Ott D J, Chen Y M, Gelfand D W, Wu W C
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Oct;147(4):697-700. doi: 10.2214/ajr.147.4.697.
The efficacies of single-contrast and multiphasic examinations of the stomach for gastric ulcer detection were compared in 90 patients with 102 gastric ulcers, and in a control group of 382 patients without gastric ulcer. Single-contrast and multiphasic sensitivities were 62% and 64%, respectively. Radiographic detection depended significantly on ulcer size: Only 24% of ulcers under 5 mm were detected, compared with 89% of ulcers 5 mm or larger. Radiographic specificities and positive predictive values were similar for both types of examination. Moderate variation of the sensitivities and specificities of the three radiologists was observed, with ranges of 53-69% and 90-98%, respectively. Results indicated that gastric ulcer detection is more related to ulcer size and to individual interpretive variations than to the type of examination.
对90例患有102处胃溃疡的患者以及382例无胃溃疡的对照组患者,比较了胃单对比造影和多期检查对胃溃疡的检测效果。单对比造影和多期检查的敏感度分别为62%和64%。影像学检测明显取决于溃疡大小:5毫米以下的溃疡仅24%被检测到,而5毫米或更大的溃疡则为89%。两种检查类型的影像学特异性和阳性预测值相似。观察到三位放射科医生的敏感度和特异性有适度差异,范围分别为53 - 69%和90 - 98%。结果表明,胃溃疡检测与溃疡大小以及个体解读差异的关系比与检查类型的关系更大。