• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向全面儿童健康政策的衡量标准:综合儿童风险指数的效度及全国和州的流行率。

Toward Measurement for a Whole Child Health Policy: Validity and National and State Prevalence of the Integrated Child Risk Index.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative (C Bethell and N Gombojav), Baltimore, Md.

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Medical Social Sciences (CK Blackwell), Chicago, Ill.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2022 Aug;22(6):952-964. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2021.12.001
PMID:34896272
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop, validate and estimate national and across state prevalence on a multidimensional index that assesses the complex medical, social, and relational health risks experienced by United States children.

METHODS

Data from the National Survey of Children's Health were used to construct the Integrated Child Risk Index (ICRI) which includes medical health risk (MHR), social health risk (SHR) and relational health risk (RHR) domains. Confirmatory factor analysis and logistic regression analyses were employed to assess construct and predictive validity. Validity outcomes were child flourishing, school engagement/readiness, emergency room utilization and forgone care.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the ICRI 3-domain structure and greater correlation between MHR and RHR than MHR and SHR. Logistic regressions confirmed strong predictive validity of the ICRI for all study outcomes and ICRI scoring approaches. Nearly two-thirds of children (64.3%) with MHR also experienced SHR and/or RHR. Nearly one-third of United States children experienced risks on 2 or more ICRI domains and 15% of publicly insured children had risks on all domains (16.2%; 9.0%-25.7% across states). Significant variations were observed across states and by age, race/ethnicity, health insurance and household income.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICRI is a valid national and state level index associated with children's flourishing and educational preparedness and emergency and forgone care. National child health policies and Medicaid risk stratification and payment models should consider children's RHR in addition to SHR and MHR. Results call for integrated systems of care with the capacity to address medical, social and relational health risks and promote well-being. Substate and clinical applications require research.

摘要

目的

开发、验证并估计美国儿童多维指数的全国和州级流行率,该指数评估了美国儿童所经历的复杂医疗、社会和关系健康风险。

方法

使用国家儿童健康调查的数据构建综合儿童风险指数(ICRI),该指数包括医疗健康风险(MHR)、社会健康风险(SHR)和关系健康风险(RHR)领域。采用验证性因子分析和逻辑回归分析评估结构和预测效度。有效性结果包括儿童繁荣、学校参与/准备情况、急诊室利用和放弃护理。

结果

验证性因子分析证实了 ICRI 的 3 个领域结构,MHR 和 RHR 之间的相关性大于 MHR 和 SHR 之间的相关性。逻辑回归证实了 ICRI 对所有研究结果和 ICRI 评分方法的强大预测效度。近三分之二的有 MHR 的儿童(64.3%)也经历了 SHR 和/或 RHR。近三分之一的美国儿童在 2 个或更多 ICRI 领域存在风险,15%的有保险的儿童在所有领域都存在风险(16.2%;9.0%-25.7%,各州不同)。各州之间以及按年龄、种族/族裔、健康保险和家庭收入观察到显著差异。

结论

ICRI 是一个有效的全国和州级指数,与儿童的繁荣和教育准备以及急诊和放弃护理有关。国家儿童健康政策和医疗补助风险分层和支付模式应考虑儿童的 RHR,除 SHR 和 MHR 之外。结果呼吁建立有能力解决医疗、社会和关系健康风险并促进福祉的综合护理系统。州以下和临床应用需要研究。

相似文献

1
Toward Measurement for a Whole Child Health Policy: Validity and National and State Prevalence of the Integrated Child Risk Index.迈向全面儿童健康政策的衡量标准:综合儿童风险指数的效度及全国和州的流行率。
Acad Pediatr. 2022 Aug;22(6):952-964. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
2
Methods to Assess Adverse Childhood Experiences of Children and Families: Toward Approaches to Promote Child Well-being in Policy and Practice.评估儿童和家庭不良童年经历的方法:促进政策和实践中儿童福祉的方法。
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7S):S51-S69. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.161.
3
Family Resilience And Connection Promote Flourishing Among US Children, Even Amid Adversity.美国家庭的韧性和联系促进了儿童的茁壮成长,即使在逆境中也是如此。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 May;38(5):729-737. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05425.
4
Children with special health care needs enrolled in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP): patient characteristics and health care needs.参加州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的有特殊医疗保健需求的儿童:患者特征与医疗保健需求。
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e508.
5
A national and state profile of leading health problems and health care quality for US children: key insurance disparities and across-state variations.美国儿童主要健康问题和医疗保健质量的国家和州概况:主要保险差距和州际差异。
Acad Pediatr. 2011 May-Jun;11(3 Suppl):S22-33. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.08.011.
6
Prioritizing Possibilities for Child and Family Health: An Agenda to Address Adverse Childhood Experiences and Foster the Social and Emotional Roots of Well-being in Pediatrics.优先考虑儿童和家庭健康的可能性:解决不良儿童经历问题并促进儿科学中幸福感的社会和情感根源的议程。
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7S):S36-S50. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.06.002.
7
Geographic disparities in access to the medical home among US CSHCN.美国儿童和青少年 CSHCN 获得医疗之家机会的地理差异。
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124 Suppl 4:S352-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1255E.
8
Using existing population-based data sets to measure the American Academy of Pediatrics definition of medical home for all children and children with special health care needs.利用现有的基于人群的数据集,衡量美国儿科学会对所有儿童及有特殊医疗保健需求儿童的医疗之家定义。
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5 Suppl):1529-37.
9
The Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act quality measures initiatives: moving forward to improve measurement, care, and child and adolescent outcomes.《儿童健康保险计划再授权法案》质量措施倡议:为改善衡量标准、医疗服务以及儿童和青少年的健康结果而努力。
Acad Pediatr. 2011 May-Jun;11(3 Suppl):S1-S10. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.02.009.
10
What is the prevalence of children with special health care needs? Toward an understanding of variations in findings and methods across three national surveys.有特殊医疗保健需求的儿童的患病率是多少?旨在理解三项全国性调查结果和方法的差异。
Matern Child Health J. 2008 Jan;12(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0220-5. Epub 2007 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of early childhood education and care on the relation between early-life social adversity and children's mental health in the environmental influences for Child Health Outcomes Program.儿童健康结果项目环境影响中,早期儿童教育与照料对早期生活社会逆境与儿童心理健康之间关系的影响。
Dev Psychopathol. 2024 Dec 10:1-19. doi: 10.1017/S0954579424001822.
2
An Examination of Underlying Domains in Childhood Adversity: A Scoping Review of Studies Conducting Factor Analyses on Adverse Childhood Experiences.童年逆境中潜在领域的考察:对进行不良童年经历因素分析的研究的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 30;21(11):1441. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21111441.
3
Measuring PROMIS® Well-Being in Early Childhood.
测量婴幼儿期的 PROMIS® 健康状况。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2022 May 13;47(5):559-572. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsac030.
4
Measuring PROMIS® Social Relationships in Early Childhood.测量儿童早期的 PROMIS®社会关系。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2022 May 13;47(5):573-584. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsac031.