• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在大流行期间区分 COVID-19 和登革热与其他发热性疾病:COVIDENGUE 评分的制定和内部验证。

Differentiating COVID-19 and dengue from other febrile illnesses in co-epidemics: Development and internal validation of COVIDENGUE scores.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Investigation - Clinical Epidemiology (CIC 1410), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion, Saint Pierre, Reunion.

Centre for Clinical Investigation - Clinical Epidemiology (CIC 1410), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion, Saint Pierre, Reunion.

出版信息

Travel Med Infect Dis. 2022 Jan-Feb;45:102232. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102232. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102232
PMID:34896649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8656151/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this cohort study was to develop two scores able to differentiate coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) from dengue and other febrile illnesses (OFIs).

METHODS

All subjects suspected of COVID-19 who attended the SARS-CoV-2 testing center of Saint-Pierre hospital, Reunion, between March 23 and May 10, 2020, were assessed for identifying predictors of both infectious diseases from a multinomial logistic regression model. Two scores were developed after weighting the odd ratios then validated by bootstrapping.

RESULTS

Over 49 days, 80 COVID-19, 60 non-severe dengue and 872 OFIs were diagnosed. The translation of the best fit model yielded two scores composed of 11 criteria: contact with a COVID-19 positive case (+3 points for COVID-19; 0 point for dengue), return from travel abroad within 15 days (+3/-1), previous individual episode of dengue (+1/+3), active smoking (-3/0), body ache (0/+5), cough (0/-2), upper respiratory tract infection symptoms (-1/-1), anosmia (+7/-1), headache (0/+5), retro-orbital pain (-1/+5), and delayed presentation (>3 days) to hospital (+1/0). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.79 (95%CI 0.76-0.82) for COVID-19 score and 0.88 (95%CI 0.85-0.90) for dengue score. Calibration was satisfactory for COVID-19 score and excellent for dengue score. For predicting COVID-19, sensitivity was 97% at the 0-point cut-off and specificity 99% at the 10-point cut-off. For predicting dengue, sensitivity was 97% at the 3-point cut-off and specificity 98% at the 11-point cut-off.

CONCLUSIONS

COVIDENGUE scores proved discriminant to differentiate COVID-19 and dengue from OFIs in the context of SARS-CoV-2 testing center during a co-epidemic.

摘要

目的

本队列研究旨在开发两种评分系统,以区分 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)与登革热和其他发热性疾病(OFIs)。

方法

2020 年 3 月 23 日至 5 月 10 日期间,所有疑似 COVID-19 而到留尼汪圣皮埃尔医院 SARS-CoV-2 检测中心就诊的患者,均采用多项逻辑回归模型来评估这两种传染病的预测指标。对优势比进行加权后,建立了两种评分系统,并通过自举法进行验证。

结果

在 49 天内,共诊断出 80 例 COVID-19、60 例非重症登革热和 872 例 OFIs。最佳拟合模型的翻译产生了两种评分系统,共包含 11 个标准:与 COVID-19 阳性病例接触(COVID-19 为+3 分,登革热为 0 分)、15 天内从国外返回(+3/-1)、曾有个人登革热发作(+1/+3)、吸烟(-3/0)、全身疼痛(0/+5)、咳嗽(0/-2)、上呼吸道感染症状(-1/-1)、嗅觉丧失(+7/-1)、头痛(0/+5)、眼眶后疼痛(-1/+5)、以及延迟就诊(>3 天)(+1/0)。COVID-19 评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.79(95%CI 0.76-0.82),登革热评分的曲线下面积为 0.88(95%CI 0.85-0.90)。COVID-19 评分的校准情况良好,登革热评分的校准情况极佳。预测 COVID-19 时,截断值为 0 分时,灵敏度为 97%,特异性为 99%;截断值为 10 分时,灵敏度为 97%,特异性为 98%。预测登革热时,截断值为 3 分时,灵敏度为 97%,特异性为 98%。

