-4.05];p=0.42)。12 个月时的 MRI 显示,采用狭窄 MaRIA 评分(≥25%)评估,51 名患者中有 31 名(61%)改善,25 名患者中有 7 名(28%)(3.99[1.41-11.26];p=0.0091)。10 名(20%)患者 MRI 显示完全狭窄缓解,4 名(16%)患者(1.28[0.36-4.57];p=0.70)。12 个月时的肠道超声显示,43 名患者中有 22 名(51%)肠壁厚度改善(>25%),21 名患者中有 7 名(33%)(2.10[0.71-6.21];p=0.18)。32 名(62%)患者粪便钙卫蛋白正常化,11 名(44%)患者(2.04[0.77-5.36];p=0.15)。32 名(62%)患者 CRP 正常化,11 名(44%)患者(2.04[0.77-5.36];p=0.15)。强化治疗组有 8 名(15%)患者和标准治疗组有 4 名(16%)患者报告了严重不良事件。研究期间无死亡发生。
克罗恩病狭窄对药物治疗有反应。大多数患者的症状和狭窄形态均有改善。强化治疗靶向治疗导致治疗失败减少,与狭窄相关的炎症减轻,狭窄形态改善更大,尽管这些差异与标准治疗没有显著差异。
澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究委员会、澳大利亚胃肠病学会 Ferring IBD 临床医生建立奖、澳大拉西亚胃肠病学研究基金会、艾伯维和 Spotlight 基金会。