• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济学和社会心理学在提高阿片类药物处方安全试验中的应用协议 2(AESOPS-2):阿片类药物危害的可及性。

The protocol of the Application of Economics & Social psychology to improve Opioid Prescribing Safety trial 2 (AESOPS-2): Availability of opioid harm.

机构信息

Schaeffer Center for Health Economics and Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America; School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Jan;112:106650. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106650. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2021.106650
PMID:34896295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8869359/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High levels of opioid prescribing in the United States has resulted in an alarming trend in opioid-related harms. The objective of Trial 2 of the Application of Economics & Social psychology to improve Opioid Prescribing Safety (AESOPS-2) is to dampen the intensity and frequency of opioid prescribing in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendation to "go low and slow". We aim to accomplish this by notifying clinicians of harmful patient outcomes, which we expect to increase the mental availability of risks associated with opioid use.

METHODS

The trial is multi-site. Random assignment determines if prescribers to persons who suffer an opioid overdose (fatal or nonfatal) learn of this event (intervention) or practice usual care (control). Clinicians in the intervention group receive a letter notifying them of their patient's overdose. The primary outcome is the change in clinician weekly milligram morphine equivalent (MME) prescribed in a 6-month period before and after receiving the letter. Additional outcomes are the change in the proportion of patients prescribed at least 50 daily MME and in the proportion of patients referred to medication assisted treatment. Group differences in these outcomes will be compared using an intent-to-treat difference-in-differences framework with a mixed-effects regression model to estimate clinician MME.

DISCUSSION

The AESOPS-2 trial will provide new knowledge about whether increasing prescribers' awareness of patients' opioid-related overdoses leads to a reduction in opioid prescribing. Additionally, this trial may better inform how to reduce opioid use disorder and opioid overdoses by lowering population exposure to these drugs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04758637.

摘要

背景

美国阿片类药物处方水平较高,导致阿片类药物相关危害呈惊人趋势。应用经济学和社会心理学改善阿片类药物处方安全(AESOPS-2)试验 2 的目的是根据疾病控制和预防中心的建议“降低剂量,缓慢增加”,减少阿片类药物的开具强度和频率。我们希望通过通知临床医生患者发生有害后果,来实现这一目标,这预计会增加与阿片类药物使用相关风险的心理可及性。

方法

该试验是多地点的。随机分组决定遭受阿片类药物过量(致命或非致命)的患者的处方医生是否了解这一事件(干预组)或接受常规护理(对照组)。干预组的临床医生会收到一封信,通知他们的患者发生了阿片类药物过量。主要结果是在收到信前后 6 个月内临床医生每周开具的毫克吗啡当量(MME)的变化。其他结果是至少开具 50 每日 MME 的患者比例和接受药物辅助治疗的患者比例的变化。使用意向治疗差异-差异框架和混合效应回归模型比较这些结果的组间差异,以估计临床医生的 MME。

讨论

AESOPS-2 试验将提供新的知识,即增加临床医生对患者阿片类药物相关过量的认识是否会导致阿片类药物处方减少。此外,通过降低人群对这些药物的接触,该试验可能更好地告知如何减少阿片类药物使用障碍和阿片类药物过量。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04758637。

