• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偶然接触享乐性和健康性食物特征会影响一天后的食物偏好。

Incidental exposure to hedonic and healthy food features affects food preferences one day later.

机构信息

School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, 62 Hillhead Street, Glasgow, G12 8QB, UK.

Center for Mind/Brain Science, University of Trento, Mattarello, Italy.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Dec 11;6(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00338-6.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-021-00338-6
PMID:34894322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8665956/
Abstract

Memories acquired incidentally from exposure to food information in the environment may often become active to later affect food preferences. Because conscious use of these memories is not requested or required, these incidental learning effects constitute a form of indirect memory. In an experiment using a novel food preference paradigm (n = 617), we found that brief incidental exposure to hedonic versus healthy food features indirectly affected food preferences a day later, explaining approximately 10% of the variance in preferences for tasty versus healthy foods. It follows that brief incidental exposure to food information can affect food preferences indirectly for at least a day. When hedonic and health exposure were each compared to a no-exposure baseline, a general effect of hedonic exposure emerged across individuals, whereas health exposure only affected food preferences for high-BMI individuals. This pattern suggests that focusing attention on hedonic food features engages common affective processes across the general population, whereas focusing attention on healthy food features engages eating restraint goals associated with high BMI. Additionally, incidental exposure to food features primarily changed preferences for infrequently consumed foods, having less impact on habitually consumed foods. These findings offer insight into how hedonic information in the obesogenic food environment contributes to unhealthy eating behavior that leads to overweight and obesity. These findings further motivate the development of interventions that counteract the effects of exposure to hedonic food information and that broaden the effects of exposure to healthy food information.