结论

在 SARS-CoV-2 检测中心同时流行 COVID-19 和登革热的情况下,COVIDENGUE 评分可用于区分 COVID-19 和登革热与 OFIs。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbaf/8656151/e0cc1a91aa1b/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbaf/8656151/6f75a62d044e/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbaf/8656151/9c1484df805e/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbaf/8656151/e0cc1a91aa1b/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbaf/8656151/6f75a62d044e/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbaf/8656151/9c1484df805e/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbaf/8656151/e0cc1a91aa1b/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Differentiating COVID-19 and dengue from other febrile illnesses in co-epidemics: Development and internal validation of COVIDENGUE scores.在大流行期间区分 COVID-19 和登革热与其他发热性疾病:COVIDENGUE 评分的制定和内部验证。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2022 Jan-Feb;45:102232. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102232. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
2
Distinguishing non severe cases of dengue from COVID-19 in the context of co-epidemics: A cohort study in a SARS-CoV-2 testing center on Reunion island.在新冠疫情大流行背景下鉴别登革热非重症病例与 COVID-19:留尼汪岛 SARS-CoV-2 检测中心的一项队列研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Apr 26;15(4):e0008879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008879. eCollection 2021 Apr.
3
Distinguishing SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Non-SARS-CoV-2 Viral Infections in Adult Patients through Clinical Score Tools.通过临床评分工具区分成年患者的新型冠状病毒2型感染和非新型冠状病毒2型病毒感染
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 12;8(1):61. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8010061.
4
Modelling of a triage scoring tool for SARS-COV-2 PCR testing in health-care workers: data from the first German COVID-19 Testing Unit in Munich.医护人员 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 检测分诊评分工具的建模:来自慕尼黑德国首个 COVID-19 检测单位的数据。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07627-5.
5
Interacting Epidemics in Amazonian Brazil: Prior Dengue Infection Associated With Increased Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Risk in a Population-Based Cohort Study.亚马逊河流域巴西的交互传染病:基于人群的队列研究显示,既往登革热感染与 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)风险增加相关。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):2045-2054. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab410.
6
Clinical prediction rule for SARS-CoV-2 infection from 116 U.S. emergency departments 2-22-2021.2021 年 2 月 22 日,美国 116 家急诊部门的 SARS-CoV-2 感染临床预测规则。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0248438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248438. eCollection 2021.
7
COVID-19 Antibodies as Predictor of Severe Dengue among Hospitalized Children with Dengue Illness in the Post-third-wave Period of COVID-19 Infection in India.COVID-19 抗体可预测印度 COVID-19 感染第三波后登革热住院患儿重症登革热
J Assoc Physicians India. 2022 Sep;70(9):11-12. doi: 10.5005/japi-11001-0092.
8
Impact of concurrent epidemics of dengue, chikungunya, zika, and COVID-19.登革热、基孔肯雅热、寨卡和 COVID-19 同时流行的影响。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021 Feb 26;54:e08372020. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0837-2020. eCollection 2021.
9
Characteristics of Patients Co-infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and Dengue Virus, Buenos Aires, Argentina, March-June 2020.2020 年 3 月至 6 月期间,阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯,同时感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型和登革病毒患者的特征。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;27(2):348-351. doi: 10.3201/eid2702.203439.
10
Diagnosis of Dengue in a returning traveler from Pakistan suspected of COVID-19, California, USA.从美国加利福尼亚州疑似 COVID-19 的巴基斯坦归国旅行者中诊断登革热。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;101(4):115517. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115517. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Dengue Mimickers: Which Clinical Conditions Can Resemble Dengue Fever?登革热的模仿者:哪些临床病症可能类似登革热?
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2024 Dec 16;57:e002062024. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0334-2024. eCollection 2024.
2
Epidemiological, virological and clinical characterization of a Dengue/Zika outbreak in the Caribbean region of Costa Rica 2017-2018.2017-2018 年哥斯达黎加加勒比地区登革热/寨卡疫情的流行病学、病毒学和临床特征。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Jun 26;14:1421744. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1421744. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognosis of patients with acute respiratory failure due to the SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 variant: a multicenter retrospective matched cohort study.SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 变异株导致急性呼吸衰竭患者的预后:一项多中心回顾性匹配队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 24;12(1):8747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12767-4.
2
Exhaustive assessment of Reunion Island inpatients with COVID-19 during the first wave.对留尼汪岛第一波新冠疫情期间的住院患者进行详尽评估。
Infect Dis Now. 2022 Mar;52(2):112-116. doi: 10.1016/j.idnow.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
3
Differentiating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from influenza and dengue.
鉴别 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)与流感和登革热。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 5;11(1):19713. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99027-z.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Test Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 17,171 Suspected COVID-19 Patients.快速抗原检测试剂盒检测新型冠状病毒的诊断准确性:对17171例疑似新冠肺炎患者的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 8;10(16):3493. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163493.
5
Clinical and Virological Features of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Variants of Concern: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), and B.1.617.2 (Delta).关注的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)变异株的临床和病毒学特征:比较 B.1.1.7(阿尔法)、B.1.351(贝塔)和 B.1.617.2(德尔塔)的回顾性队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):e1128-e1136. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab721.
6
Analysis of Ear, Nose and Throat Manifestations in COVID-19 Patients.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者耳鼻咽喉表现分析
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jul;25(3):e343-e348. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730456. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Differentiating Dengue from COVID-19: Comparison of Cases in Colombia.从 COVID-19 中鉴别登革热:哥伦比亚病例比较。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jul 9;105(3):745-750. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0912.
8
COVID-19 Antibody Detecting Rapid Diagnostic Tests Show High Cross-Reactivity When Challenged with Pre-Pandemic Malaria, Schistosomiasis and Dengue Samples.新冠病毒抗体检测快速诊断测试在使用大流行前的疟疾、血吸虫病和登革热样本进行检测时显示出高交叉反应性。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 25;11(7):1163. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071163.
9
Characteristics of patients coinfected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and dengue virus, Lambayeque, Peru, May-August 2020: A retrospective analysis.2020 年 5 月至 8 月秘鲁兰巴耶克省同时感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型和登革病毒患者的特征:一项回顾性分析。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2021 Sep-Oct;43:102132. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102132. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
10
Interacting Epidemics in Amazonian Brazil: Prior Dengue Infection Associated With Increased Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Risk in a Population-Based Cohort Study.亚马逊河流域巴西的交互传染病:基于人群的队列研究显示,既往登革热感染与 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)风险增加相关。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):2045-2054. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab410.