相似文献

1
The protocol of the Application of Economics & Social psychology to improve Opioid Prescribing Safety trial 2 (AESOPS-2): Availability of opioid harm.经济学和社会心理学在提高阿片类药物处方安全试验中的应用协议 2(AESOPS-2):阿片类药物危害的可及性。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Jan;112:106650. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106650. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
2
The protocol of the Application of Economics & Social psychology to improve Opioid Prescribing Safety Trial 1 (AESOPS-1): Electronic health record nudges.经济学与社会心理学在提高阿片类药物处方安全试验 1(AESOPS-1)中的应用方案:电子健康记录提示。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;103:106329. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106329. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
3
Effect of Changing Electronic Health Record Opioid Analgesic Dispense Quantity Defaults on the Quantity Prescribed: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.改变电子健康记录阿片类镇痛药配给数量默认值对处方数量的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217481. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7481.
4
Association of the 2016 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Opioid Prescribing Guideline With Changes in Opioid Dispensing After Surgery.2016 年美国疾病控制与预防中心阿片类药物处方指南与术后阿片类药物配药变化的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2111826. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11826.
5
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.受控物质处方模式 - 处方行为监测系统,八个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
6
Strategies to Deimplement Opioid Prescribing in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.在初级保健中停用阿片类药物处方的策略:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438325. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38325.
7
The Balanced Opioid Initiative: protocol for a clustered, sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial to construct an adaptive implementation strategy to improve guideline-concordant opioid prescribing in primary care.平衡阿片类药物倡议:一项整群、序贯、多分配随机试验的方案,以构建一种适应性实施策略,改善初级保健中符合指南的阿片类药物处方。
Implement Sci. 2020 Apr 25;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-00990-4.
8
Vital Signs: Changes in Opioid Prescribing in the United States, 2006-2015.生命体征:2006 - 2015年美国阿片类药物处方的变化
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jul 7;66(26):697-704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6626a4.
9
Individualized prescribing portraits to reduce inappropriate initiation of opioid analgesics to opioid naïve patients in primary care: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.个体化处方画像以减少初级保健中阿片类药物初治患者不合理使用阿片类药物镇痛:一项随机对照试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106462. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106462. Epub 2021 May 31.
10
Effect of reductions in opioid prescribing on opioid use disorder and fatal overdose in the United States: a dynamic Markov model.美国阿片类药物处方减少对阿片类药物使用障碍和致命过量用药的影响:动态马尔可夫模型
Addiction. 2022 Apr;117(4):969-976. doi: 10.1111/add.15698. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
The protocol of the Application of Economics & Social psychology to improve Opioid Prescribing Safety Trial 1 (AESOPS-1): Electronic health record nudges.经济学与社会心理学在提高阿片类药物处方安全试验 1(AESOPS-1)中的应用方案:电子健康记录提示。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;103:106329. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106329. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
2
Strategies to Identify Patient Risks of Prescription Opioid Addiction When Initiating Opioids for Pain: A Systematic Review.当开始使用阿片类药物治疗疼痛时识别患者处方阿片类药物成瘾风险的策略:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193365. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3365.
3
No Shortcuts to Safer Opioid Prescribing.安全开具阿片类药物处方没有捷径可走。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2285-2287. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1904190. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
4
Challenges with Implementing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Opioid Guideline: A Consensus Panel Report.实施疾病预防控制中心阿片类药物指南的挑战:共识小组报告。
Pain Med. 2019 Apr 1;20(4):724-735. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny307.
5
Opioid prescribing decreases after learning of a patient's fatal overdose.在了解到患者致命过量用药后,阿片类药物的处方量会减少。
Science. 2018 Aug 10;361(6402):588-590. doi: 10.1126/science.aat4595.
6
Effect of Opioid vs Nonopioid Medications on Pain-Related Function in Patients With Chronic Back Pain or Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: The SPACE Randomized Clinical Trial.阿片类药物与非阿片类药物对慢性背痛或髋部或膝部骨关节炎疼痛患者疼痛相关功能的影响:SPACE随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Mar 6;319(9):872-882. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0899.
7
Rethinking "doing well" on chronic opioid therapy.重新审视慢性阿片类药物治疗中的“疗效良好”
CMAJ. 2017 Oct 2;189(39):E1222-E1223. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170628.
8
Vital Signs: Changes in Opioid Prescribing in the United States, 2006-2015.生命体征:2006 - 2015年美国阿片类药物处方的变化
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jul 7;66(26):697-704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6626a4.
9
The Economic Burden of Prescription Opioid Overdose, Abuse, and Dependence in the United States, 2013.2013年美国处方阿片类药物过量、滥用及成瘾的经济负担
Med Care. 2016 Oct;54(10):901-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000625.
10
Promoting protection against a threat that evokes positive affect: The case of heat waves in the United Kingdom.促进针对引发积极情感的威胁的防护:以英国热浪为例。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2016 Sep;22(3):261-71. doi: 10.1037/xap0000083. Epub 2016 Jun 6.