• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving cancer care locally: Study of a hospital affiliate network model.提高当地癌症护理水平:医院附属网络模式研究。
J Rural Health. 2022 Sep;38(4):827-837. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12639. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
2
Identifying Core Functions of an Evidence-Based Intervention to Improve Cancer Care Quality in Rural Hospitals.识别基于证据的干预措施在改善农村医院癌症护理质量方面的核心功能。
Front Health Serv. 2022;2. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.891574. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
3
Improving the Quality of Cancer Care in Community Hospitals.提高社区医院癌症护理质量。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):632-638. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08867-y. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
4
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
5
Cancer Survivorship Care in the United States at Facilities Accredited by the Commission on Cancer.美国癌症委员会认证的医疗机构中的癌症生存护理。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2418736. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18736.
6
Evaluation of Access to Hospitals Most Ready to Achieve National Accreditation for Rectal Cancer Treatment.评估最有资格获得直肠癌治疗国家认证的医院的准入情况。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jun 1;154(6):516-523. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5521.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
The Impact of Commission on Cancer Accreditation Status, Hospital Rurality and Hospital Size on Quality Measure Performance Rates.癌症委员会认证状态、医院所在地的农村性和医院规模对质量衡量指标绩效率的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;29(4):2527-2536. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11304-3. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Relationship between cancer center accreditation and performance on publicly reported quality measures.癌症中心认证与公开报告质量指标绩效之间的关系。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jun;259(6):1091-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000542.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient preferences for location of cancer surgery in a community cancer affiliate network.社区癌症附属网络中患者对癌症手术地点的偏好
Surgery. 2025 Apr;180:109002. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.109002. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
2
Leveraging public health cancer surveillance capacity to develop and support a rural cancer network.利用公共卫生癌症监测能力来发展和支持农村癌症网络。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Aug 21;8(4):e10448. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10448. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Geographic distance to Commission on Cancer-accredited and nonaccredited hospitals in the United States.美国距离癌症委员会认证和未认证医院的地理距离。
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12862. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12862. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
4
Rural comprehensive cancer care: Qualitative analysis of current challenges and opportunities.农村综合癌症护理:当前挑战和机遇的定性分析。
J Rural Health. 2024 Sep;40(4):634-644. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12842. Epub 2024 May 16.
5
Identifying Core Functions of an Evidence-Based Intervention to Improve Cancer Care Quality in Rural Hospitals.识别基于证据的干预措施在改善农村医院癌症护理质量方面的核心功能。
Front Health Serv. 2022;2. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.891574. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the Quality of Cancer Care in Community Hospitals.提高社区医院癌症护理质量。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):632-638. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08867-y. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
2
Closing the Rural Cancer Care Gap: Three Institutional Approaches.缩小农村地区癌症治疗差距:三种机构方法。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Jul;16(7):422-430. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00174. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
3
Survival After Cancer Treatment at Top-Ranked US Cancer Hospitals vs Affiliates of Top-Ranked Cancer Hospitals.癌症治疗后在顶尖美国癌症医院与顶尖癌症医院附属医院的生存情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e203942. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3942.
4
Commentary and Complementary Data to Add to "Compliance with Cancer Quality Measures Over Time and Their Association with Survival Outcomes: The Commission on Cancer's Experience with the Quality Measure Requiring at Least 12 Regional Lymph Nodes to be Removed and Analyzed with Colon Cancer Resections".对《随时间推移对癌症质量指标的依从性及其与生存结果的关联:癌症委员会在结肠癌切除术中要求至少切除并分析12个区域淋巴结的质量指标方面的经验》的评论及补充数据
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;27(4):1306-1307. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08150-9. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
5
Evaluating Travel Distance to Radiation Facilities Among Rural and Urban Breast Cancer Patients in the Medicare Population.评估医疗保险人群中农村和城市乳腺癌患者到放射治疗设施的旅行距离。
J Rural Health. 2020 Jun;36(3):334-346. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12413. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
6
Hospital and Surgeon Selection for Medicare Beneficiaries With Stage II/III Rectal Cancer: The Role of Rurality, Distance to Care, and Colonoscopy Provider.医疗保险受益人的 II/III 期直肠癌的医院和外科医生选择:农村、与医疗的距离和结肠镜提供者的作用。
Ann Surg. 2021 Oct 1;274(4):e336-e344. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003673.
7
Differential Safety Between Top-Ranked Cancer Hospitals and Their Affiliates for Complex Cancer Surgery.顶级癌症医院与其附属医院在复杂癌症手术中的安全性差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191912. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1912.
8
Compliance with Cancer Quality Measures Over Time and Their Association with Survival Outcomes: The Commission on Cancer's Experience with the Quality Measure Requiring at Least 12 Regional Lymph Nodes to be Removed and Analyzed with Colon Cancer Resections.随着时间的推移,对癌症质量指标的遵守情况及其与生存结果的关联:肿瘤委员会在结肠癌切除术中至少切除和分析 12 个区域淋巴结的质量指标方面的经验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1613-1621. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07323-w. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
9
Impact of Breast Center Accreditation on Compliance with Breast Quality Performance Measures at Commission on Cancer-Accredited Centers.乳腺中心认证对肿瘤委员会认证中心乳腺质量绩效指标合规性的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 May;26(5):1202-1211. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-07108-7. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
10
Geographic Distribution and Survival Outcomes for Rural Patients With Cancer Treated in Clinical Trials.农村癌症患者临床试验治疗的地理分布和生存结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1235.

