The Ohio State University College of Medicine (O.P.), Columbus, Ohio, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (C.M.H.), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine (P.G., L.T.S.), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio USA; Clinical Analytics (J.D.S.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio USA; Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine (C.R.G.), New York University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, New York, New York, USA.
The Ohio State University College of Medicine (O.P.), Columbus, Ohio, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (C.M.H.), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine (P.G., L.T.S.), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio USA; Clinical Analytics (J.D.S.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio USA; Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine (C.R.G.), New York University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, New York, New York, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 May;63(5):e489-e494. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
Emergency Departments (EDs) care for people at critical junctures in their illness trajectories, but Advanced Care Planning (ACP) seldom happens during ED visits. One barrier to incorporating patient goals into ED care may be locating ACP documents in the electronic health record (EHR).
To determine the ease and accuracy of locating ACP documentation in the EHR during an ED visit.
Academic ED with 82,000 visits per year. The EHR system includes a Storyboard with the patient's code status and a link to ACP documents. A real-time chart audit study was performed of ED patients who were either ≥65 years old or had a cancer diagnosis. Data elements included age, Emergency Severity Index, ACP document location(s) in the EHR, Storyboard accuracy, ED code status orders, and discussions of ACP or code status.
Of the 160 audited charts, 51 (32%) were for adults <65 years old with a cancer diagnosis. Code status was discussed and updated during the ED visit in 68% (n=108). ACP documents were found in 3 different EHR places. Only 30% (n=48) had ACP documents in the EHR, and of these (22%, n=13) were found in only one of the three EHR locations. The Storyboard was inaccurate for 5% (n=8). ED case managers frequently discussed APC documentation (78%, 43/55 charts).
Even under optimal conditions with social work availability, ACP documents are lacking for ED patients. Multiple potential locations of ACP documents and inaccurate linkage to the Storyboard are potentially addressable barriers to ACP conversations.
急诊科(ED)在患者疾病进程的关键节点照顾患者,但在 ED 就诊期间很少进行预先医疗指示(ACP)。将患者目标纳入 ED 护理的一个障碍可能是在电子健康记录(EHR)中定位 ACP 文档。
确定在 ED 就诊期间在 EHR 中定位 ACP 文档的难易程度和准确性。
拥有每年 82000 次就诊量的学术 ED。EHR 系统包括一个带有患者代码状态的故事板以及指向 ACP 文档的链接。对 ED 患者进行了实时图表审核研究,这些患者要么年龄≥65 岁,要么患有癌症诊断。数据元素包括年龄、紧急严重程度指数、EHR 中 ACP 文档的位置、故事板准确性、ED 代码状态医嘱以及 ACP 或代码状态的讨论。
在审核的 160 份图表中,51 份(32%)为年龄<65 岁且患有癌症诊断的成年人。在 ED 就诊期间讨论并更新了代码状态,占 68%(n=108)。在 3 个不同的 EHR 位置找到了 ACP 文档。只有 30%(n=48)的患者在 EHR 中有 ACP 文档,其中(22%,n=13)仅在这 3 个 EHR 位置中的一个位置找到。故事板不准确的占 5%(n=8)。ED 个案经理经常讨论 APC 文档(78%,43/55 份图表)。
即使在有社会工作者可用的最佳条件下,ED 患者的 ACP 文档也不足。ACP 文档的多个潜在位置以及与故事板的链接不准确,可能是 ACP 对话的潜在障碍。