• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Direct and opportunity costs related to utilizing maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia.赞比亚农村利用母婴等候之家的直接和机会成本。
Midwifery. 2022 Feb;105:103211. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103211. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
2
Experiences with and expectations of maternity waiting homes in Luapula Province, Zambia: a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study with women, community groups and stakeholders.赞比亚卢阿普拉省母婴等候之家的经验和期望:一项采用混合方法、对妇女、社区团体和利益攸关方进行的横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1649-1.
3
Out-of-Pocket Expenditures for Delivery for Maternity Waiting Home Users and Non-users in Rural Zambia.赞比亚农村地区孕妇等待家庭用户和非用户的分娩自费支出。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1542-1549. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.61. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
4
Willingness to Pay for a Maternity Waiting Home Stay in Zambia.赞比亚产妇待产院住宿的支付意愿。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Mar;62(2):155-162. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12528. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
Barriers and facilitators to facility-based delivery in rural Zambia: a qualitative study of women's perceptions after implementation of an improved maternity waiting homes intervention.赞比亚农村地区医疗机构分娩的障碍和促进因素:改善产待所干预措施实施后对妇女认知的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 25;12(7):e058512. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058512.
6
Developing a community driven sustainable model of maternity waiting homes for rural Zambia.为赞比亚农村地区开发由社区驱动的产妇候产之家可持续模式。
Midwifery. 2016 Oct;41:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
7
Listening to the community: Using formative research to strengthen maternity waiting homes in Zambia.倾听社区的声音:利用形成性研究加强赞比亚的孕妇等候之家。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194535. eCollection 2018.
8
Improving access to skilled facility-based delivery services: Women's beliefs on facilitators and barriers to the utilisation of maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia.改善获得熟练的机构分娩服务的机会:赞比亚农村地区妇女对促进因素及产妇候产之家使用障碍的看法。
Reprod Health. 2015 Jul 8;12:61. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0051-6.
9
Maternity waiting homes in Ethiopia--three decades experience.埃塞俄比亚的产妇候产之家——三十年经验
Ethiop Med J. 2012 Jul;50(3):209-19.
10
Maternity waiting homes as part of a comprehensive approach to maternal and newborn care: a cross-sectional survey.产房产前护理之家作为母婴护理综合方法的一部分:一项横断面调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2384-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Provider and client perspectives on the use of maternity waiting homes in rural Rwanda.卢旺达农村地区使用母婴等候之家的提供者和客户观点。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2210881. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2210881.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing facility delivery through maternity waiting homes for women living far from a health facility in rural Zambia: a quasi-experimental study.通过为赞比亚农村地区远离医疗机构的妇女设立产妇候产之家来增加机构分娩率:一项准实验研究。
BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1804-1812. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16755. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
2
Maternity waiting homes as an intervention to increase facility delivery in rural Zambia.孕妇等候之家作为一种干预措施,以增加赞比亚农村地区的设施分娩量。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Aug;146(2):266-267. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12864. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
3
Maternity waiting areas - serving all women? Barriers and enablers of an equity-oriented maternal health intervention in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia.孕妇等候区——为所有妇女服务?在埃塞俄比亚 Jimma 地区,以公平为导向的母婴健康干预措施的障碍和促进因素。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Oct;14(10):1509-1523. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1597142. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
4
Household saving during pregnancy and facility delivery in Zambia: a cross-sectional study.赞比亚孕期和医疗机构分娩家庭储蓄情况:一项横断面研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Mar 1;34(2):102-109. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz005.
5
Characteristics of maternity waiting homes and the women who use them: Findings from a baseline cross-sectional household survey among SMGL-supported districts in Zambia.孕产妇等候之家的特点及其使用者:赞比亚 SMGL 支持地区基线横断面家庭调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 31;13(12):e0209815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209815. eCollection 2018.
6
"Well, not me, but other women do not register because..."- Barriers to seeking antenatal care in the context of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV among Zimbabwean women: a mixed-methods study.“嗯,不是我,而是其他女性没有注册,因为……”——津巴布韦预防艾滋病毒母婴传播背景下妇女寻求产前保健的障碍:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1898-7.
7
"Poverty is the big thing": exploring financial, transportation, and opportunity costs associated with fistula management and repair in Nigeria and Uganda.“贫穷是个大问题”:探讨尼日利亚和乌干达在管理和修复瘘管方面与经济、交通和机会相关的成本。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 1;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0777-1.
8
Listening to the community: Using formative research to strengthen maternity waiting homes in Zambia.倾听社区的声音:利用形成性研究加强赞比亚的孕妇等候之家。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194535. eCollection 2018.
9
Experiences with and expectations of maternity waiting homes in Luapula Province, Zambia: a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study with women, community groups and stakeholders.赞比亚卢阿普拉省母婴等候之家的经验和期望:一项采用混合方法、对妇女、社区团体和利益攸关方进行的横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1649-1.
10
Persisting demand and supply gap for maternal and newborn care in eastern Uganda: a mixed-method cross-sectional study.乌干达东部母婴保健需求与供应持续存在差距:一项混合方法的横断面研究。
Reprod Health. 2017 Oct 24;14(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0402-6.

