Suppr超能文献

胃溃疡的检测:单对比与双对比检查的比较

Detection of gastric ulcer: comparison of single- and double-contrast examination.

作者信息

Ott D J, Gelfand D W, Wu W C

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Jul;139(1):93-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.139.1.93.

Abstract

The radiographic sensitivities of single- and double-contrast examinations for detecting gastric ulcer were compared. Single-contrast radiography detected 30 (75%) of 40 endoscopically verified gastric ulcers. Only 56% of ulcers under 5 mm were detected with the single-contrast method, while 88% of those larger were identified. Double-contrast radiography detected 58 (62%) of 93 endoscopically verified gastric ulcers. Only 45% of ulcers under 5 mm were detected with the double-contrast method, while 78% of those larger were identified. Statistically, the probability of ulcer detection was found to be primarily dependent on ulcer size, regardless of the technique used, and no significant difference could be demonstrated between the sensitivities of single- and double-contrast radiography.

摘要

比较了单对比和双对比检查对胃溃疡的放射学敏感性。单对比造影检查在40例经内镜证实的胃溃疡中检测出30例(75%)。单对比法仅检测出5毫米以下溃疡的56%,而较大溃疡的检测率为88%。双对比造影检查在93例经内镜证实的胃溃疡中检测出58例(62%)。双对比法仅检测出5毫米以下溃疡的45%,而较大溃疡的检测率为78%。从统计学上看,发现溃疡检测概率主要取决于溃疡大小,无论使用何种技术,单对比和双对比造影的敏感性之间无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验