• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮臭氧髓核溶解术与椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症根性神经病:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。

Intradiscal oxygen-ozone chemonucleolysis versus microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation radiculopathy: a non-inferiority randomized control trial.

机构信息

University General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Haidari 12462, Greece.

Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Lombardia 24127, Italy.

出版信息

Spine J. 2022 Jun;22(6):895-909. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.11.017
PMID:34896609
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Low back pain with or without radicular leg pain is an extremely common health condition significantly impacting patient's activities and quality of life. When conservative management fails, epidural injections providing only temporary relief, are frequently utilized. Intradiscal oxygen-ozone may offer an alternative to epidural injections and further reduce the need for microdiscectomy.

PURPOSE

To compare the non-inferiority treatment status and clinical outcomes of intradiscal oxygen-ozone with microdiscectomy in patients with refractory radicular leg pain due to single-level contained lumbar disc herniations.

STUDY DESIGN / SETTING: Multicenter pilot prospective non-inferiority blocked randomized control trial conducted in three European hospital spine centers.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Forty-nine patients (mean 40 years of age, 17 females/32 males) with a single-level contained lumbar disc herniation, radicular leg pain for more than six weeks, and resistant to medical management were randomized, 25 to intradiscal oxygen-ozone and 24 to microdiscectomy. 88% (43 of 49) received their assigned treatment and constituted the AS-Treated (AT) population.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was overall 6-month improvement over baseline in leg pain. Other validated clinical outcomes, including back numerical rating pain scores (NRS), Roland Morris Disability Index (RMDI) and EQ-5D, were collected at baseline, 1 week, 1-, 3-, and 6-months. Procedural technical outcomes were recorded and adverse events were evaluated at all follow-up intervals.

METHODS

Oxygen-ozone treatment performed as outpatient day surgeries, included a one-time intradiscal injection delivered at a concentration of 35±3 μg/cc of oxygen-ozone by a calibrated delivery system. Discectomies performed as open microdiscectomy inpatient surgeries, were without spinal instrumentation, and not as subtotal microdiscectomies. Primary analyses with a non-inferiority margin of -1.94-point difference in 6-month cumulative weighted mean leg pain NRS scores were conducted using As-Treated (AT) and Intent-to-Treat (ITT) populations. In post hoc analyses, differences between treatment groups in improvement over baseline were compared at each follow-up visit, using baseline leg pain as a covariate.

RESULTS

In the primary analysis, the overall 6-month difference between treatment groups in leg pain improvement using the AT population was -0.31 (SE, 0.84) points in favor of microdiscectomy and using the ITT population, the difference was 0.32 (SE, 0.88) points in favor of oxygen-ozone. The difference between oxygen-ozone and microdiscectomy did not exceed the non-inferiority 95% confidence lower limit of treatment difference in either the AT (95% lower limit, -1.72) or ITT (95% lower limit, -1.13) populations. Both treatments resulted in rapid and statistically significant improvements over baseline in leg pain, back pain, RMDI, and EQ-5D that persisted in follow-up. Between group differences were not significant for any outcomes. During 6-month follow-up, 71% (17 of 24) of patients receiving oxygen-ozone, avoided microdiscectomy. The mean procedure time for oxygen-ozone was significantly faster than microdiscectomy by 58 minutes (p<.0010) and the mean discharge time from procedure was significantly shorter for the oxygen-ozone procedure (4.3±2.9 hours vs. 44.2±29.9 hours, p<.001). No major adverse events occurred in either treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intradiscal oxygen-ozone chemonucleolysis for single-level lumbar disc herniations unresponsive to medical management, met the non-inferiority criteria to microdiscectomy on 6-month mean leg pain improvement. Both treatment groups achieved similar rapid significant clinical improvements that persisted and overall, 71% undergoing intradiscal oxygen-ozone were able to avoid surgery.