摘要

偶然从环境中的食物信息中获得的记忆往往会变得活跃,进而影响食物偏好。由于不需要或不要求有意识地使用这些记忆,这些偶然的学习效果构成了间接记忆的一种形式。在一项使用新颖的食物偏好范式(n=617)的实验中,我们发现,短暂的偶然接触愉悦感和健康的食物特征会在一天后间接地影响食物偏好,解释了大约 10%的美味和健康食物偏好的差异。因此,短暂的偶然接触食物信息可以至少在一天内间接影响食物偏好。当将愉悦感和健康感的接触分别与无接触基线进行比较时,个体之间出现了愉悦感接触的一般效应,而健康接触仅影响 BMI 较高的人的食物偏好。这种模式表明,关注愉悦感的食物特征会引发一般人群中共同的情感过程,而关注健康食物特征则会引发与 BMI 较高相关的饮食控制目标。此外,食物特征的偶然接触主要改变了人们对不常食用的食物的偏好,对习惯性食用的食物的影响较小。这些发现为了解愉悦感信息在致肥胖的食物环境中如何导致不健康的饮食行为,从而导致超重和肥胖提供了深入的认识。这些发现进一步激发了开发干预措施的动力,以抵消接触愉悦感食物信息的影响,并扩大接触健康食物信息的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/fd6057cb9d6a/41235_2021_338_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/5083ed44f6ee/41235_2021_338_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/618d158fc766/41235_2021_338_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/53ea81d8837d/41235_2021_338_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/e5a509a3c5c1/41235_2021_338_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/1d1e7af1da7c/41235_2021_338_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/ab03984ecb8e/41235_2021_338_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/fd6057cb9d6a/41235_2021_338_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/5083ed44f6ee/41235_2021_338_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/618d158fc766/41235_2021_338_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/53ea81d8837d/41235_2021_338_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/e5a509a3c5c1/41235_2021_338_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/1d1e7af1da7c/41235_2021_338_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/ab03984ecb8e/41235_2021_338_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8196/8665956/fd6057cb9d6a/41235_2021_338_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Incidental exposure to hedonic and healthy food features affects food preferences one day later.偶然接触享乐性和健康性食物特征会影响一天后的食物偏好。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Dec 11;6(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00338-6.
2
Anxiety increases visual attention to hedonic foods: A preliminary eye-tracking study on the impact of the interplay between integral and incidental affect on foods.焦虑增加对享乐性食物的视觉注意力:关于整体和偶然情绪对食物影响相互作用的初步眼动研究。
Appetite. 2019 Jun 1;137:218-225. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
3
Does stress affect food preferences? - a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of examination stress on measures of food preferences and obesogenic behavior.压力会影响食物偏好吗?——一项随机对照试验,探究考试压力对食物偏好及致胖行为指标的影响。
Stress. 2018 Nov;21(6):556-563. doi: 10.1080/10253890.2018.1494149. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
Do hedonic- versus nutrition-based attitudes toward food predict food choices? a cross-sectional study of 6- to 11-year-olds.基于享乐主义与营养的食物态度能否预测食物选择?一项针对6至11岁儿童的横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Nov 25;14(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0618-4.
5
Hedonic contrast and the short-term stimulation of appetite.享乐主义对比与食欲的短期刺激。
Appetite. 2020 Dec 1;155:104849. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104849. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Taste preferences and food intake.味觉偏好与食物摄入量。
Annu Rev Nutr. 1997;17:237-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.237.
7
Comparison of the hedonic general Labeled Magnitude Scale with the hedonic 9-point scale.愉悦感通用标记度量量表与愉悦感 9 点量表的比较。
J Food Sci. 2014 Feb;79(2):S238-45. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12342. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
8
Does immersion or detachment facilitate healthy eating? Comparing the effects of sensory imagery and mindful decentering on attitudes and behavior towards healthy and unhealthy food.沉浸或抽离是否有助于健康饮食?比较感官想象和正念去中心对健康和不健康食物的态度和行为的影响。
Appetite. 2018 Nov 1;130:256-267. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
9
Profiling motives behind hedonic eating. Preliminary validation of the Palatable Eating Motives Scale.分析享乐性进食背后的动机。美味饮食动机量表的初步验证。
Appetite. 2014 Jan;72:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
10
Seeing is misbelieving: Consumers wrongly believe that unhealthy food tastes better when there is more of it.眼见不一定为实:消费者错误地认为,不健康食品数量越多,味道越好。
Appetite. 2024 Jun 1;197:107295. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107295. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Using consumption and reward simulations to increase the appeal of plant-based foods.利用消费和奖励模拟来提高植物性食品的吸引力。
Appetite. 2020 Dec 1;155:104812. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104812. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
2
Image-and-text health warning labels on alcohol and food: potential effectiveness and acceptability.图像与文字相结合的酒精和食品健康警示标签:潜在的有效性和可接受性。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;20(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8403-8.
3
An evaluation of Chile's Law of Food Labeling and Advertising on sugar-sweetened beverage purchases from 2015 to 2017: A before-and-after study.
评估智利 2015 年至 2017 年含糖饮料购买的食品标签和广告法:一项前后研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 11;17(2):e1003015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003015. eCollection 2020 Feb.
4
Stages of change in the purchase of packaged foods after phase 1 of the implementation of the new food policy in Chile 2017.2017年智利新食品政策实施第一阶段后包装食品购买的变化阶段
Nutrition. 2020 Mar;71:110593. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110593. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
5
Smart food policy for healthy food labeling: Leading with taste, not healthiness, to shift consumption and enjoyment of healthy foods.智能食品政策促进健康食品标签:以口味为导向,而非健康度,推动健康食品的消费和享用。
Prev Med. 2019 Feb;119:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.11.021. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
6
Training in cognitive strategies reduces eating and improves food choice.认知策略训练可减少进食量并改善食物选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 27;115(48):E11238-E11247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717092115. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
7
Consequence-Based Approach-Avoidance Training: A New and Improved Method for Changing Behavior.基于后果的回避训练:一种改变行为的新方法。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;29(12):1899-1910. doi: 10.1177/0956797618796478. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
8
Studying human eating behaviour in the laboratory: Theoretical considerations and practical suggestions.在实验室中研究人类进食行为:理论考虑与实际建议。
Appetite. 2018 Nov 1;130:339-343. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
9
Priming food intake with weight control cues: systematic review with a meta-analysis.用体重控制线索启动食物摄入量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jul 9;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0698-9.
10
Health warnings promote healthier dietary decision making: Effects of positive versus negative message framing and graphic versus text-based warnings.健康警示促进更健康的饮食决策:积极与消极信息框架以及图形与基于文本的警示的影响。
Appetite. 2018 Aug 1;127:280-288. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 9.