赞比亚农村利用母婴等候之家的直接和机会成本。

Direct and opportunity costs related to utilizing maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N Ingalls St. Ann Arbor, MI 48104, United States.

School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2022 Feb;105:103211. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103211. Epub 2021 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2021.103211
PMID:34894428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8811481/
Abstract

AIM

To assess the direct and opportunity costs involved in utilising maternity waiting homes.

METHOD

A cross-sectional admission survey administered to women who used ten maternity waiting homes across two rural districts in Zambia. A total of 3,796 women participated in the survey. Descriptive analysis was conducted on three domains of the data: demographic characteristics of women, direct costs, and opportunity costs.

FINDINGS

Waiting to deliver (86.3%), safe birth (70.8%), and distance (56.0%) were the most frequent reasons women reported for using a maternity waiting home. In terms of direct costs, roughly 65% of the women brought seven days or fewer days' worth of food to the maternity waiting homes, with salt, mealie meals, and vegetables being the most frequently brought items. Only 5.8% of the women spent money on transport. More than half of the women reported paying user fees that ranged from 1 to 5 or more kwacha (US$0.10- 0.52). In terms of opportunity costs, 52% of the women participated in some form of income generating activities (IGAs) when at home. Approximately 35% of the women reported they lost earned income (1 to 50 or more kwacha) by staying at a maternity waiting home.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of women paid for food and user fees to access a maternity waiting home, while a low number of women paid for transport. Even though it is difficult to assign monetary value to women's household chores, being away from these responsibilities and the potential loss of earned income appear to remain a cost to accessing maternity waiting homes. More research is needed to understand how to overcome these financial constraints and assist women in utilising a maternity waiting home.

摘要

目的

评估利用母婴等候之家所涉及的直接成本和机会成本。

方法

对赞比亚两个农村地区的 10 家母婴等候之家使用的妇女进行横断面入院调查。共有 3796 名妇女参加了这项调查。对数据的三个领域进行了描述性分析:妇女的人口统计学特征、直接成本和机会成本。

结果

等待分娩(86.3%)、安全分娩(70.8%)和距离(56.0%)是妇女报告使用母婴等候之家的最常见原因。就直接成本而言,大约 65%的妇女带了七天或更少的食物到母婴等候之家,盐、玉米粉和蔬菜是最常带的物品。只有 5.8%的妇女花钱乘车。超过一半的妇女报告支付了从 1 到 5 或更多克瓦查(0.10-0.52 美元)不等的用户费用。就机会成本而言,52%的妇女在家时从事某种形式的创收活动(IGAs)。大约 35%的妇女报告说,由于住在母婴等候之家,她们失去了(1 到 50 或更多克瓦查)的已挣收入。

结论

很大一部分妇女为获得母婴等候之家的服务而支付食品和用户费用,而很少有妇女支付交通费用。尽管很难为妇女的家务劳动赋予货币价值,但离开这些责任和潜在的已挣收入损失似乎仍然是使用母婴等候之家的一种成本。需要进一步研究如何克服这些经济限制,帮助妇女利用母婴等候之家。