Suppr超能文献

CAR T 细胞治疗后桥接放疗是否会影响非霍奇金淋巴瘤的失败模式?

Does bridging radiation therapy affect the pattern of failure after CAR T-cell therapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma?

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, USA.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2022 Jan;166:171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.031. Epub 2021 Dec 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Analyze the pattern of disease failure after anti-CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, assess the local control rate of bridging radiotherapy (bRT) and characterize in-field recurrences.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 120 patients with NHL who received CART between 2018 and 2020. Baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between patients who received bRT and those who did not (noRT).

RESULTS

Of the 118 patients included, 14 (12%) received bRT, while 104 (88%) did not. bRT group had more localized and extranodal disease. bRT was delivered with a median dose of 20 Gy (range: 15-36) in 5 fractions (range: 3-24). Pattern of failure analysis revealed that progression involving pre-existing sites was the predominant pattern of failure in both the bRT and noRT groups (86% and 88%, respectively). Median duration of response was 128 days (range: 25-547) for bRT group and 93 days (range: 22-965) for noRT group (p = 0.78). In the bRT group, only 2/15 sites irradiated had infield recurrence and where characterized by bulky disease, SUV >20, elevated LDH at the time of CART infusion, and extranodal involvement. The bRT 1-year LC was 86%. Median duration of local response was 257 days (range: 25-630) for radiation-bridged sites.

CONCLUSION

Majority of progressions after CART infusion involve pre-existing sites. Bridging RT prior to CART provides excellent in-field local control and durable response. Patients with bulky disease, SUV >20, elevated LDH, and extranodal involvement are likely at higher risk of in-field recurrence after bRT and may benefit from higher curative doses of bRT.

摘要

目的

分析抗 CD19 定向嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法(CART)治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤后的疾病失败模式,评估桥接放疗(bRT)的局部控制率,并描述场内复发情况。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2018 年至 2020 年间接受 CART 治疗的 120 例 NHL 患者。比较了接受 bRT 和未接受 bRT(noRT)的患者的基线特征和治疗结果。

结果

在纳入的 118 例患者中,有 14 例(12%)接受了 bRT,而 104 例(88%)未接受。bRT 组的局限性和结外疾病更多。bRT 的中位剂量为 20Gy(范围:15-36),分 5 次给予(范围:3-24)。失败模式分析显示,在 bRT 和 noRT 组中,进展涉及原有部位是失败的主要模式(分别为 86%和 88%)。bRT 组的中位缓解持续时间为 128 天(范围:25-547),noRT 组为 93 天(范围:22-965)(p=0.78)。在 bRT 组中,仅有 2/15 个照射部位出现场内复发,且这些部位的特点是肿块较大、SUV>20、在 CART 输注时 LDH 升高以及结外受累。bRT 的 1 年 LC 为 86%。接受 bRT 的部位的局部反应中位持续时间为 257 天(范围:25-630)。

结论

CART 输注后大多数进展涉及原有部位。在 CART 之前进行桥接放疗可提供极好的场内局部控制和持久的反应。肿块较大、SUV>20、LDH 升高和结外受累的患者在接受 bRT 后场内复发的风险较高,可能受益于更高的 bRT 根治剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验