摘要

背景语境

腰痛伴或不伴神经根性腿痛是一种极其常见的健康状况,显著影响患者的活动和生活质量。当保守治疗失败时,硬膜外注射只能提供暂时缓解,因此经常被采用。椎间盘内氧-臭氧治疗可能是硬膜外注射的一种替代方法,并进一步减少微椎间盘切除术的需求。

目的

比较单节段腰椎间盘突出症引起的难治性神经根性腿痛患者接受椎间盘内氧-臭氧与微椎间盘切除术的非劣效性治疗状况和临床结果。

研究设计/设置:在三个欧洲医院脊柱中心进行的多中心前瞻性非劣效性随机对照试验。

患者样本

49 名患者(平均年龄 40 岁,17 名女性/32 名男性),患有单节段腰椎间盘突出症,神经根性腿痛超过六周,且对药物治疗有抵抗。将他们随机分为 25 名接受椎间盘内氧-臭氧治疗和 24 名接受微椎间盘切除术。88%(43/49)接受了他们指定的治疗,并构成了 AS 治疗(AT)人群。

主要结果

主要结果是腿部疼痛在 6 个月时与基线相比的总体改善。其他经过验证的临床结果,包括背部数字评分疼痛量表(NRS)、Roland Morris 残疾指数(RMDI)和 EQ-5D,在基线、1 周、1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月时收集。记录了程序技术结果,并在所有随访期间评估了不良事件。

方法

氧-臭氧治疗作为门诊日手术进行,包括一次性椎间盘内注射,使用校准输送系统以 35±3μg/cc 的浓度输送氧气-臭氧。椎间盘切除术作为开放式微创手术进行,没有脊柱器械,也不作为次全切除术。使用非劣效性边际为 6 个月累积加权平均腿部疼痛 NRS 评分差异 -1.94 分的主要分析,使用 AT 和 ITT 人群进行分析。在事后分析中,使用腿部疼痛作为协变量,在每个随访时间点比较治疗组的改善情况。

结果

在主要分析中,使用 AT 人群,治疗组在腿部疼痛改善方面的 6 个月总体差异为 -0.31(SE,0.84)点,有利于微椎间盘切除术,而使用 ITT 人群,差异为 0.32(SE,0.88)点,有利于氧-臭氧。在 AT(95%置信下限,-1.72)和 ITT(95%置信下限,-1.13)人群中,氧-臭氧与微椎间盘切除术之间的差异均未超过非劣效性 95%置信下限的治疗差异。两种治疗方法都在腿部疼痛、背部疼痛、RMDI 和 EQ-5D 方面迅速且具有统计学意义的改善,在随访中持续存在。在任何结果中,组间差异均不显著。在 6 个月的随访中,71%(24 名患者中的 17 名)接受氧-臭氧治疗的患者避免了微椎间盘切除术。氧-臭氧的平均手术时间比微椎间盘切除术显著快 58 分钟(p<.0010),并且氧-臭氧手术的平均出院时间显著短(4.3±2.9 小时与 44.2±29.9 小时,p<.001)。两种治疗方法均未发生重大不良事件。

结论

对于对药物治疗无反应的单节段腰椎间盘突出症,椎间盘内氧-臭氧化学核溶解术在 6 个月的平均腿部疼痛改善方面达到了微椎间盘切除术的非劣效性标准。两组治疗均实现了类似的快速显著的临床改善,且持续存在,总体而言,71%接受椎间盘内氧-臭氧治疗的患者能够避免手术。

