Suppr超能文献

经皮臭氧髓核溶解术与椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症根性神经病:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。

Intradiscal oxygen-ozone chemonucleolysis versus microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation radiculopathy: a non-inferiority randomized control trial.

机构信息

University General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Haidari 12462, Greece.

Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Lombardia 24127, Italy.

出版信息

Spine J. 2022 Jun;22(6):895-909. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Low back pain with or without radicular leg pain is an extremely common health condition significantly impacting patient's activities and quality of life. When conservative management fails, epidural injections providing only temporary relief, are frequently utilized. Intradiscal oxygen-ozone may offer an alternative to epidural injections and further reduce the need for microdiscectomy.

PURPOSE

To compare the non-inferiority treatment status and clinical outcomes of intradiscal oxygen-ozone with microdiscectomy in patients with refractory radicular leg pain due to single-level contained lumbar disc herniations.

STUDY DESIGN / SETTING: Multicenter pilot prospective non-inferiority blocked randomized control trial conducted in three European hospital spine centers.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Forty-nine patients (mean 40 years of age, 17 females/32 males) with a single-level contained lumbar disc herniation, radicular leg pain for more than six weeks, and resistant to medical management were randomized, 25 to intradiscal oxygen-ozone and 24 to microdiscectomy. 88% (43 of 49) received their assigned treatment and constituted the AS-Treated (AT) population.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was overall 6-month improvement over baseline in leg pain. Other validated clinical outcomes, including back numerical rating pain scores (NRS), Roland Morris Disability Index (RMDI) and EQ-5D, were collected at baseline, 1 week, 1-, 3-, and 6-months. Procedural technical outcomes were recorded and adverse events were evaluated at all follow-up intervals.

METHODS

Oxygen-ozone treatment performed as outpatient day surgeries, included a one-time intradiscal injection delivered at a concentration of 35±3 μg/cc of oxygen-ozone by a calibrated delivery system. Discectomies performed as open microdiscectomy inpatient surgeries, were without spinal instrumentation, and not as subtotal microdiscectomies. Primary analyses with a non-inferiority margin of -1.94-point difference in 6-month cumulative weighted mean leg pain NRS scores were conducted using As-Treated (AT) and Intent-to-Treat (ITT) populations. In post hoc analyses, differences between treatment groups in improvement over baseline were compared at each follow-up visit, using baseline leg pain as a covariate.

RESULTS

In the primary analysis, the overall 6-month difference between treatment groups in leg pain improvement using the AT population was -0.31 (SE, 0.84) points in favor of microdiscectomy and using the ITT population, the difference was 0.32 (SE, 0.88) points in favor of oxygen-ozone. The difference between oxygen-ozone and microdiscectomy did not exceed the non-inferiority 95% confidence lower limit of treatment difference in either the AT (95% lower limit, -1.72) or ITT (95% lower limit, -1.13) populations. Both treatments resulted in rapid and statistically significant improvements over baseline in leg pain, back pain, RMDI, and EQ-5D that persisted in follow-up. Between group differences were not significant for any outcomes. During 6-month follow-up, 71% (17 of 24) of patients receiving oxygen-ozone, avoided microdiscectomy. The mean procedure time for oxygen-ozone was significantly faster than microdiscectomy by 58 minutes (p<.0010) and the mean discharge time from procedure was significantly shorter for the oxygen-ozone procedure (4.3±2.9 hours vs. 44.2±29.9 hours, p<.001). No major adverse events occurred in either treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intradiscal oxygen-ozone chemonucleolysis for single-level lumbar disc herniations unresponsive to medical management, met the non-inferiority criteria to microdiscectomy on 6-month mean leg pain improvement. Both treatment groups achieved similar rapid significant clinical improvements that persisted and overall, 71% undergoing intradiscal oxygen-ozone were able to avoid surgery.

摘要

背景语境

腰痛伴或不伴神经根性腿痛是一种极其常见的健康状况,显著影响患者的活动和生活质量。当保守治疗失败时,硬膜外注射只能提供暂时缓解,因此经常被采用。椎间盘内氧-臭氧治疗可能是硬膜外注射的一种替代方法,并进一步减少微椎间盘切除术的需求。

目的

比较单节段腰椎间盘突出症引起的难治性神经根性腿痛患者接受椎间盘内氧-臭氧与微椎间盘切除术的非劣效性治疗状况和临床结果。

研究设计/设置:在三个欧洲医院脊柱中心进行的多中心前瞻性非劣效性随机对照试验。

患者样本

49 名患者(平均年龄 40 岁,17 名女性/32 名男性),患有单节段腰椎间盘突出症,神经根性腿痛超过六周,且对药物治疗有抵抗。将他们随机分为 25 名接受椎间盘内氧-臭氧治疗和 24 名接受微椎间盘切除术。88%(43/49)接受了他们指定的治疗,并构成了 AS 治疗(AT)人群。

主要结果

主要结果是腿部疼痛在 6 个月时与基线相比的总体改善。其他经过验证的临床结果,包括背部数字评分疼痛量表(NRS)、Roland Morris 残疾指数(RMDI)和 EQ-5D,在基线、1 周、1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月时收集。记录了程序技术结果,并在所有随访期间评估了不良事件。

方法

氧-臭氧治疗作为门诊日手术进行,包括一次性椎间盘内注射,使用校准输送系统以 35±3μg/cc 的浓度输送氧气-臭氧。椎间盘切除术作为开放式微创手术进行,没有脊柱器械,也不作为次全切除术。使用非劣效性边际为 6 个月累积加权平均腿部疼痛 NRS 评分差异 -1.94 分的主要分析,使用 AT 和 ITT 人群进行分析。在事后分析中,使用腿部疼痛作为协变量,在每个随访时间点比较治疗组的改善情况。

结果

在主要分析中,使用 AT 人群,治疗组在腿部疼痛改善方面的 6 个月总体差异为 -0.31(SE,0.84)点,有利于微椎间盘切除术,而使用 ITT 人群,差异为 0.32(SE,0.88)点,有利于氧-臭氧。在 AT(95%置信下限,-1.72)和 ITT(95%置信下限,-1.13)人群中,氧-臭氧与微椎间盘切除术之间的差异均未超过非劣效性 95%置信下限的治疗差异。两种治疗方法都在腿部疼痛、背部疼痛、RMDI 和 EQ-5D 方面迅速且具有统计学意义的改善,在随访中持续存在。在任何结果中,组间差异均不显著。在 6 个月的随访中,71%(24 名患者中的 17 名)接受氧-臭氧治疗的患者避免了微椎间盘切除术。氧-臭氧的平均手术时间比微椎间盘切除术显著快 58 分钟(p<.0010),并且氧-臭氧手术的平均出院时间显著短(4.3±2.9 小时与 44.2±29.9 小时,p<.001)。两种治疗方法均未发生重大不良事件。

结论

对于对药物治疗无反应的单节段腰椎间盘突出症,椎间盘内氧-臭氧化学核溶解术在 6 个月的平均腿部疼痛改善方面达到了微椎间盘切除术的非劣效性标准。两组治疗均实现了类似的快速显著的临床改善,且持续存在,总体而言,71%接受椎间盘内氧-臭氧治疗的患者能够避免手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验