• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双能 X 射线吸收仪评估椎体骨折的观察者间一致性。

Inter-observer agreement of vertebral fracture assessment with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry equipment.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Department of Radiology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Dec 10;17(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-01046-w.

DOI:10.1007/s11657-021-01046-w
PMID:34893935
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the time and effort needed to perform vertebral morphometry, as well as inter-observer agreement for identification of vertebral fractures on vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) images.

METHODS

Ninety-six images were retrospectively selected, and three radiographers independently performed semi-automatic 6-point morphometry. Fractures were identified and graded using the Genant classification. Time needed to annotate each image was recorded, and reader fatigue was assessed using a modified Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ). Inter-observer agreement was assessed per-patient and per-vertebra for detecting fractures of all grades (grades 1-3) and for grade 2 and 3 fractures using the kappa statistic. Variability in measured vertebral height was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Per-patient agreement was 0.59 for grades 1-3 fracture detection, and 0.65 for grades 2-3 only. Agreement for per-vertebra fracture classification was 0.92. Vertebral height measurements had an ICC of 0.96. Time needed to annotate VFA images ranged between 91 and 540 s, with a mean annotation time of 259 s. Mean SSQ scores were significantly lower at the start of a reading session (1.29; 95% CI: 0.81-1.77) compared to the end of a session (3.25; 95% CI: 2.60-3.90; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Agreement for detection of patients with vertebral fractures was only moderate, and vertebral morphometry requires substantial time investment. This indicates that there is a potential benefit for automating VFA, both in improving inter-observer agreement and in decreasing reading time and burden on readers.

摘要

目的

研究进行椎体形态计量学所需的时间和精力,以及在椎体骨折评估(VFA)图像上识别椎体骨折的观察者间一致性。

方法

回顾性选择 96 张图像,由 3 名放射技师独立进行半自动 6 点形态计量。使用 Genant 分类法对骨折进行识别和分级。记录标注每张图像所需的时间,并使用改良的模拟器疾病问卷(SSQ)评估读者疲劳。使用kappa 统计评估每位患者和每节椎体的骨折检出情况,评估所有等级(1-3 级)和 2 级和 3 级骨折的检出情况。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估测量椎体高度的变异性。

结果

每位患者的 1-3 级骨折检出率为 0.59,2-3 级骨折检出率为 0.65。每节椎体骨折分类的一致性为 0.92。椎体高度测量的 ICC 为 0.96。标注 VFA 图像所需的时间范围为 91-540s,平均标注时间为 259s。在阅读过程开始时,SSQ 评分的平均值为 1.29(95%CI:0.81-1.77),显著低于阅读过程结束时的 3.25(95%CI:2.60-3.90;p<0.001)。

结论

检测椎体骨折患者的一致性仅为中度,椎体形态计量学需要大量的时间投入。这表明,VFA 的自动化具有潜在的益处,既可以提高观察者间的一致性,又可以减少阅读时间和读者的负担。

