• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用快速 Pitt 菌血症评分预测金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的死亡率。

Prediction of mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection using quick Pitt bacteremia score.

机构信息

University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Prisma Health-Midlands, Columbia, SC, United States of America.

University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC, United States of America.

出版信息

J Infect. 2022 Feb;84(2):131-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.002
PMID:34896517
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The quick Pitt bacteremia score (qPitt) predicts mortality in patients with serious infections due to gram-negative bacteria. This retrospective cohort study examines utility of qPitt to predict mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB).

METHODS

Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine risk factors for 28-day mortality in hospitalized adults with SAB at four Prisma Health hospitals in South Carolina, USA from January 2015 to December 2017. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to examine model discrimination.

RESULTS

Among 692 patients with SAB, 305 (44%) had methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and 129 (19%) died within 28 days. After adjustment for age, comorbidities, and MRSA, each component of the qPitt was associated with 28-day mortality. There was a 3-fold increase in the risk of 28-day mortality for each one-point increase in qPitt. Predicted 28-day mortality was 3%, 9%, 22%, 45%, and 70% for qPitt of 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4, respectively. AUROC of the qPitt in predicting 28-day, 14-day, and in-hospital mortality were 0.80, 0.81, and 0.80, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The qPitt predicts mortality with good discrimination in SAB. These results support using qPitt as a measure of acute severity of illness in future studies.

摘要

目的

快速 Pitt 菌血症评分(qPitt)可预测革兰氏阴性菌引起的严重感染患者的死亡率。本回顾性队列研究旨在探讨 qPitt 在预测金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染(SAB)患者死亡率中的作用。

方法

采用多变量逻辑回归分析 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月美国南卡罗来纳州 4 家 Prisma Health 医院住院成人 SAB 患者 28 天死亡率的危险因素。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评估模型的判别能力。

结果

在 692 例 SAB 患者中,305 例(44%)为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA),129 例(19%)在 28 天内死亡。在调整年龄、合并症和 MRSA 后,qPitt 的每个组成部分均与 28 天死亡率相关。qPitt 每增加 1 分,28 天死亡率的风险增加 3 倍。qPitt 评分为 0、1、2、3 和≥4 时,预测 28 天死亡率分别为 3%、9%、22%、45%和 70%。qPitt 预测 28 天、14 天和住院死亡率的 AUROC 分别为 0.80、0.81 和 0.80。

