Suppr超能文献

引入的红树林可以躲避来自海洋和陆地敌人的破坏。

Introduced mangroves escape damage from marine and terrestrial enemies.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Sacramento, California, USA.

School of Life Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawai'i, USA.

出版信息

Ecology. 2022 Mar;103(3):e3604. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3604. Epub 2022 Jan 30.

Abstract

The enemy release hypothesis (ERH) posits that introduced species often leave their enemies behind when introduced to a new range. This release from enemies may allow introduced species to achieve higher growth and reproduction and may explain why some invaders flourish in new locations. Red mangroves (Rhizophora mangle) were introduced to Hawai'i from Florida over a century ago. Because Hawai'i has no native mangroves, the arrival of R. mangle fundamentally changed the structure and function of estuarine shorelines. While numerous enemies affect red mangroves in their native range (tropical America), in Hawai'i, mangroves apparently experience little herbivory, which may explain why introduced mangroves are so productive, fecund, and continue to spread. In this study, we compared the effects of enemies in native and introduced populations of brackish red mangroves (R. mangle) in 8-10 sites in the native range (Florida, Belize, and Panama) and introduced range of mangroves (Hawai'i). At each site, we measured the (1) occurrence of enemies using timed visual surveys, (2) occurrence of damage to different mangrove structures (leaves, apical buds, dead twigs, roots, propagules, and seedlings), and (3) rate of propagule herbivory using tethering experiments. Consistent with the ERH, we found an order of magnitude less damage and fewer enemies in introduced than native mangrove sites. While introduced mangroves harbored few enemies and minimal damage, native mangroves were affected by numerous enemies, including leaf-eating crabs, specialist bud moths, wood-boring insects and isopods, and propagule predators. These patterns were consistent across all plant structures (roots to leaves), among marine and terrestrial enemies, and across functional groups (browsers, borers, pathogens, etc.), which demonstrates enemy escape occurs consistently among different functional groups and via trophic (e.g., herbivores) and non-trophic (e.g., root borers) interactions. Our study is among the first biogeographical enemy release studies to take a comprehensive approach to quantifying the occurrence of damage from a broad suite of marine and terrestrial taxa across an array of wetland plant structures. Understanding how natural enemies alter this key foundation species will become increasingly relevant globally as mangroves continue to invade new regions through intentional plantings or range expansion driven by climate change.

摘要

“敌害释放假说”(ERH)认为,当引入物种进入新的分布范围时,它们通常会将其敌害留在原地。这种与敌害的脱离可能使引入物种的生长和繁殖速度更快,并可能解释为什么一些入侵物种在新的地点能够茁壮成长。红树(Rhizophora mangle)一个多世纪前从佛罗里达州引入夏威夷。由于夏威夷没有本地的红树林,因此红树的到来从根本上改变了河口岸线的结构和功能。尽管红树在其原生范围(热带美洲)中有许多敌害,但在夏威夷,红树林显然很少受到草食性动物的侵害,这也许可以解释为什么引入的红树林如此高产、多产且仍在不断扩散。在这项研究中,我们在原生分布范围(佛罗里达州、伯利兹和巴拿马)和红树林引入分布范围(夏威夷)的 8-10 个地点,比较了原生和引入的咸水红树(R. mangle)种群的敌害效应。在每个地点,我们通过定时视觉调查(1)测量敌害的发生情况,(2)测量不同红树林结构(叶片、顶芽、死枝、根、繁殖体和幼苗)受损情况,(3)使用系绳实验测量繁殖体草食性。与 ERH 一致,我们发现引入的红树林地点的损害和敌害数量都要少一个数量级。虽然引入的红树林几乎没有敌害,损害也很少,但原生红树林受到许多敌害的影响,包括食叶蟹、专食顶芽的蛾类、蛀木昆虫和等足类动物以及繁殖体捕食者。这些模式在所有植物结构(从根到叶)、海洋和陆地敌害以及功能群(食草动物、蛀木动物、病原体等)中都是一致的,这表明敌害逃避现象在不同的功能群中以及通过营养(如食草动物)和非营养(如根蛀虫)相互作用中都一致地发生。我们的研究是首批采用综合方法量化广泛的海洋和陆地分类群对一系列湿地植物结构造成的损害的生物地理学敌害释放研究之一。随着红树林因人为种植或气候变化导致的范围扩大而继续入侵新的地区,了解自然敌害如何改变这种关键的基础物种将在全球范围内变得越来越重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验