相似文献

1
Inter-observer agreement of vertebral fracture assessment with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry equipment.双能 X 射线吸收仪评估椎体骨折的观察者间一致性。
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Dec 10;17(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-01046-w.
2
Can a Deep-learning Model for the Automated Detection of Vertebral Fractures Approach the Performance Level of Human Subspecialists?深度学习模型自动检测椎体骨折的性能是否能达到人类专家的水平?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jul 1;479(7):1598-1612. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001685.
3
Reliability of vertebral fracture assessment using multidetector CT lateral scout views: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study.多排 CT 侧位扫描在评估椎体骨折中的可靠性:弗雷明汉骨质疏松研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Apr;22(4):1123-31. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1290-6. Epub 2010 May 21.
4
Comparing morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and radiography in defining vertebral wedge fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.比较形态计量学X线吸收法与X线摄影术在定义强直性脊柱炎患者椎体楔形骨折中的应用。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Nov;46(11):1667-71. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem135. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
5
Vertebral morphometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for osteoporotic vertebral fractures assessment (VFA).双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)评估骨质疏松性椎体骨折的椎体形态计量学(VFA)。
Radiol Med. 2012 Dec;117(8):1374-85. doi: 10.1007/s11547-012-0835-5. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
6
Intra-and inter-reader reliability of semi-automated quantitative morphometry measurements and vertebral fracture assessment using lateral scout views from computed tomography.使用 CT 侧位扫描图像进行半自动定量形态计量测量和椎体骨折评估的同读者内和读者间可靠性。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Oct;22(10):2677-88. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1530-4. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
7
Agreement between semi-automatic radiographic morphometry and Genant semi-quantitative method in the assessment of vertebral fractures.半自动影像学形态测量法与 Genant 半定量法评估椎体骨折的一致性。
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Aug;23(8):2129-34. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1819-3. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
8
Vertebral morphometry by DXA: a comparison of supine lateral and decubitus lateral densitometers.通过双能X线吸收法进行椎体形态测量:仰卧位侧位与卧位侧位骨密度仪的比较
J Clin Densitom. 2006 Jul-Sep;9(3):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 May 11.
9
Reproducibility of Vertebral Fracture Assessment Readings From Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Both a Population-based and Clinical Cohort: Cohen's and Uniform Kappa.基于人群队列和临床队列的双能X线吸收法椎体骨折评估读数的可重复性:科恩系数和一致性卡帕系数
J Clin Densitom. 2015 Apr-Jun;18(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
10
Accuracy of densitometric vertebral fracture assessment when performed by DXA technicians--a cross-sectional, multiobserver study.由双能X线骨密度仪技术人员进行的骨密度椎体骨折评估的准确性——一项横断面多观察者研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Apr;27(4):1451-1458. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3395-4. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for osteoporosis screening in US postmenopausal women: is it cost-effective?美国绝经后女性骨质疏松症筛查的椎体骨折评估(VFA):是否具有成本效益?
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Dec;31(12):2321-2335. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05588-6. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
2
Executive Summary of the 2019 ISCD Position Development Conference on Monitoring Treatment, DXA Cross-calibration and Least Significant Change, Spinal Cord Injury, Peri-prosthetic and Orthopedic Bone Health, Transgender Medicine, and Pediatrics.2019ISCD 立场发展会议执行摘要:监测治疗、双能 X 线吸收仪(DXA)交叉校准和最小有意义变化、脊髓损伤、假体周围和骨科骨健康、跨性别医学和儿科学。
J Clin Densitom. 2019 Oct-Dec;22(4):453-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
3
Diagnosis of vertebral deformities on chest CT and DXA compared to routine lateral thoracic spine X-ray.与常规的侧位胸椎 X 射线相比,胸部 CT 和 DXA 对脊柱侧凸的诊断。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Jun;29(6):1285-1293. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4412-1. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
Value and potential limitations of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) compared to conventional spine radiography: experience from a fracture liaison service (FLS) and a meta-analysis.与传统脊柱 X 射线相比,椎体骨折评估(VFA)的价值和潜在局限性:来自骨折联络服务(FLS)和荟萃分析的经验。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):2955-2965. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4137-6. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
5
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
A systematic review of diagnostic accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in postmenopausal women and elderly men.绝经后女性和老年男性椎体骨折评估(VFA)诊断准确性的系统评价。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 May;27(5):1691-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3436-z. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
7
Estimating prevalence of osteoporosis: examples from industrialized countries.估算骨质疏松症的患病率:工业化国家的实例。
Arch Osteoporos. 2014;9:182. doi: 10.1007/s11657-014-0182-3. Epub 2014 May 16.
8
Vertebral fracture assessment by new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.新型双能 X 射线吸收仪评估椎体骨折。
Bone. 2012 Apr;50(4):836-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
9
Influence of vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry on decision-making in osteoporosis: a structured vignette survey.双能 X 射线吸收法评估椎体骨折对骨质疏松症决策的影响:一项结构化病例调查。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Dec;50(12):2264-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker225. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
10
Evaluation of vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter setting.多中心双能 X 线吸收法骨密度仪评估椎体骨折。
Osteoporos Int. 2009 Jul;20(7):1199-205. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0806-9. Epub 2008 Dec 13.