Suppr超能文献

可提取有机氟分析:一种筛查人体中全氟和多氟烷基物质污染升高的方法?

Extractable organofluorine analysis: A way to screen for elevated per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance contamination in humans?

机构信息

Man-Technology-Environment (MTM) Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Örebro University, Örebro, SE 701 82, Sweden.

School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SE 405 30, Sweden.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2022 Jan 15;159:107035. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107035. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

Abstract

The ubiquitous occurrence of a few per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in humans and the environment has been previously reported. However, the number of PFAS humans and the environment are potentially exposed to is much higher, making it difficult to investigate every sample in detail. More importantly, recent studies have shown an increasing fraction of potentially unknown PFAS in human samples. A screening tool for identifying samples of concern that may contain high PFAS levels, to be studied more thoroughly, is needed. This study presents a simplified workflow to detect elevated PFAS levels using extractable organofluorine (EOF) analysis. A fluorine mass balance analysis on samples with high EOF, targeting 63 PFAS, can then confirm the PFAS contamination. Whole blood samples from a cohort of individuals with historical drinking water contamination from firefighting foams (n = 20) in Ronneby (Sweden) and a control group (n = 9) with background exposure were used as a case study. The average EOF concentration in the Ronneby group was 234 ng/mLF (<107-592 ng/mLF) vs 24.8 ng/mLF (17.6-37.8 ng/mL F) in the control group. The large difference (statistically significant, p < 0.05) in the EOF levels between the exposed and control groups would have made it possible to identify samples with high PFAS exposure only using EOF data. This was confirmed by target analysis, which found an average ∑PFAS concentration of 346 ng/mL in the exposed group and 7.9 ng/mL in the control group. The limit of quantification for EOF analysis (up to 107 ng/mLF using 0.5 mL whole blood) did not allow for the detection of PFAS levels in low or sub parts per billion (ng/mL) concentrations, but the results indicate that EOF analysis is a suitable screening method sensitive enough to detect elevated/significant/exposure above background levels by known or unknown PFAS.

摘要

先前已有报道称,在人类和环境中普遍存在少数几种全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)。然而,人类和环境可能接触到的 PFAS 数量要高得多,这使得详细研究每一个样本变得困难。更重要的是,最近的研究表明,在人类样本中,越来越多的潜在未知 PFAS 被发现。因此,需要一种筛选工具来识别可能含有高浓度 PFAS 的样本,以便更深入地研究。本研究提出了一种简化的工作流程,使用可提取有机氟(EOF)分析来检测高水平的 PFAS。然后,对 EOF 含量高的样本进行氟质量平衡分析,针对 63 种 PFAS 进行分析,可以确认 PFAS 污染情况。本研究使用了来自瑞典隆比(Ronneby)一个有历史消防泡沫饮用水污染的个体队列(n=20)和一个背景暴露的对照组(n=9)的全血样本作为案例研究。罗尼比组的平均 EOF 浓度为 234ng/mLF(107-592ng/mLF),而对照组为 24.8ng/mLF(17.6-37.8ng/mL F)。暴露组和对照组之间 EOF 水平的巨大差异(具有统计学意义,p<0.05),仅使用 EOF 数据就可以识别出具有高 PFAS 暴露的样本。这一点通过目标分析得到了证实,暴露组的平均∑PFAS 浓度为 346ng/mL,对照组为 7.9ng/mL。EOF 分析的定量下限(使用 0.5mL 全血时高达 107ng/mLF)无法检测到低浓度或亚十亿分之几(ng/mL)的 PFAS 水平,但结果表明 EOF 分析是一种合适的筛选方法,足够灵敏,可以检测到已知或未知 PFAS 引起的高于背景水平的升高/显著/暴露。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验