相似文献

1
Intradiscal oxygen-ozone chemonucleolysis versus microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation radiculopathy: a non-inferiority randomized control trial.经皮臭氧髓核溶解术与椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症根性神经病:一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2022 Jun;22(6):895-909. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
2
Efficacy of Intradiscal Ozone Therapy with or without Periforaminal Steroid Injection on Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Double-Blinded Controlled Study.经皮椎间孔臭氧治疗联合或不联合周围神经周围类固醇注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效:一项双盲对照研究。
Pain Physician. 2020 Sep;23(5):477-484.
3
Microdiscectomy compared with transforaminal epidural steroid injection for persistent radicular pain caused by prolapsed intervertebral disc: the NERVES RCT.微创手术与经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗椎间盘突出症所致持续性神经根痛的比较:NERVES RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Apr;25(24):1-86. doi: 10.3310/hta25240.
4
The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.年轻、活跃人群腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的结果:按突出类型和节段的相关性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):33-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a42.
5
The impact of being overweight or obese on 12 month clinical recovery in patients following lumbar microdiscectomy for radiculopathy.超重或肥胖对腰椎间盘切除术治疗神经根病后 12 个月临床康复的影响。
Spine J. 2024 Apr;24(4):625-633. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.10.023. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
6
Variability in recovery following microdiscectomy and postoperative physiotherapy for lumbar radiculopathy: A latent class trajectory analysis.腰椎神经根病患者行显微椎间盘切除术和术后物理治疗后的恢复情况存在差异:潜在类别轨迹分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 Jan;224:107551. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107551. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
7
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
8
A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial of SI-6603 (condoliase) in patients with radicular leg pain associated with lumbar disc herniation.一项关于 SI-6603(康多丽酶)治疗与腰椎间盘突出症相关的神经根性腿痛的 3 期、随机、双盲、假对照试验。
Spine J. 2024 Dec;24(12):2285-2296. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
9
Lumbar arthroplasty for treatment of primary or recurrent lumbar disc herniation.腰椎间盘置换术治疗原发性或复发性腰椎间盘突出症。
Int Orthop. 2023 Apr;47(4):1071-1077. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05708-x. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
10
Ozone chemonucleolysis in non-contained lumbar disc herniations: a pilot study with 12 months follow-up.非包容性腰椎间盘突出症的臭氧化学髓核溶解术:一项为期12个月随访的初步研究。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;92:93-7. doi: 10.1007/3-211-27458-8_20.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of CT-guided oxygen-ozone (O-O) therapy for low back pain: a retrospective single-center study.CT引导下氧-臭氧(O-O)疗法治疗腰痛的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性单中心研究
Radiol Med. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s11547-025-02071-2.
2
Pain Relief, Disability, and Hospital Costs After Intradiscal Ozone Treatment or Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A 24-Month Real-World Prospective Study.腰椎间盘突出症经皮椎间盘内臭氧治疗或显微椎间盘切除术的疼痛缓解、功能障碍及住院费用:一项为期24个月的真实世界前瞻性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 26;14(13):4534. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134534.
3
Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy in South Korea.
韩国腰椎间盘突出症伴神经根病患者的循证临床实践指南
Neurospine. 2025 Jun;22(2):366-383. doi: 10.14245/ns.2550094.047. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
4
Comparison of different treatments for lumbar disc herniation: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.腰椎间盘突出症不同治疗方法的比较:网状Meta分析与系统评价
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02992-9.
5
Comparison of surgical outcomes between unilateral biportal endoscopic technique and open microdiscectomy in patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation: a single-center retrospective study in China.单节段腰椎间盘突出症患者单侧双孔椎间孔镜技术与开放显微椎间盘切除术的手术效果比较:中国一项单中心回顾性研究
Asian Spine J. 2025 Aug;19(4):600-608. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0002. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
6
How Effective is Ozone Therapy in Treatment of Lumbar Disc Disease: a Systematic Review of Prospective Studies.臭氧疗法治疗腰椎间盘疾病的效果如何:前瞻性研究的系统评价
Maedica (Bucur). 2024 Dec;19(4):816-822. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2024.19.4.8162024;.
7
Ozone: complicated effects in central nervous system diseases.臭氧:中枢神经系统疾病中的复杂作用。
Med Gas Res. 2025 Mar 1;15(1):44-57. doi: 10.4103/mgr.MEDGASRES-D-24-00005. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
8
Effects of Ozone Disc Nucleolysis in Management of Herniated Lumbar Intervertebral Disc: A Retrospective Single-Center Study of 149 Patients.臭氧椎间盘溶解术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效:一项对149例患者的回顾性单中心研究
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Jul 17;30:e944645. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944645.
9
Effects of different seat inclination angles on lumbar dynamic response and injury during lunar-earth reentry.不同座椅倾斜角度对月地重返过程中腰椎动态响应及损伤的影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jun 11;12:1395114. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1395114. eCollection 2024.
10
Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Practical Overview of Current Possibilities.影像引导下退行性腰椎疾病的微创治疗选择:当前可能性的实用概述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 30;14(11):1147. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111147.