Institute of Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Institute of Endodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Jun;34(4):641-649. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12851. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
This study aims to evaluate and compare the film thickness obtained with a resin cement and two composite resins, preheated and/or ultrasonically vibrated, as luting agents.
One hundred and twenty-six (126) pairs of resin discs were randomly assigned to six experimental groups (n = 21) according to luting agent (Variolink Esthetic LC, IPS Empress Direct or Estelite Omega) and cementation technique (preheating at 68°C and/or ultrasonic vibration). Specimens were luted by applying a controlled force. Following sectioning and film thickness measurement through field emission gun scanning electron microscopy, statistical analysis was carried out considering a 5% significance level.
Statistically significant lower film thickness was observed in Variolink Esthetic LC group when compared to all composite resin groups (p < 0.001), except IPS Empress Direct preheated and ultrasonically vibrated group (p = 0.073). IPS Empress Direct with ultrasonic vibration yielded statistically lower film thickness values than Estelite Omega groups, regardless of luting technique (p < 0.05). Ultrasonically vibrated Estelite Omega groups showed statistically lower film thickness values than solely preheated groups (p < 0.05).
Both Variolink Esthetic LC and IPS Empress Direct preheated and ultrasonically vibrated provided the lowest film thickness. The addition of ultrasonic vibration during cementation proved to be effective in reducing film thickness of both tested composite resins.
The cementation technique will have variable results depending on the luting material. Adhesive cementation protocols with composite resins should mainly consider ultrasonic vibration, but also preheating, as strategies for reducing film thickness. The tested resin cement, alongside with IPS Empress Direct composite resin preheated and ultrasonically vibrated, provided the lowest film thickness among the tested materials and techniques.
本研究旨在评估和比较经预热和/或超声振动的树脂水门汀和两种复合树脂作为黏结剂获得的膜厚度。
根据黏结剂(Variolink Esthetic LC、IPS Empress Direct 或 Estelite Omega)和黏结技术(68°C 预热和/或超声振动),将 126 对树脂片随机分为 6 个实验组(n=21)。通过施加控制的力进行试件黏结。在进行切片和通过场发射枪扫描电子显微镜测量膜厚度后,在 5%的显著水平下进行了统计分析。
与所有复合树脂组相比,Variolink Esthetic LC 组的膜厚度明显较低(p<0.001),但与 IPS Empress Direct 经预热和超声振动组除外(p=0.073)。无论黏结技术如何,IPS Empress Direct 经超声振动的膜厚度值均明显低于 Estelite Omega 组(p<0.05)。经超声振动的 Estelite Omega 组的膜厚度值明显低于单独预热组(p<0.05)。
Variolink Esthetic LC 和 IPS Empress Direct 经预热和超声振动均可提供最低的膜厚度。在黏结过程中添加超声振动被证明可有效降低两种测试复合树脂的膜厚度。
黏结技术的结果将取决于黏结材料。对于复合树脂的黏接技术,应主要考虑超声振动,还应考虑预热,作为降低膜厚度的策略。所测试的树脂水门汀以及经预热和超声振动的 IPS Empress Direct 复合树脂在测试材料和技术中提供了最低的膜厚度。