提高当地癌症护理水平:医院附属网络模式研究。

Improving cancer care locally: Study of a hospital affiliate network model.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

J Rural Health. 2022 Sep;38(4):827-837. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12639. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1111/jrh.12639
PMID:34897807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9189248/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Affiliate Network (MCCAN) increased access to high-quality cancer care for patients treated in community hospitals across the state by leveraging the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) standards to improve quality among its member sites. This study describes the network activities and services identified as most helpful or effective to its members, as well as the perceived value of joining MCCAN or pursing accreditation.

METHODS

An independent research team conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with 18 administrators and clinicians from 10 MCCAN hospitals in 2019. Interviews were transcribed and a thematic analysis was conducted.

FINDINGS

Network affiliation and CoC accreditation were perceived as helpful to improving quality of care. Having both clinician and administrative champions were key facilitators to achieving CoC standards and made mentoring of member sites a critical activity of the Network. Other components identified as valuable and/or key to the Network's success included providing access to specific CoC-required clinical services (eg, genetic counseling); offering regular performance monitoring and individualized feedback; establishing a culture of quality improvement; and fostering trust within the Network with patient referrals (ie, sending patients back to their local hospital for ongoing care).

CONCLUSIONS

Quality improvement in community cancer programs is challenging but several strategies were identified by members as valuable and effective. Efforts to disseminate the MCCAN model should focus on identifying the needs of community hospitals, implementing a quality monitoring system, and fostering site-level champions who can be influential drivers of change.

摘要

目的

肯塔基大学马克癌症中心附属网络 (MCCAN) 通过利用美国外科医师学院癌症委员会 (CoC) 标准来提高其成员站点的质量,为全州社区医院治疗的患者增加获得高质量癌症护理的机会。本研究描述了网络活动和服务,这些活动和服务被认为对其成员最有帮助或最有效,以及加入 MCCAN 或追求认证的感知价值。

方法

一个独立的研究小组在 2019 年对来自 MCCAN 10 家医院的 18 名管理人员和临床医生进行了深入的半结构化访谈。对访谈进行了转录,并进行了主题分析。

结果

网络成员资格和 CoC 认证被认为有助于提高护理质量。拥有临床医生和管理人员的拥护者是实现 CoC 标准的关键促进因素,并使成员站点的指导成为网络的关键活动。被认为有价值和/或对网络成功至关重要的其他组成部分包括提供特定 CoC 要求的临床服务(例如,遗传咨询);提供定期的绩效监测和个性化反馈;建立质量改进文化;并通过患者转介在网络内建立信任(即,将患者送回当地医院进行持续护理)。

结论

社区癌症项目的质量改进具有挑战性,但成员们确定了一些有价值且有效的策略。传播 MCCAN 模式的努力应侧重于确定社区医院的需求,实施质量监测系统,并培养能够成为变革推动者的基层拥护者。