结论

qPitt 可较好地区分 SAB 患者的死亡率。这些结果支持在未来的研究中使用 qPitt 作为评估急性疾病严重程度的指标。

相似文献

1
Prediction of mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection using quick Pitt bacteremia score.应用快速 Pitt 菌血症评分预测金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的死亡率。
J Infect. 2022 Feb;84(2):131-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
2
Derivation of a quick Pitt bacteremia score to predict mortality in patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection.快速 Pitt 菌血症评分的推导,以预测革兰氏阴性菌血流感染患者的死亡率。
Infection. 2019 Aug;47(4):571-578. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01277-7. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
3
Acute kidney injury should not be neglected - optimization of quick Pitt bacteremia score for predicting mortality in critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a retrospective cohort study.急性肾损伤不容忽视——优化快速皮特菌血症评分以预测重症血流感染患者的死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 23;11:20499361241231147. doi: 10.1177/20499361241231147. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Relationship of C-reactive Protein/Serum Albumin Ratio and qPitt Bacteremia Score With An All-Cause In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Bloodstream Infections.C反应蛋白/血清白蛋白比值及qPitt菌血症评分与血流感染患者全因住院死亡率的关系
Cureus. 2024 Aug 10;16(8):e66584. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66584. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Prediction of 30-Day Mortality Using the Quick Pitt Bacteremia Score in Hospitalized Patients with Infection.使用快速匹兹堡菌血症评分预测住院感染患者的30天死亡率。
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Jul 25;16:4807-4815. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S420569. eCollection 2023.
6
Predictive Value of a Quick Pitt Bacteremia Score for Prognosis of Patients with Bloodstream Infection Secondary to Urinary Tract Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.快速匹兹堡菌血症评分对尿路感染继发血流感染患者预后的预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究
Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Aug 10;15:4381-4391. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S373998. eCollection 2022.
7
Comparison of quick Pitt to quick sofa and sofa scores for scoring of severity for patients with urinary tract infection.比较 Pitt 快速评分与 quick sofa 评分和 sofa 评分在尿路感染患者严重程度评分中的应用。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Aug;17(5):1321-1326. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-02927-9. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
8
Association of methicillin resistance with mortality of hospital-acquired bacteremia.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌医院获得性菌血症相关性死亡率研究
J Int Med Res. 2021 Nov;49(11):3000605211058872. doi: 10.1177/03000605211058872.
9
Bacteremia in Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia: outcomes and epidemiology.金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎合并菌血症:结局与流行病学。
J Crit Care. 2011 Aug;26(4):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
10
A Prospective Cohort Study of Durations of Bacteremia According to Different Phenotypes and a New Concept of Persistent Bacteremia.一项关于不同表型下菌血症持续时间的前瞻性队列研究和一个新的持续性菌血症概念。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Dec 20;64(1). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01656-19.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical characteristics and efficacy of short-course antibiotic therapy for bacteremia in hematological patients.血液学患者菌血症短程抗生素治疗的临床特征及疗效
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Sep 2;13(9):e0232524. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02325-24. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
2
Pitt candidaemia score as an assessment tool for mortality in patients with candidaemia caused by and other species: a multicentre study conducted in Japan.皮特念珠菌血症评分作为评估由白色念珠菌和其他念珠菌属引起的念珠菌血症患者死亡率的工具:一项在日本开展的多中心研究。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 May 20;7(3):dlaf078. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf078. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Early initiation of ceftaroline-based combination therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.
基于头孢洛林的联合疗法用于耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的早期启动。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2025 Jan 13;24(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12941-025-00773-z.
4
Patterns, Outcomes and Economic Burden of Primary vs. Secondary Bloodstream Infections: A Single Center, Cross-Sectional Study.原发性与继发性血流感染的模式、结局及经济负担:一项单中心横断面研究
Pathogens. 2024 Aug 9;13(8):677. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13080677.
5
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales sepsis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: risk factors for 30-day all-cause mortality and the development of a nomogram based on a retrospective cohort.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌败血症:30天全因死亡率的危险因素及基于回顾性队列的列线图的构建
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Aug 7;13(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01441-1.
6
Female Sex and Mortality in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.女性性别与金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者的死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e240473. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0473.
7
Acute kidney injury should not be neglected - optimization of quick Pitt bacteremia score for predicting mortality in critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a retrospective cohort study.急性肾损伤不容忽视——优化快速皮特菌血症评分以预测重症血流感染患者的死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 23;11:20499361241231147. doi: 10.1177/20499361241231147. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Patient predictors of pathogenic versus commensal Gram-positive bacilli organisms isolated from blood cultures.从血培养中分离出的致病性与共生性革兰氏阳性杆菌微生物的患者预测因素。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 18;3(1):e245. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.506. eCollection 2023.
9
Prediction of 30-Day Mortality Using the Quick Pitt Bacteremia Score in Hospitalized Patients with Infection [Response to Letter].使用快速匹兹堡菌血症评分预测住院感染患者的30天死亡率[对信件的回复]
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Aug 23;16:5549-5550. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S434882. eCollection 2023.
10
Prediction of 30-Day Mortality Using the Quick Pitt Bacteremia Score in Hospitalized Patients with Infection.使用快速匹兹堡菌血症评分预测住院感染患者的30天死亡率。
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Jul 25;16:4807-4815. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S420569. eCollection 2023.