Beyene Mussie T, Leibowitz Scott G, Pennino Michael J
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Post-Doctoral Fellow c/o U.S. EPA, CPHEA-PESD, Corvallis, Oregon 97333, United States.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, Corvallis, Oregon 97333, United States.
Water Resour Res. 2021 Aug 31;57(10):1-20.
Determining wildland fire impacts on streamflow can be problematic as the hydrology in burned watersheds is influenced by post-fire weather conditions. This study presents a quantile-based analytical framework for assessing fire impacts on low and peak daily flow magnitudes, while accounting for post-fire weather influences. This framework entails (a) the bootstrap method to compute the relative change in the post-fire annual flow and weather statistics, (b) Double Mass analysis to detect if post-fire baseflow and quick flow yield ratios are significantly altered, and (c) a quantile regression method to parse fire effects on flow at a specific quantile. We illustrate the applicability of this analytical framework using 44 western US streams with at least 5% of their watershed area burned. Results indicate that large, high-severity burns in upland watersheds can raise the streamflow magnitude at the 0.05 and 0.95 quantiles for at least the five post-fire years. Quantile regression results show that the median fire-related increase in flow for the five post-fire years can be up to 5000% (Standard Error; < 2%) at the 0.05 quantile and 161% ( < 10%) at the 0.95 quantile. The fire-related increase in flow was often pronounced at the 0.05 quantile for streams in the Pacific Northwest and California regions. The difference in fire effects on flow (at both quantiles) across streams was related to post-fire weather, pyrology, physiography, and land cover. The proposed analytical framework can be useful for detecting and quantifying fire effects on the low and peak stream flows in burned watersheds without overlapping disturbances.
确定野火对河川径流的影响可能存在问题,因为火烧流域的水文状况受火灾后天气条件的影响。本研究提出了一个基于分位数的分析框架,用于评估火灾对日流量低值和峰值的影响,同时考虑火灾后天气的影响。该框架包括:(a) 采用自助法计算火灾后年流量和天气统计数据的相对变化;(b) 进行双累积分析,以检测火灾后基流和快速流产流比是否发生显著变化;(c) 采用分位数回归方法解析特定分位数下火灾对流量的影响。我们使用美国西部44条流域面积至少5%被烧毁的溪流,说明了该分析框架的适用性。结果表明,高地流域大面积、高强度的火灾至少在火灾后的五年内,可使0.05和0.95分位数的河川径流量增加。分位数回归结果显示,火灾后五年流量中值与火灾相关的增加量在0.05分位数处可达5000%(标准误差;<2%),在0.95分位数处可达161%(<10%)。太平洋西北地区和加利福尼亚地区溪流的流量在0.05分位数处与火灾相关的增加通常较为显著。不同溪流间火灾对流量的影响差异(在两个分位数处)与火灾后天气、火理学、地貌学和土地覆盖有关。所提出的分析框架可用于检测和量化火灾对火烧流域低流量和峰值流量的影响,且不受干扰重叠的影响。